Considerations for the telehealth systems of tomorrow: An analysis of student perceptions of telehealth technologies

JMIR Medical Education

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Bull, Tyler Preston ^a   Dewar, Alexis Roxanne ^a   Malvey, Donna M ^a   Szalma, James Leo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Telehealth advantages; Telehealth disadvantages; Telehealth systems; Thematic analysis; Younger adults

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032165437     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23693762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/mededu.5392     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American Telemedicine Association. Research Outcomes: Telemedicine's Impact on Healthcare Cost and Quality. 2015 Apr. URL:http://www.americantelemed.org/docs/default-source/policy/ examples-of-research-outcomes-telemedicine's-impact-on-healthcare-cost-and-quality.pdf [accessed 2016-07-06] [WebCite Cache ID 6io9SAsKA]
2. Benavides-Vaello S, Strode A, Sheeran BC. Using technology in the delivery of mental health and substance abuse treatment in rural communities: a review. J Behav Health Serv Res 2013 Jan;40(1):111-120. [doi: 10.1007/s11414-012-9299-6] [Medline: 23093443]
3. Dellifraine JL, Dansky KH. Home-based telehealth: a review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14(2):62-66. [doi: 10.1258/jtt.2007.070709] [Medline: 18348749]
4. Fischer SH, David D, Crotty BH, Dierks M, Safran C. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders. Int J Med Inform 2014 Sep;83(9):624-635 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.005] [Medline: 24996581]
5. Force S, Brady C. Case study: Lee Memorial Health System the role of telehealth in an integrated health delivery system. Caring 2013 Oct;32(8):28-31. [Medline: 24428042]
6. Malvey D, Slovensky D. mHealth: Transforming Healthcare. New York, NY: Springer; 2014.
7. Baker LC, Johnson SJ, Macaulay D, Birnbaum H. Integrated telehealth and care management program for Medicare beneficiaries with chronic disease linked to savings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011 Sep;30(9):1689-1697 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0216] [Medline: 21900660]
8. Cryer L, Shannon SB, Van AM, Leff B. Costs for 'hospital at home' patients were 19 percent lower, with equal or better outcomes compared to similar inpatients. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012 Jun;31(6):1237-1243 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1132] [Medline: 22665835]
9. Jackson KM, Scott KE, Graff ZJ, Bateman DA, Flynn JT, Keenan JD, et al. Cost-utility analysis of telemedicine and ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy of prematurity management. Arch Ophthalmol 2008 Apr;126(4):493-499. [doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.4.493] [Medline: 18413518]
10. Rojas SV, Gagnon M. A systematic review of the key indicators for assessing telehomecare cost-effectiveness. Telemed J E Health 2008 Nov;14(9):896-904 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0009] [Medline: 19035798]
11. Wootton R. Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management-an evidence synthesis. J Telemed Telecare 2012 Jun;18(4):211-220 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1258/jtt.2012.120219] [Medline: 22674020]
12. Kvedar J, Coye MJ, Everett W. Connected health: a review of technologies and strategies to improve patient care with telemedicine and telehealth. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014 Feb;33(2):194-199. [doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0992] [Medline: 24493760]
13. Huang J, Lin S. Exploring the key factors in the choice of home telehealth by using the health belief model. Telemed J E Health 2009 Jan;15(1):87-92. [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0069] [Medline: 19199852]
14. Davis F, Venkatesh V. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. Int J Hum-Comput St 1996 Jul;45(1):19-45. [doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040]
15. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 2000 Feb;46(2):186-204. [doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926]
16. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Inform Syst Res 2000 Dec;11(4):342-365. [doi: 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872]
17. Venkatesh V, Thong J. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly 2012;36:E.
18. Kuo K, Liu C, Ma C. An investigation of the effect of nurses' technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13:88 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-88] [Medline: 23938040]
19. Liu C, Cheng T. Exploring critical factors influencing physicians' acceptance of mobile electronic medical records based on the dual-factor model: a validation in Taiwan. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015;15:4 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0125-3] [Medline: 25889506]
20. Gilbert M, Hottes TS, Kerr T, Taylor D, Fairley CK, Lester R, et al. Factors associated with intention to use internet-based testing for sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(11):e254 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2888] [Medline: 24240644]
21. Wu K, Zhao Y, Zhu Q, Tan X, Zheng H. A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. Int J Inform Manage 2011 Dec;31(6):572-581. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004]
22. Glinkowski W, Pawłowska K, Kozłowska L. Telehealth and telenursing perception and knowledge among university students of nursing in Poland. Telemed J E Health 2013 Jul;19(7):523-529 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0217] [Medline: 23650941]
23. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006 Jan;3(2):77-101. [doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
24. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:117 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117] [Medline: 24047204]
25. Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C. Qualitative Reserach Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2013.
26. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012;22(3):276-282 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 23092060]
27. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37-46.
28. Bull T. Anticipated Telehealth Device Usage in Younger Adults. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida; 2015.