How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research?

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 80, Issue , 2017, Pages 73-81

  Hopp, Christian ^a   Hoover, Gary A ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Peer review system; Plagiarism; Publication ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030453249     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AoM, Academy of management code of ethics. Academy of Management Journal 54:6 (2011), 1299–1306.
2. Arce, D.G., Enders, W., Hoover, G.A., Plagiarism and its impact on the economics profession. Bulletin of Economic Research 60:3 (2008), 231–243.
3. Azoulay, P., Furman, J.L., Krieger, J.L., Murray, F., Retractions. The Review of Economics and Statistics 97:5 (2015), 1118–1136.
4. Bedeian, A.G., Taylor, S.G., Miller, A.N., Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning & Education 9:4 (2010), 715–725.
5. Enders, W., Hoover, G., Plagiarism in the economics profession: A survey. Challenge 49:5 (2006), 92–107.
6. Enders, W., Hoover, G.A., Whose line is it?: Plagiarism in economics. Journal of Economic Literature 42:3 (2004), 487–493.
7. Haug, C.J., Peer-review fraud — Hacking the scientific publication process. New England Journal of Medicine 373:25 (2015), 2393–2395.
8. Honig, B., Lampel, J., Siegel, D., Drnevich, P., Ethics in the production and dissemination of management research: Institutional failure or individual fallibility?. Journal of Management Studies 51:1 (2014), 118–142.
9. Hoover, G.A., A game-theoretic model of plagiarism. Atlantic Economic Journal 34 (2006), 449–454.
10. Jann, B., Multinomial goodness-of-fit: Large-sample tests with survey design correction and exact tests for small samples. Stata Journal, 8(2), 2008, 147.
11. Martin, B., Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment. Research Policy 42 (2013), 1005–1014.
12. Martin, B.R., Clark, Wright, (eds.) 4. Ethics and integrity in publishing. How to get published in the best Management Journals, Vol. 29, 2016, Edward Elgar Publishing.
13. Park, I.U., Peacey, M.W., Munafò, M.R., Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review. Nature 506:7486 (2014), 93–96.
14. Retractionwatch, www.retractionwatch.com/2014/12/19/elsevier-retracting-16-papers-faked-peer-review/, 2014 (Nov. 25, 2016).
15. Retractionwatch, www.retractionwatch.com/2014/03/20/want-to-make-sure-your-paper-gets-published-just-do-your-own-peer-review-like-this-researcher-did/, 2014 (Nov. 25, 2016).
16. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M., Retraction statement for ‘ethics and integrity of the publishing process: Myths, facts, and a roadmap’ by Marshall Schminke and Maureen L. Ambrose. Management and Organization Review 10:1 (2014), 157–162.
17. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M.L., Retracted: Ethics and integrity in the publishing process: Myths, facts, and a roadmap. Management and Organization Review 7:3 (2011), 397–406.
18. Sinclair, K.D., Corr, S.A., Gutierrez, C.G., Fisher, P.A., Lee, J.H., Rathbone, A.J., Gardner, D.S., Healthy ageing of cloned sheep. Nature Communications, 2016, 7.
19. Steen, R.G., Retractions in the scientific literature: Is the incidence of research fraud increasing?. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2010 (jme-2010).
20. Stitzel, B., G. Hoover, W. Clark, More on plagiarism in the social sciences, Social Science Quarterly (Forthcoming).
21. Thombs, B.D., Levis, A.W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A.F., Levenson, J.L., Lumley, M.A., Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 78:1 (2015), 1–6.
22. Wilhite, A.W., Fong, E.A., Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science 335:6068 (2012), 542–543.
23. Woodside, A.G., Journal and author impact metrics: An editorial. 2009.