Knowledge for Free? Distributed Innovation as a Source of Learning

Public Policy and Administration

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 56-68

  Bowden, Alistair ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032069377     PISSN: 09520767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/095207670502000306     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andriani, P (2001), ‘Diversity, knowledge and complexity theory: some introductory issues’, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol 5, No 2, pp. 257-274.
2. Bennington, J. (2000), ‘ The modernization and improvement of government and public services’, Public Money & Management, April-June, pp.3-8.
3. Bryman, A. (2001), Social Research Methods, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
4. Collis, J. and Hussey, R. (2003), Business Research: a Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students, (2nd ed.) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
5. Dolfsma, W. (2004), ‘The process of new service development - issues of formalization and appropriability’, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol 8, No 3, pp. 1-19.
6. Ethiraj, S.K. and Levinthal, D. (2002), ‘Modularity and innovation in complex systems’, Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings 2002.
7. Franke, N. and von Hippel, E. (2003), ‘Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software’, Research Policy, Vol 32, pp. 1199-1215.
8. Guardian. (2004), ‘Blair sets out seven policy challenges for election run-up’. [http://society.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5006374-108586,00.html] [Accessed 15 October 2004].
9. Hartley, J., Butler, M.J.R. and Bennington, J. (2002), ‘Local government modernization: UKL and comparative analysis from an organizational perspective’, Public Management Review, Vol 4, No 3, pp. 387-404.
10. Jeppesen, L.B. and Molin, M.J. (2003), ‘Customers as co-developers: learning and innovation outside the firm’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol 15, No 3, pp. 363-383.
11. Kuwabara, K. (2000), ‘Linux: a bazaar at the edge of chaos’, First Monday, Vol 5, No 3. [ http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_3/kuwabara/index] [Accessed 17 August 2003].
12. Leadbeater, C. (2003), ‘Open innovation in public services’, in T. Bentley and J. Wilsdon (eds), The Adaptive State: Strategies for Personalising The Public Realm, (London: DEMOS).
13. Leadbeater, C. (2004), Personalisation Through Participation: A New Script for Public Services, (London: DEMOS).
14. Lee, G.K. and Cole, R.E. (2003), ‘From a finn-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: the case of the Linux kernel development’, Organization Science, Vol 14, No 6, pp. 633-649.
15. Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2002), ‘Some simple economics of open source’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol 50, No 2, pp. 197-234.
16. Lloyd, M. (2002),For richer, for poorer? An exploration of community engagement in policy making and regeneration partnerships. Unpublished MBA dissertation, University of Durham.
17. Local Government Association (2004), Independence, Opportunity, Trust: A Manifesto for Local Communities, (London: Local Government Association).
18. Mulgan, G., Steinberg, T. and Salem, O. (2005), Wide Open: Open Source Methods and their Future Potential, (London: DEMOS).
19. National Consumer Council (2004 a), Future Services: Are You Being Served?, (London: NCC).
20. National Consumer Council (2004 b), Making Public Services Personal: A New Compact for Public Services, (London: NCC).
21. New Local Government Network (2004), Making Choices: How Can Choice Improve Local Public Services?, (London: NLGN).
22. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company, (New York: Oxford University Press).
23. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005 a), Citizen Engagement and Public Services: Why Neighbourhoods Matter, (London: ODPM).
24. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005 b), New Localism - Citizen Engagement Neighbourhoods and Public Services: Evidence from Local Government, (London: ODPM).
25. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005 c), Securing Better Outcomes: Developing a New Performance Framework, (London: ODPM).
26. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005 d), Vibrant Local Leadership, (London: ODPM).
27. Pierre, J. and Stoker, G. (2000), ‘Towards Multi-Level Governance’, in P. Dunleavy, A. Gamble, I. Holliday and G. Peele (eds), Developments in British Politics, (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
28. Raymond, E.S. (2001), The Cathedral & The Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, (Revised Ed.) (Sebastopol, California: O'Reilly).
29. Rothwell, R. (1994), ‘Towards the fifth-generation innovation process’, International Marketing Review, Vol 11, No 1, pp. 7-31.
30. Rushkoff, D. (2003), Open Source Democracy: How Online Communication is Changing Offline Politics, (London: DEMOS).
31. Sawnhey, M. and Prandelli, E. (2000), ‘Communities of creation: managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets’, California Management Review, Vol 42, No 4, pp. 24-54.
32. Thomke, S. (2003), Experimentation Matters, (Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press).
33. Thomke, S. and von Hippel, E. (2002), ‘Customers as innovators: a new way to create value’, Harvard Business Review, Vol 80, No 4, pp. 74-81.
34. von Hippel, E. (1994), ‘Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation’, Management Science, Vol 40, No 4, pp. 429-439.
35. von Hippel, E. and Katz, R. (2002), ‘Shifting innovation to users via toolkits’,Management Science, Vol 48, No 7, pp. 821-833.
36. von Hippel, E., Thomke, S. and Sonnack, M. (1999), ‘Creating breakthroughs at 3M’, Harvard Business Review, Vol 77, No 8, pp. 47-57.
37. Weber, S. (2004), The Success of Open Source, (Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press).
38. YouGov. (2004), YouGov/Daily Telegraph Survey Results, 21-23 September. [ http://www.yougov.com/yougov_website/asp-besPolArchives/pdf/TEL0401010201I.pdf] [Accessed 7 October 2004].