An Integrated Framework for supporting decision making during early design stages on end-of-life disassembly

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 168, Issue , 2017, Pages 558-574

  Harivardhini, S ^a   Murali Krishna, K ^a   Chakrabarti, Amaresh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Disassembly effort; Disassembly time; End of life phase; Environmental impact; Product design; Product disassembly

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PRODUCT DESIGN; RECOVERY;

COMPUTER BASED TOOLS; DESIGN SPECIFICATION; DISASSEMBLY EFFORT; DISASSEMBLY TIME; END OF LIVES; END-OF-LIFE DISASSEMBLY; INTEGRATED FRAMEWORKS; PRODUCT DISASSEMBLY;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 85030696482     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.102     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Alting, L., Legarth, J.B., Life cycle engineering and design. Ann. CIRP 44:2 (1995), 569–580.
2. Andrae, A.S., Xia, M., Zhang, J., Tang, X., Practical EcoDesign and EcoInnovation of consumer electronics—the case of mobile phones. Challenges, 7(1), 2016, 3.
3. Andrae, A.S., Vaija, M.S., To which degree does sector specific standardization make life cycle assessments comparable?—the case of global warming potential of smartphones. Challenges 5:2 (2014), 409–429.
4. Banda, K., Zeid, I., To disassemble or not: a computational methodology for decision making. J. Intell. Manuf. 17 (2006), 621–634.
5. Bhander, G.S., Hauschild, M., McAloone, T., Implementing life cycle assessment in product development. Environ. Prog. 22:4 (2003), 255–267.
6. Bogue, R., Design for disassembly: a critical twenty-first century discipline. Assem. Autom. 27:4 (2007), 285–289, 10.1108/01445150710827069.
7. Brennan, L., Gupta, S.M., Taleb, K.N., Operations planning issues in an assembly/disassembly environment. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 14:9 (1994), 57–67.
8. Chiu, M.C., Kremer, G.E.O., Investigation of the applicability of Design for X tools during design concept evolution: a literature review. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 13:2 (2011), 132–167.
9. Corcoran, P.M., Andrae, A.S.G., Vaija, S.M., Garcia, C., Elisabeth Dechenaux, E., Effect of Modeling Approach on Climate Change Focused Life Cycle Assessments for a Contemporary Smartphone Device. 2014 Available online: http://aran.library.nuigalway.ie/xmlui/handle/10379/4522.
10. Crowther, P., Designing for disassembly to extend service life. 8th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, 1999.
11. Das, S.K., Yedlarajiah, P., Narendra, R., An approach for estimating the end-of-life product disassembly effort and cost. Int. J. Prod. Res. 38:3 (2000), 657–673.
12. Das, S., Naik, S., Process planning for product disassembly. Int. J. Prod. Res. 40:6 (2002), 1335–1355.
13. Delorme, A., Statistical Methods. Encyclopedia of Medical Device and Instrumentation, vol. 6, 2006, 240–264.
14. Desai, A., Mital, A., Evaluation of disassemblability to enable design for disassembly in mass production. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 32:4 (2003), 265–281.
15. Ecoinvent, www.ecoinvent.org, (online).
16. Feldmann, K., Trautner, S., Meedt, O., Innovative disassembly strategies based on flexible partial destructive tools. Annu. Rev. Control 23:1999 (1999), 159–164.
17. Ferrer, G., On the widget remanufacturing operation. Eur. J. Opera. Res. 135 (2001), 373–393.
18. Gaha, R., Yannou, B., Benamara, A., A new ecodesign approach on CAD systems. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 15:7 (2014), 1443–1451.
19. Geiger, D., Zussmann, E., Probablistic reactive disassembly planning. CIRP Ann. 45:1 (1996), 49–52.
20. Gkeleri, V.P., Tourassis, V.D., A Concise Framework for Disassemblability Metrics. 2008, IEEE, 2008.
21. Goedkoop, M., Spriensma, R., The Eco-indicator 99: a Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Eco-indicator 99 methodology report, 2000, PRé Consultants b.v., Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
22. Harivardhini, S., Chakrabarti, A., Comparison of disassembly effort and ergonomic hazards in disassembling electronic appliances by formal and informal recycling sectors in developing countries. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. (IJPLM) 8:No. 2 (2015), 111–131.
23. Harivardhini, S., Chakrabarti, A., A new model for estimating end of life disassembly effort during early stages of product design. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy (CTEP), 2016, 10.1007/s10098-016-1142-y.
24. Harivardhini, S., Chakrabarti, A., E-waste disassembling: profitable at a cost of occupational hazard?. Presented in SusTech - IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability, 2015, Weber State University, Utah, U.S.
25. Harjula, T., Rapoza, B., Knight, W.A., Boothroyd, G., Design for disassembly and the environment. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 45:1 (1996), 109–114.
26. Heijungs, R., Ecodesign—carbon footprint—life cycle assessment—life cycle sustainability analysis. A flexible framework for a continuum of tools. Sci. J. Riga Tech. Univ. Environ. Clim. Technol. 4:1 (2010), 42–46.
27. Hula, A., Jalali, K., Hamza, K., Skerlos, S.J., Saitou, K., Multi-criteria decision-making for optimization of product disassembly under multiple situations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:23 (2003), 5303–5313.
28. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. 1981, Springer-Verlag.
29. Ijomah, W.L., McMahon, C.A., Hammond, G.P., Newman, S.T., Development of robust design-for-remanufacturing guidelines to further the aims of sustainable development. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45:18–19 (2007), 4513–4536.
30. Ilgin, M.A., Gupta, S.M., Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art. J. Environ. Manag. 91:3 (2010), 563–591.
31. Ishii, K., Life-Cycle engineering design. ASME J. Mech. Des. 117 (1995), 42–47.
32. Jovane, F., Alting, L., Eversheim, W., Feldmann, K., Seliger, G., Roth, N., A key issue in product life cycle: disassembly. Ann. ClRP, 42/2/1993, 1993.
33. Key, J., Chi Square One – Way Classification. A R–eport by Research Design in Occupational Education., 2016, Oklahoma State University.
34. Kloepffer, W., Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13:2 (2008), 89–95.
35. Kroll, E., Carver, B., Disassembly analysis through time estimation and other metrics. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 15 (1999), 191–200.
36. Kroll, E., Hanft, T.A., Quantitative evaluation of product disassembly for recycling. Res. Eng. Des. 10:1 (1998), 1–14.
37. Kuo, T.C., Disassembly sequence and cost analysis for electromechanical products. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 16:1 (2000), 43–54.
38. Kuo, T.C., Enhancing disassembly and recycling planning using life-cycle analysis. Robot. Comput.-Integrated Manuf. 22:5–6 (2006), 420–428.
39. Lacasa, E., Santolaya, J.L., Fuentes, L., Majarena, A.C., Implementing sustainability criteria in product development. Procedia Eng. 132 (2015), 1029–1036.
40. Lee, S.G., Lye, S.W., Khoo, M.K., A multi-objective methodology for evaluating product end-of-life options and disassembly. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 18 (2001), 148–156.
41. Majumder, M., Multi Criteria Decision Making. Impact of Urbanization on Water Shortage in Face of Climatic Aberrations. 2015, 35–48, 10.1007/978-981-4560-73-3.
42. Motevallian, B., Abhary, K., Luong, L., Marian, R.M., Integration and optimisation of product design for ease of disassembly. Eng. Future, 2010, 317–340.
43. Peeters, J.R., Vanegas, P., Dewulf, W., Duflou, J.R., Economic and environmental evaluation of design for active disassembly. J. Clean. Prod. 140 (2017), 1182–1193.
44. Ron, A.D., Penev, K., Disassembly and recycling of electronic consumer products: an overview. Technovation 15:6 (1995), 363–374.
45. Rose, C.M., Ishii, K., Product endoflife strategy categorization design tool. J. Electron. Manuf., 9, 1999, 4151.
46. Smith, S., Hsu, L.Y., Smith, G.C., Partial disassembly sequence planning based on costbenefit analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 139 (2016), 729–739.
47. Sodhi, R., Sonnenberg, M., Das, S.K., Evaluating the unfastening effort in design for disassembly and serviceability. J. Eng. Des. 15:1 (2004), 69–90.
48. Srinivasan, H., Shyamsundar, N., Gadh, R., A framework for virtual disassembly analysis. J. Intell. Manuf. 8 (1997), 277–295.
49. Subramani, A., Dewhurst, P., Repair time estimation for early stages of product development. J. Des. Manuf. 4:2 (1994), 129–137.
50. Sundin, E., Lindahl, M., Ijomah, W., Product design for product/service systems design experiences from Swedish industry. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., 20(5), 2009, 723753.
51. Sundin, E., Elo, K., Lee, H.M., Design for automatic end of life processes. Assem. Autom. 32:4 (2012), 389–398.
52. Technical Committee ISO/TC 207, E. management, & Subcommittee SC 5, L. cycle assessment, Environmental Management -Life Cycle Assessment -Principles and Framework. 1997, International Standard ISO, 14040.
53. Tim Murphy, Exploded View Drawing of Horizontal Lifting Clamp, Murphy Industrial Products. 2016.
54. Veerakamolmal, P., Gupta, S.M., A combinatorial cost-benefit analysis methodology for designing modular electronic products for the environment. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.99CH36357), 1999, 268–273.
55. Villalba, G., Segarra, M., Chimenos, J.M., Espiell, F., Using the recyclability index of materials as a tool for design for disassembly. Ecol. Econ. 50:3–4 (2004), 195–200.
56. Viswanathan, S., Allada, V., Configuration analysis to support product redesign for end-of-life disassembly. Int. J. Prod. Res. 39:8 (2001), 1733–1753.
57. Wang, X., Chan, H.K., Li, D., A case study of an integrated fuzzy methodology for green product development. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 241:1 (2015), 212–223.
58. Washington State's Department of Labor and Industries, Washington State's WISHA Caution Zone and Washington. 2010.
59. Wimmer, W., Züst, R., Lee, K.M., Ecodesign Implementation: a Systematic Guidance on Integrating Environmental Considerations into Product Development, vol. 6, 2004, Springer Science & Business Media.
60. Xu, L., Yang, J., Introduction to Multi-criteria Decision Making and the Evidential Reasoning Approach. 2001 1 86115 111 X, 1–21.
61. Zussmann, E., Kriwet, A., Seliger, G., Disassembly oriented assessment methodology to support design for recycling. CIRP Ann., 43(1), 1994.