OCO-2 advances photosynthesis observation from space via solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence

Science

Volumn 358, Issue 6360, 2017, Pages

  Sun, Y ^a,l   Frankenberg, C ^a,b   Wood, J D ^c   Schimel, D S ^a   Jung, M ^d   Guanter, L ^e   Drewry, D T ^a,f   Verma, M ^g   Porcar Castell, A ^h   Griffis, T J ⁱ   Gu, L ^j   Magney, T S ^a   Kohler P ^b   Evans, B ^k   Yuen, K ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOGEOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^e GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^f Los Angeles   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^j OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^l Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CHLOROPHYLL;

BIOME; CHLOROPHYLL; DATA ACQUISITION; EMPIRICAL ORTHOGONAL FUNCTION ANALYSIS; FLUORESCENCE; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; OCO; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PRIMARY PRODUCTION; SATELLITE DATA; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BIOSPHERE; CARBON CYCLE; CARBON SOURCE; CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; CLIMATE CHANGE; HARVEST; LAND BIOME; LAND USE; NONHUMAN; PHOTON; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMOTE SENSING; SOLAR ENERGY; SPACE; VEGETATION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FLUORESCENCE; SUNLIGHT;

CARBON CYCLE; CHLOROPHYLL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EXTRATERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT; FLUORESCENCE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SUNLIGHT;

EID: 85031320280     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aam5747     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. R. J. Norby et al., Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 18052–18056 (2005). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509478102; pmid: 16330779
2. P. Friedlingstein et al., Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Clim. 19, 3337–3353 (2006). doi: 10.1175/JCLI3800.1
3. C. Huntingford et al., Simulated resilience of tropical rainforests to CO2-induced climate change. Nat. Geosci. 6, 268–273 (2013). doi: 10.1038/ngeo1741
4. C. Rosenzweig et al., Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 3268–3273 (2014). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222463110; pmid: 24344314
5. D. Schimel et al., Observing terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle from space. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1762–1776 (2015). doi: 10.1111/gcb.12822; pmid: 25472464
6. G. C. Papageorgiou, Govindjee, in Non-Photochemical Quenching and Energy Dissipation in Plants, Algae and Cyanobacteria, B. Demmig-Adams, G. Garab, W. Adams III, Govindjee, Eds. (Springer, 2014), pp. 1–44.
7. N. R. Baker, Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 89–113 (2008). doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759; pmid: 18444897
8. A. Porcar-Castell et al., Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: Mechanisms and challenges. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4065–4095 (2014). doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru191; pmid: 24868038
9. B. Genty, J.-M. Briantais, N. R. Baker, The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj. 990, 87–92 (1989). doi: 10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9
10. G. H. Krause, E. Weis, Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 313–349 (1991). doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.001525
11. C. Frankenberg et al., New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L17706 (2011). doi: 10.1029/2011GL048738
12. J. Joiner et al., First observations of global and seasonal terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from space. Biogeosciences 8, 637–651 (2011). doi: 10.5194/bg-8-637-2011
13. L. Guanter et al., Retrieval and global assessment of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT space measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 121, 236–251 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.006
14. J. Joiner et al., Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements: Methodology, simulations, and application to GOME-2. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 6, 2803–2823 (2013). doi: 10.5194/amt-6-2803-2013
15. P. Köhler, L. Guanter, J. Joiner, A linear method for the retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY data. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 2589–2608 (2015). doi: 10.5194/amt-8-2589-2015
16. J.-E. Lee et al., Forest productivity and water stress in Amazonia: Observations from GOSAT chlorophyll fluorescence. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20130171 (2013). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0171; pmid: 23760636
17. N. C. Parazoo et al., Interpreting seasonal changes in the carbon balance of southern Amazonia using measurements of XCO2 and chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2829–2833 (2013). doi: 10.1002/grl.50452
18. Y. Sun et al., Drought onset mechanisms revealed by satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Insights from two contrasting extreme events. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 2427–2440 (2015). doi: 10.1002/2015JG003150
19. Y. Yoshida et al., The 2010 Russian drought impact on satellite measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Insights from modeling and comparisons with parameters derived from satellite reflectances. Remote Sens. Environ. 166, 163–177 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.06.008
20. K. Guan et al., Improving the monitoring of crop productivity using spaceborne solar-induced fluorescence. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 716–726 (2016). doi: 10.1111/gcb.13136; pmid: 26490834
21. J. Joiner et al., The seasonal cycle of satellite chlorophyll fluorescence observations and its relationship to vegetation phenology and ecosystem atmosphere carbon exchange. Remote Sens. Environ. 152, 375–391 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.022
22. S. Walther et al., Satellite chlorophyll fluorescence measurements reveal large-scale decoupling of photosynthesis and greenness dynamics in boreal evergreen forests. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2979–2996 (2016). doi: 10.1111/gcb.13200; pmid: 26683113
23. L. Guanter et al., Global and time-resolved monitoring of crop photosynthesis with chlorophyll fluorescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, E1327–E1333 (2014). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320008111; pmid: 24706867
24. C. Frankenberg et al., Prospects for chlorophyll fluorescence remote sensing from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2. Remote Sens. Environ. 147, 1–12 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.007
25. M. Rossini et al., Analysis of red and far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and their ratio in different canopies based on observed and modeled data. Remote Sens. 8, 412 (2016). doi: 10.3390/rs8050412
26. L. Guanter et al., Potential of the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) onboard the Sentinel-5 Precursor for the monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 1337–1352 (2015). doi: 10.5194/amt-8-1337-2015
27. M. Drusch et al., The FLuorescence EXplorer Mission Concept - ESA’s Earth Explorer 8. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55, 1273–1284 (2017). doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2621820
28. U. Rascher et al., Sun-induced fluorescence – a new probe of photosynthesis: First maps from the imaging spectrometer HyPlant. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 4673–4684 (2015). doi: 10.1111/gcb.13017; pmid: 26146813
29. S. Wieneke et al., Airborne based spectroscopy of red and far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Implications for improved estimates of gross primary productivity. Remote Sens. Environ. 184, 654–667 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.025
30. J. D. Wood et al., Multiscale analyses of solar-induced florescence and gross primary production. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 533–541 (2017). doi: 10.1002/2016GL070775
31. M. Verma et al., Effect of environmental conditions on the relationship between solar-induced fluorescence and gross primary productivity at an OzFlux grassland site. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 122, 716–733 (2017). doi: 10.1002/2016JG003580
32. D. Baldocchi et al., FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 2415–2434 (2001). doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082〈2415:FANTTS〉2.3.CO;2
33. J. Verrelst et al., Evaluating the predictive power of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to estimate net photosynthesis of vegetation canopies: A SCOPE modeling study. Remote Sens. Environ. 176, 139–151 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.01.018
34. G. Tramontana, M. Jung, G. Camps-valls, K. Ichii, B. Raduly, Predicting carbon dioxide and energy fluxes across global FLUXNET sites with regression algorithms. Biogeosciences 13, 4291–4313 (2016). doi: 10.5194/bg-13-4291-2016
35. S. W. Running et al., A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54, 547–560 (2004). doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0547:ACSMOG]2.0.CO;2
36. M. Zhao, S. W. Running, Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009. Science 329, 940–943 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1192666; pmid: 20724633
37. A. Anav et al., Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: A review. Rev. Geophys. 53, 785–818 (2015). doi: 10.1002/2015RG000483
38. J. L. Monteith, Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. Source J. Appl. Ecol. 9, 747–766 (1972). doi: 10.2307/2401901
39. G. D. Farquhar, S. von Caemmerer, J. A. Berry, A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980). doi: 10.1007/BF00386231; pmid: 24306196
40. T. S. Magney et al., Connecting active to passive fluorescence with photosynthesis: A method for evaluating remote sensing measurements of Chl fluorescence. New Phytol. 215, 1594–1608 (2017). doi: 10.1111/nph.14662; pmid: 28664542
41. A. Huete et al., Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 195–213 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2
42. T. Keenan et al., Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperate forest phenology. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 598–604 (2014). doi: 10.1038/nclimate2253
43. N. C. Parazoo et al., Terrestrial gross primary production inferred from satellite fluorescence and vegetation models. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 3103–3121 (2014). doi: 10.1111/gcb.12652; pmid: 24909755
44. I. N. Polonsky, D. M. O’Brien, J. B. Kumer, C. W. O’Dell; the geoCARB Team, Performance of a geostationary mission, geoCARB, to measure CO2, CH4 and CO column-averaged concentrations. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 7, 959–981 (2014). doi: 10.5194/amt-7-959-2014
45. C. G. Homer et al., Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 81, 345–354 (2015).