The rush to publication: An editorial and scientific mistake

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 318, Issue 12, 2017, Pages 1109-1110

  Bauchner, Howard ^a  

^a JAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; VALIDITY; HUMAN; TIME FACTOR;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85029945355     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11816     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. Heckers S, Bauchner H, Flanagin A. Retracting, replacing, and correcting the literature for pervasive error in which the results change but the underlying science is still reliable. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(12):1170-1171.
2. Van Noorden R. Science publishing: the trouble with retractions. Nature. 2011;478(7367):26-28.
3. Gorski D. How reproducible is basic lab research in cancer biology? https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/how-reproducible-is-basic-lab-research-in -cancer-biology/. Accessed July 8, 2017.
4. Bauchner H, Golub RM, Fontanarosa PB. Data sharing: an ethical and scientific imperative. JAMA. 2016;315(12):1237-1239.
5. Castelvecchi D. Misconduct verdict stands for Japanesestem-cell researcher. http://blogs.nature.com/news/2014/05/misconduct-verdict-stand-for-japanesestem-cell-researcher.html. Accessed July 8, 2017.
6. Cyranoski D. Papers on “stress-induced” stem cells are retracted. https://www.nature.com/news/papers-on-stress-induced-stem-cells-are -retracted-1.15501. Accessed July 7, 2017.
7. McCook A. The correct values are impossible to establish: embattled nutrition researcher adds long fix to 2005 paper. http://retractionwatch.com/2017 /07/04/correct-values-impossible-establish -embattled-nutrition-researcher-adds-long-fix -2005-paper/. Accessed July 9, 2017.
8. Carlisle JB. Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(8):944-952.
9. Brown N. Exploring John Carlisle's “bombshell” article about fabricated data in RCTs. http://steamtraen.blogspot.com/2017/06/exploring-john -carlisles-bombshell.html. Accessed June 9, 2017.
10. Wilson FP. Fraud in medical research: understanding the Carlisle approach. https://www.methodsman.com/blog/fraud-carlisle. Accessed June 13, 2017.
11. Beall J. What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017;27(2):273-278.
12. Gostin LO, Lucey D, Phelan A. The Ebola epidemic: a global health emergency. JAMA. 2014; 312(11):1095-1096.
13. Fontanarosa PB, Bauchner H, Golub RM. Thank you to JAMA authors, peer reviewers, and readers. JAMA. 2017;317(8):812-813.
14. Bonow RO. JAMA Cardiology inaugural year in review. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(5):473-474.