Surgery for constipation: systematic review and practice recommendations: Results II: Hitching procedures for the rectum (rectal suspension)

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 19, Issue , 2017, Pages 37-48

  Grossi, U ^a   Knowles, C H ^a   Mason, J ^b   Lacy Colson, J ^c   Brown, S R ^d   Campbell, Kenneth ^g   Chapman, Mark ^g   Clarke, Andrew ^g   Cruickshank, Neil ^g   Dixon, Anthony ^g   Emmett, Christopher ^g   Hooper, Richard ^g   Horrocks, Emma ^g   Lindsey, Ian ^g   Mercer Jones, Mark ^g   Miller, Andrew ^g   Pares, David ^g   Pilkington, Sophie ^g   Smart, Neil ^g   Stevens, Natasha ^g   Telford, Karen ^g   Vollebregt, Paul ^g   Williams, Andrew ^g   Yiannakou, Yan ^g   more..

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL SHREWSBURY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e National Institute for Health Research: Chronic Constipation Treatment Pathway ^*  (United Kingdom)

^f Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland   (United Kingdom)

^g NONE

Author keywords

chronic constipation; laparoscopic resection rectopexy (LRR); laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR); open rectopexy (OR); Rectopexy; robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR)

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC CONSTIPATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC VENTRAL MESH RECTOPEXY; LENGTH OF STAY; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOPEXY; RECTAL SUSPENSION; RECTUM PROLAPSE; RECTUM ULCER; RECURRENT DISEASE; REVIEW; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; TREATMENT INDICATION; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPLICATION; CONSTIPATION; INTUSSUSCEPTION; LAPAROSCOPY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RECTUM; RECTUM DISEASE; SURGICAL MESH; SUTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSTIPATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTUSSUSCEPTION; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; OPERATIVE TIME; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RECTAL DISEASES; RECTUM; RECURRENCE; SURGICAL MESH; SUTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85030266529     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.13773     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. D'Hoore A, Penninckx F. Obstructed defecation. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 280–7.
2. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989; 30: 1737–49.
3. Tou S, Brown SR, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015; 11: CD001758.
4. Vantets WF, Kuijpers JHC. Internal rectal intussusception - fact or fancy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 1080–3.
5. Graf W et al. Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception. Eur J Surg 1996; 162: 905–11.
6. Tsiaoussis J et al. Rectoanal intussusception: presentation of the disorder and late results of resection rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 838–44.
7. von Papen M et al. Functional results of laparoscopic resection rectopexy for symptomatic rectal intussusception. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 50–5.
8. Johnson E et al. Long-term outcome after resection rectopexy for internal rectal intussusception. ISRN Gastroenterol 2012; 2012: 824671.
9. Biviano I et al. Comparative outcome of stapled trans-anal rectal resection and macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 4199–205.
10. Hirst GR et al. The role of rectocele repair in targeted patients with obstructed defaecation. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 159–63.
11. Sabbagh R et al. Long-term anatomical and functional results of laparoscopic promontofixation for pelvic organ prolapse. BJU Int 2010; 106: 861–6.
12. Sitzler PJ et al. Long-term clinical outcome of surgery for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1246–50.
13. Bruch HP et al. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1189–94.
14. Schultz I et al. Whole gut transit is prolonged after Ripstein rectopexy. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 242–7.
15. Badrek-Amoudi AH et al. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a cause for optimism? Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 575–81.
16. Laubert T et al. Obstructive defecation syndrome: 19 years of experience with laparoscopic resection rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 2013; 17: 307–14.
17. Mackenzie H, Dixon AR. Proficiency gain curve and predictors of outcome for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy. Surgery 2014; 156: 158–67.
18. Owais AE et al. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in male patients with internal or external rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16: 995–1000.
19. Gravie JF, Maigne C. “Wrap technique”: a new operative procedure using a self-adhesive prosthesis for laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19: 361–3.
20. Gultekin FA et al. Safety of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the elderly: results from a nationwide database. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58: 339–43.
21. Abet E et al. Sexual function and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complex rectocoele. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e721–6.
22. Ramage L et al. Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19: 381–9.
23. Faucheron JL et al. Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: technical and functional results. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 5049–55.
24. Gouvas N et al. Ventral colporectopexy for overt rectal prolapse and obstructed defaecation syndrome: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17: O34–46.
25. Rondelli F et al. Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2014; 12(Suppl 2): S153–9.
26. Cadeddu F et al. Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature. Tech Coloproctol 2012; 16: 37–53.
27. Samaranayake CB et al. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 504–12.
28. Shastri-Hurst N, McArthur DR. Laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: will it be the gold standard? Indian J Surg 2014; 76: 461–6.
29. Cullen J, Rosselli JM, Gurland BH. Ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2012; 25: 34–6.
30. Harmston C, Jones O. The evolution of laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse. Int J Surg 2011; 9: 370–3.
31. Senagore AJ. Management of rectal prolapse: the role of laparoscopic approaches. Semin Laparosc Surg 2003; 10: 197–202.
32. Lahr SJ et al., Operative management of severe constipation. Am Surg 1999; 65: 1117–21: discussion 1122-3.
33. Silvis R et al. Abdominal rectovaginopexy - Modified technique to treat constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 82–8.
34. Evans C et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is effective for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome when associated with rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16: O112–6.
35. Schultz I et al. Continence is improved after the Ripstein rectopexy - Different mechanisms in rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception? Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 300–6.
36. Orrom WJ et al. Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 41–6.
37. Tweedie DJ, Varma JS. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 151–5.
38. van den Esschert JW et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defecation syndrome. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2728–32.
39. Portier G et al. Malone antegrade colonic irrigation: ileal neoappendicostomy is the preferred procedure in adults. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 458–60.
40. Johnson E et al. Resection rectopexy for internal rectal intussusception reduces constipation and incomplete evacuation of stool. Eur J Surg Suppl 2003; 588: 51–6.
41. Maggiori L et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective long-term evaluation of functional results and quality of life. Tech Coloproctol 2013; 17: 431–6.
42. Schultz I et al. Long-term results and functional outcome after Ripstein rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 35–43.
43. Wong MTC et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 342–6.
44. Formijne Jonkers HA et al. Evaluation and surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: an international survey. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 115–9.
45. Wong MT et al. Minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocoele: impact on anorectal and sexual function. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: e320–6.
46. Mantoo S et al. Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation? Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: e469–75.
47. Tsunoda A et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectoanal intussusception: postoperative evaluation with proctography. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58: 449–56.
48. Collinson R et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse: short-term functional results. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 97–104.
49. Portier G et al. The effect of abdominal ventral rectopexy on faecal incontinence and constipation in patients with internal intra-anal rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 914–7.
50. Wong M et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocele. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 1019–23.
51. Sileri P et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 622–8.
52. Wahed S et al. Short-term results for laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biological mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 1242–7.
53. Franceschilli L et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19: 209–19.
54. Vermeulen J et al. Anterolateral rectopexy for correction of rectoceles leads to good anatomical but poor functional results. Tech Coloproctol 2005; 9: 35–41; discussion 41.
55. Kargar S et al. Laparoscopic rectopexy in solitary rectal ulcer. Acta Med Iran 2011; 49: 810–3.
56. Formijne Jonkers HA et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and symptomatic rectocele: an analysis of 245 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 695–9.
57. Gosselink MP et al. Impact of slow transit constipation on the outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defaecation associated with high grade internal rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: e749–56.
58. Borie F et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with recto-anal intussusception and rectocele: a valid alternative to STARR procedure in patients with anal sphincter weakness. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2014; 38: 528–34.
59. Powar MP, Ogilvie JW Jr, Stevenson AR. Day-case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: an achievable reality. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 700–6.
60. George R et al. Re: day-case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 1450–1.
61. Pescatori M, Spyrou M and Pulvirenti d'Urso A. A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the ‘iceberg diagram’. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 452–6.