Oversight of Genomic Data Sharing: What Roles for Ethics and Data Access Committees?

Biopreservation and Biobanking

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 469-474

  Shabani, Mahsa ^a   Dove, Edward S ^b   Murtagh, Madeleine ^c   Knoppers, Bartha Maria ^d   Borry, Pascal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

data access committees; data sharing; ethics committees; governance; oversight

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SECURITY; GENETIC DATABASE; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; ETHICS; GENOMICS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

EID: 85031292982     PISSN: 19475535     EISSN: 19475543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/bio.2017.0045     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Rothstein MA. Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research? Am J Bioeth 2010;10:3-11
2. National Institute of Health. Genomic Data Sharing Policy. 2014. Available at: https://gds.nih.gov/PDF/NIH-GDS- Policy.pdf (accessed August 28, 2016)
3. Kaye J, Heeney C, Hawkins N, et al. Data sharing in genomics-Re-shaping scientific practice. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:331-335
4. Expert Advisory Group on Data Access. Governance of Data Access. 2015. Available at: https://wellcome.ac.uk/ sites/default/files/governance-of-data-access-eagda-jun15.pdf (accessed August 28, 2016)
5. Shabani M, Borry P. ''You want the right amount of oversight'': Interviews with data access committee members and experts on genomic data access. Genet Med 2016;18: 892-897
6. Ramos EM, Din-Lovinescu C, Bookman EB, et al. A mechanism for controlled access to GWAS data: Experience of the GAIN Data Access Committee. Am J Hum Genet 2013;92:479-488
7. Parker M, Bull SJ, de Vries J, et al. Ethical data release in genome-wide association studies in developing countries. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000143
8. Murtagh MJ, Turner A, Minion JT, et al. International data sharing in practice: New technologies meet old governance. Biopreserv Biobank 2016;14:231-240
9. Shabani M, Knoppers BM, Borry P. From the principles of genomic data sharing to the practices of data access committees. EMBO Mol Med 2015;7:507-509
10. Knoppers BM. Framework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related data. Hugo J 2014;8:3
11. Vries J, Williams TN, Bojang K, et al. Knowing who to trust: Exploring the role of 'ethical metadata' in mediating risk of harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa. BMC Med Ethics 2014;15:62
12. Fullerton SM, Lee SS. Secondary uses and the governance of de-identified data: Lessons from the human genome diversity panel. BMC Med Ethics 2011;12:16
13. El Emam K, Alvarez C. A critical appraisal of the Article 29 Working Party Opinion 05/2014 on data anonymization techniques. International Data Privacy Law 2014. doi: 10.1093/idpl/ipu033
14. Shabani M, Bezuidenhout L, Borry P. Attitudes of research participants and the general public towards genomic data sharing: A systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2014;14:1053-1065
15. Ossorio PN. Bodies of data: Genomic data and bioscience data sharing. Soc Res (New York) 2011;78:907-932
16. National Institutes of Health. Points to Consider for Institutions and Institutional Review Boards in Submission and Secondary Use of Human Genomic Data under the National Institutes of Health Genomic Data Sharing Policy. 2016. Available at: https://gds.nih.gov/pdf/GDS-Points-to- Consider-for-Institutions-and-IRBs.pdf (accessed August 28, 2016)
17. Robinson JO, Slashinski MJ, Chiao E, et al. It depends whose data are being shared: Considerations for genomic data sharing policies. J Law Biosci 2015. doi: 10.1093/jlb/ lsv030
18. Dyke SO, Philippakis AA, De Argila JR, et al. Consent codes: Upholding standard data use conditions. PLoS Genet 2016;12:e1005772
19. Wilbanks J, Friend SH. First, design for data sharing. Nat Biotechnol 2016;34:377-379
20. Kaye J, Briceno Moraia L, Mitchell C, et al. Access governance for Biobanks: The case of the BioSHaRE-EU cohorts. Biopreserv Biobank 2016;14:201-206
21. Simpson CL, Goldenberg AJ, Culverhouse R, et al. Practical barriers and ethical challenges in genetic data sharing. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11:8383-8398
22. Reseau de medecine genetique appliquee (RMGA). Statement of Principles. 2016. Available at: www.rmga.qc.ca/ en/issues.html (accessed August 28, 2016)
23. Lemke AA, Smith ME, Wolf WA, et al. Broad data sharing in genetic research: Views of institutional review board professionals. IRB 2011;33:1-5
24. Lowrance WW. Privacy, Confidentiality, and Health Research. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2012: 60-61
25. Dove ES, Townend D, Meslin EM, et al. Ethics review for international data-intensive research. Science 2016;351: 1399-1400
26. Klitzman R. The myth of community differences as the cause of variations among IRBs. AJOB Prim Res 2011;2: 24-33