Performance management—motivating and developing good teachers? The experiences of teachers in a small special school

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 71-81

  Isherwood, Mary ^a   Johnson, Heather ^b   Brundrett, Mark ^c  

^a Camberwell Park School   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030616290     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03004270601103384     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barker, B., 2005. Transforming schools: illusion or reality?. School Leadership and Management, 25 (2): 99-116.
2. Bryman, A., 2004. Social research methods:, 2nd edition, London: Oxford University Press.
3. Burton, N., and Brundrett, M., 2005. Leading the curriculum in the primary school, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
4. Cambridge Education Associates. 2005. External advisor—process guidance notes: Light Touch Validation of performance management Available online at: www.cea.co.uk (accessed 1 January 2006)
5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K., 2000. Research methods in education:, 5th edition, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
6. Crane, M., 2005. Winning hearts and minds: leadership and performance management Available online at: www.ncsl.org.uk/literaturereviews (accessed 1 January 2006)
7. Cutler, T., and Waine, B., 1999. Rewarding better teachers? Performance related pay in schools. Educational Management and Administration, 27 (1): 55-70.
8. Dadds, M., 2004. Perspectives on practitioner research, Cranfield: National College for School Leadership.
9. Department for Education and Skills. 1998. Teachers: meeting the challenge of change, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
10. Department for Education and Skills. 2000. Performance management in schools: performance management framework, London: DfES publications.
11. Department for Education and Skills. 2001. Helping you develop: guidance on producing a professional development record, London: DfES publications.
12. Department for Education and Skills. 2003. Performance management 2003: support guide for governors and headteachers Available online at: www.teachernet.gov.uk (accessed 1 January 2006)
13. Department for Education and Skills. 2004. Excellence and enjoyment: learning and teaching in the primary years Available online at: www.standards.dfes.gov.uk (accessed 1 January 2006)
14. Farrell, C., and Morris, J., 2004. Resigned compliance: teacher attitudes towards performance related pay in schools. Education Management, Leadership and Administration, 32 (1): 81-104.
15. Flick, U., Von Kardoff, E., and Ines, S., eds. 2004. A companion to qualitative research, London: Sage.
16. Fullan, M., 2001. The new meaning of educational change, (3rd edn), London: RoutledgeFalmer.
17. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., and McKee, A., 2002. The new leaders, London: Little Brown.
18. Gorard, S., 2005. Current contexts for research in educational leadership and management. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 33 (2): 155-164.
19. Investors in People (2004) [Anonymous] School: assessment review feedback report. Centre for Assessment and Recognition (NW)
20. Jennings, K., and Lomas, L., 2003. Implementing performance management for head teachers in English secondary schools: a case study. Educational Management and Administration, 31 (4): 369-383.
21. Morrison, M., 2002. “ What do we mean by educational research? ”. In Research methods in educational leadership and management, Edited by: Coleman, M., and Briggs, R. J., London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
22. Munn, P., and Drever, E., 1990. Using questionnaires in small-scale research, Glasgow, The SCRE Centre: University of Glasgow.
23. School Teachers' Review Body. 2004. The agreement on rewards and incentives for post-threshold teachers and members of the school leadership group Available online at: www.teachernet.gov.uk (accessed 1 January 2006)
24. Wallace, M., 2003. Managing the unmanageable? Coping with complex educational change. Educational Management and Administration, 31 (1): 9-29.