-
1
-
-
84865403851
-
The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews
-
Booth A, Clarke M, Dooley G, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, Stewart L., 2012. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 1:2. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-2
-
(2012)
Syst Rev
, vol.1
, pp. 2
-
-
Booth, A.1
Clarke, M.2
Dooley, G.3
Ghersi, D.4
Moher, D.5
Petticrew, M.6
Stewart, L.7
-
2
-
-
2442692780
-
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles
-
Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG., 2004. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 291:2457e65. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457
-
(2004)
JAMA
, vol.291
, pp. 2457
-
-
Chan, A.W.1
Hrobjartsson, A.2
Haahr, M.T.3
Gotzsche, P.C.4
Altman, D.G.5
-
3
-
-
77956950113
-
-
Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 63:1205–1215
-
Chavalarias D, Ioannidis JP., 2010. Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 63:1205–1215.
-
(2010)
-
-
Chavalarias, D.1
Ioannidis, J.P.2
-
4
-
-
84902536354
-
Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality
-
Fleming PS, Koletsi D, Seehra J, Pandis N., 2014. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality. J Clin Epidemiol. 67:754–759. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.01.002
-
(2014)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.67
, pp. 754-759
-
-
Fleming, P.S.1
Koletsi, D.2
Seehra, J.3
Pandis, N.4
-
5
-
-
84875743334
-
Cochrane and non-cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
-
Fleming PS, Seehra J, Polychronopoulou A, Fedorowicz Z, Pandis N., 2013. Cochrane and non-cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm? Eur J Orthod. 35:244–248. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs016
-
(2013)
Eur J Orthod
, vol.35
, pp. 244-248
-
-
Fleming, P.S.1
Seehra, J.2
Polychronopoulou, A.3
Fedorowicz, Z.4
Pandis, N.5
-
6
-
-
85100415918
-
-
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.1.0 (updated 2011 Mar); [accessed 2017 Jul 1]
-
Higgins JPT, Green S., 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.1.0 (updated 2011 Mar); [accessed 2017 Jul 1]. http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/cochrane/handbook.htm.
-
(2011)
-
-
Higgins, J.P.T.1
Green, S.2
-
7
-
-
84987732826
-
The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses
-
Ioannidis JP., 2016. The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q. 94:485–514. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12210
-
(2016)
Milbank Q
, vol.94
, pp. 485-514
-
-
Ioannidis, J.P.1
-
8
-
-
84892370875
-
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
-
Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, Schulz KF, Tibshirani R., 2014. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 383:166–175. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8
-
(2014)
Lancet
, vol.383
, pp. 166-175
-
-
Ioannidis, J.P.1
Greenland, S.2
Hlatky, M.A.3
Khoury, M.J.4
Macleod, M.R.5
Moher, D.6
Schulz, K.F.7
Tibshirani, R.8
-
9
-
-
84962329002
-
Demographic characteristics of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials in orthodontic journals with impact factor
-
Kanavakis G, Dombroski MM, Malouf DP, Athanasiou AE., 2016. Demographic characteristics of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials in orthodontic journals with impact factor. Eur J Orthod. 38:57–65. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv012
-
(2016)
Eur J Orthod
, vol.38
, pp. 57-65
-
-
Kanavakis, G.1
Dombroski, M.M.2
Malouf, D.P.3
Athanasiou, A.E.4
-
10
-
-
79151476340
-
Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process
-
Kirkham JJ, Altman DG, Williamson PR., 2010. Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process. PLoS One. 5:e9810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009810
-
(2010)
PLoS One
, vol.5
-
-
Kirkham, J.J.1
Altman, D.G.2
Williamson, P.R.3
-
11
-
-
84872011968
-
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
-
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D., 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 62:e1–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
-
(2009)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.62
, pp. e1-e34
-
-
Liberati, A.1
Altman, D.G.2
Tetzlaff, J.3
Mulrow, C.4
Gøtzsche, P.C.5
Ioannidis, J.P.6
Clarke, M.7
Devereaux, P.J.8
Kleijnen, J.9
Moher, D.10
-
12
-
-
0027142483
-
Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies
-
Maldonado G, Greenland S., 1993. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 138:923–936. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116813
-
(1993)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.138
, pp. 923-936
-
-
Maldonado, G.1
Greenland, S.2
-
13
-
-
69849092717
-
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials
-
Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P., 2009. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 302:977–984. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1242
-
(2009)
JAMA
, vol.302
, pp. 977-984
-
-
Mathieu, S.1
Boutron, I.2
Moher, D.3
Altman, D.G.4
Ravaud, P.5
-
14
-
-
84883038475
-
The problem of duplicate systematic reviews
-
Moher D., 2013. The problem of duplicate systematic reviews. Br Med J. 347:f5040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5040
-
(2013)
Br Med J
, vol.347
, pp. 5040
-
-
Moher, D.1
-
15
-
-
84901230876
-
How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO
-
Moher D, Booth A, Stewart L., 2014. How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO. BJOG. 121:784–786. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12657
-
(2014)
BJOG
, vol.121
, pp. 784-786
-
-
Moher, D.1
Booth, A.2
Stewart, L.3
-
16
-
-
79960590570
-
Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics
-
Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE., 2011. Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Orthod Craniofac Res. 14:116–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01522.x
-
(2011)
Orthod Craniofac Res
, vol.14
, pp. 116-137
-
-
Papageorgiou, S.N.1
Papadopoulos, M.A.2
Athanasiou, A.E.3
-
17
-
-
84893036731
-
Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations
-
Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE., 2014. Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations. Eur J Orthod. 36:74–85. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt008
-
(2014)
Eur J Orthod
, vol.36
, pp. 74-85
-
-
Papageorgiou, S.N.1
Papadopoulos, M.A.2
Athanasiou, A.E.3
-
18
-
-
18644381000
-
Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences
-
Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JP., 2005. Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA. 293:2362–2366. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.19.2362
-
(2005)
JAMA
, vol.293
, pp. 2362-2366
-
-
Patsopoulos, N.A.1
Analatos, A.A.2
Ioannidis, J.P.3
-
19
-
-
80051688693
-
Knowledge of European orthodontic postgraduate students on biostatistics
-
Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T, Taoufik K, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE., 2011. Knowledge of European orthodontic postgraduate students on biostatistics. Eur J Orthod. 33:434–440. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq098
-
(2011)
Eur J Orthod
, vol.33
, pp. 434-440
-
-
Polychronopoulou, A.1
Eliades, T.2
Taoufik, K.3
Papadopoulos, M.A.4
Athanasiou, A.E.5
-
20
-
-
84925354260
-
Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research
-
Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Lynch CD, Fleming PS, Pereira-Cenci T, Moher D., 2015. Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research. J Dent. 43:397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.006
-
(2015)
J Dent
, vol.43
, pp. 397-404
-
-
Sarkis-Onofre, R.1
Cenci, M.S.2
Demarco, F.F.3
Lynch, C.D.4
Fleming, P.S.5
Pereira-Cenci, T.6
Moher, D.7
-
21
-
-
67849127882
-
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
-
Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry DA, Boers M., 2009. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 62:1013–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
-
(2009)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.62
, pp. 1013-1020
-
-
Shea, B.J.1
Hamel, C.2
Wells, G.A.3
Bouter, L.M.4
Kristjansson, E.5
Grimshaw, J.6
Henry, D.A.7
Boers, M.8
-
22
-
-
84882943183
-
Overlapping metaanalyses on the same topic: survey of published studies
-
Siontis KC, Hernandez-Boussard T, Ioannidis JP., 2013. Overlapping metaanalyses on the same topic: survey of published studies. Br Med J. 347:f4501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4501
-
(2013)
Br Med J
, vol.347
, pp. 4501
-
-
Siontis, K.C.1
Hernandez-Boussard, T.2
Ioannidis, J.P.3
-
23
-
-
84875051827
-
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
-
Stewart L, Moher D, Shekelle P., 2012. Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense. Syst Rev. 1:7. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-7
-
(2012)
Syst Rev
, vol.1
, pp. 7
-
-
Stewart, L.1
Moher, D.2
Shekelle, P.3
-
24
-
-
85017464137
-
Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study
-
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi M, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S., 2017. Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol. 84:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.008
-
(2017)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.84
, pp. 54-60
-
-
Tsujimoto, Y.1
Tsujimoto, H.2
Kataoka, Y.3
Kimachi, M.4
Shimizu, S.5
Ikenoue, T.6
Fukuma, S.7
Yamamoto, Y.8
Fukuhara, S.9
-
25
-
-
84952360296
-
ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
-
Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, Davies P, Kleijnen J, Churchill R,; ROBIS group. 2016. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. 69:225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
-
(2016)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.69
, pp. 225-234
-
-
Whiting, P.1
Savović, J.2
Higgins, J.P.3
Caldwell, D.M.4
Reeves, B.C.5
Shea, B.6
Davies, P.7
Kleijnen, J.8
Churchill, R.9
|