메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 249-255

Are orthodontic systematic reviews registered a priori in PROSPERO?

Author keywords

evidence based dentistry; meta analysis; orthodontics; quality; study characteristics; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

DATA EXTRACTION; EUROPE; FISHER EXACT TEST; FUNDING; GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); ORTHODONTICS; PROBABILITY; PUBLICATION; REGISTRATION; RISK FACTOR; SOUTH AMERICA; STATISTICS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; BIBLIOMETRICS; FACTUAL DATABASE;

EID: 85029495805     PISSN: 14653125     EISSN: 14653133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14653125.2017.1370773     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (15)

References (25)
  • 1
    • 84865403851 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews
    • Booth A, Clarke M, Dooley G, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, Stewart L., 2012. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 1:2. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-2
    • (2012) Syst Rev , vol.1 , pp. 2
    • Booth, A.1    Clarke, M.2    Dooley, G.3    Ghersi, D.4    Moher, D.5    Petticrew, M.6    Stewart, L.7
  • 2
    • 2442692780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles
    • Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG., 2004. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 291:2457e65. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457
    • (2004) JAMA , vol.291 , pp. 2457
    • Chan, A.W.1    Hrobjartsson, A.2    Haahr, M.T.3    Gotzsche, P.C.4    Altman, D.G.5
  • 3
    • 77956950113 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 63:1205–1215
    • Chavalarias D, Ioannidis JP., 2010. Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 63:1205–1215.
    • (2010)
    • Chavalarias, D.1    Ioannidis, J.P.2
  • 4
    • 84902536354 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality
    • Fleming PS, Koletsi D, Seehra J, Pandis N., 2014. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality. J Clin Epidemiol. 67:754–759. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.01.002
    • (2014) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.67 , pp. 754-759
    • Fleming, P.S.1    Koletsi, D.2    Seehra, J.3    Pandis, N.4
  • 5
    • 84875743334 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cochrane and non-cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
    • Fleming PS, Seehra J, Polychronopoulou A, Fedorowicz Z, Pandis N., 2013. Cochrane and non-cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm? Eur J Orthod. 35:244–248. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs016
    • (2013) Eur J Orthod , vol.35 , pp. 244-248
    • Fleming, P.S.1    Seehra, J.2    Polychronopoulou, A.3    Fedorowicz, Z.4    Pandis, N.5
  • 6
    • 85100415918 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.1.0 (updated 2011 Mar); [accessed 2017 Jul 1]
    • Higgins JPT, Green S., 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.1.0 (updated 2011 Mar); [accessed 2017 Jul 1]. http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/cochrane/handbook.htm.
    • (2011)
    • Higgins, J.P.T.1    Green, S.2
  • 7
    • 84987732826 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    • Ioannidis JP., 2016. The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q. 94:485–514. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12210
    • (2016) Milbank Q , vol.94 , pp. 485-514
    • Ioannidis, J.P.1
  • 9
    • 84962329002 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Demographic characteristics of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials in orthodontic journals with impact factor
    • Kanavakis G, Dombroski MM, Malouf DP, Athanasiou AE., 2016. Demographic characteristics of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials in orthodontic journals with impact factor. Eur J Orthod. 38:57–65. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv012
    • (2016) Eur J Orthod , vol.38 , pp. 57-65
    • Kanavakis, G.1    Dombroski, M.M.2    Malouf, D.P.3    Athanasiou, A.E.4
  • 10
    • 79151476340 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process
    • Kirkham JJ, Altman DG, Williamson PR., 2010. Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process. PLoS One. 5:e9810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009810
    • (2010) PLoS One , vol.5
    • Kirkham, J.J.1    Altman, D.G.2    Williamson, P.R.3
  • 12
    • 0027142483 scopus 로고
    • Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies
    • Maldonado G, Greenland S., 1993. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 138:923–936. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116813
    • (1993) Am J Epidemiol , vol.138 , pp. 923-936
    • Maldonado, G.1    Greenland, S.2
  • 13
    • 69849092717 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials
    • Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P., 2009. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 302:977–984. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1242
    • (2009) JAMA , vol.302 , pp. 977-984
    • Mathieu, S.1    Boutron, I.2    Moher, D.3    Altman, D.G.4    Ravaud, P.5
  • 14
    • 84883038475 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The problem of duplicate systematic reviews
    • Moher D., 2013. The problem of duplicate systematic reviews. Br Med J. 347:f5040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5040
    • (2013) Br Med J , vol.347 , pp. 5040
    • Moher, D.1
  • 15
    • 84901230876 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO
    • Moher D, Booth A, Stewart L., 2014. How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO. BJOG. 121:784–786. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12657
    • (2014) BJOG , vol.121 , pp. 784-786
    • Moher, D.1    Booth, A.2    Stewart, L.3
  • 16
    • 79960590570 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics
    • Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE., 2011. Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Orthod Craniofac Res. 14:116–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01522.x
    • (2011) Orthod Craniofac Res , vol.14 , pp. 116-137
    • Papageorgiou, S.N.1    Papadopoulos, M.A.2    Athanasiou, A.E.3
  • 17
    • 84893036731 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations
    • Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE., 2014. Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations. Eur J Orthod. 36:74–85. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt008
    • (2014) Eur J Orthod , vol.36 , pp. 74-85
    • Papageorgiou, S.N.1    Papadopoulos, M.A.2    Athanasiou, A.E.3
  • 18
    • 18644381000 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences
    • Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JP., 2005. Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA. 293:2362–2366. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.19.2362
    • (2005) JAMA , vol.293 , pp. 2362-2366
    • Patsopoulos, N.A.1    Analatos, A.A.2    Ioannidis, J.P.3
  • 21
    • 67849127882 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
    • Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry DA, Boers M., 2009. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 62:1013–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
    • (2009) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.62 , pp. 1013-1020
    • Shea, B.J.1    Hamel, C.2    Wells, G.A.3    Bouter, L.M.4    Kristjansson, E.5    Grimshaw, J.6    Henry, D.A.7    Boers, M.8
  • 22
    • 84882943183 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Overlapping metaanalyses on the same topic: survey of published studies
    • Siontis KC, Hernandez-Boussard T, Ioannidis JP., 2013. Overlapping metaanalyses on the same topic: survey of published studies. Br Med J. 347:f4501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4501
    • (2013) Br Med J , vol.347 , pp. 4501
    • Siontis, K.C.1    Hernandez-Boussard, T.2    Ioannidis, J.P.3
  • 23
    • 84875051827 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
    • Stewart L, Moher D, Shekelle P., 2012. Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense. Syst Rev. 1:7. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-7
    • (2012) Syst Rev , vol.1 , pp. 7
    • Stewart, L.1    Moher, D.2    Shekelle, P.3
  • 24
    • 85017464137 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study
    • Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi M, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S., 2017. Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol. 84:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.008
    • (2017) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.84 , pp. 54-60
    • Tsujimoto, Y.1    Tsujimoto, H.2    Kataoka, Y.3    Kimachi, M.4    Shimizu, S.5    Ikenoue, T.6    Fukuma, S.7    Yamamoto, Y.8    Fukuhara, S.9


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.