The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 9, 2017, Pages

  Mongeon, Philippe ^a   Smith, Elise ^a   Joyal, Bruno ^b   Larivière, Vincent ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; REST; WEB OF SCIENCE; WRITING; COOPERATION; PERSONNEL; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; TRENDS;

AUTHORSHIP; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 85029478946     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184601     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lee S, Bozeman B. The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity. Soc Stud Sci. Sage Publications; 2005; 35: 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
2. de Beaver DB, Rosen R. Studies in scientific collaboration. Scientometrics. 1979; 1: 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016966
3. Wuchty S, Jones BBF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science (80-). 2007; 316: 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099 PMID: 17431139
4. Larivière V, Gingras Y, Sugimoto CR, Tsou A. Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015; 66: 1323–1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23266
5. Jones BF, Wuchty S, Uzzi B. Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science. Science (80-). 2008; 322: 1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158357PMID: 18845711
6. Adams JD, Black GC, Clemmons JR, Stephan PE. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Res Policy. 2005; 34: 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.014
7. Defazio D, Lockett A, Wright M. Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Res Policy. 2009; 38: 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008
8. Katz JS, Martin BR. What is research collaboration? Res Policy. 1997; 26: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
9. Bozeman B, Corley E. Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Res Policy. 2004; 33: 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
10. Smith D, Katz JS. Collaborative Approaches to Research [Internet]. A Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England. 2000. http://users.sussex.ac.uk/~sylvank/pubs/collc.pdf
11. Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2001; 52: 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
12. Maienschein J. Why collaborate? J Hist Biol. Springer; 1993; 26: 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01061964
13. Smith CG. Scientific Performance and the Composition of Research Teams. Adm Sci Q. 1971; 16: 486. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391768
14. Larivière V, Desrochers N, Macaluso B, Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A, Sugimoto CR. Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Soc Stud Sci. 2016; 46: 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0306312716650046
15. Rennie D, Yank V. If authors became contributors, everyone would gain, especially the reader. Am J Public Health. American Public Health Association; 1998; 88: 828–830. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.88.5.828
16. Cronin B. Rates of return to citation. J Doc. 1996; 52: 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026967
17. Birnholtz JP. What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. Hoboken; 2006; 57: 1758–1770. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi. 20380
18. Merton RK. Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Am Sociol Rev. 1957; 22: 635. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089193
19. Cetina KK. Epistemic cultures: Forms of reason in science. Hist Polit Econ. 1991; 23: 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-23-1-105
20. Pontille D. La signature scientifique: une sociologie pragmatique de l’attribution. Paris: CNRS; 2004.
21. Ivaniš A, Hren D, Sambunjak D, Marušić M, Marušić A. Quantification of Authors’ Contributions and Eligibility for Authorship: Randomized Study in a General Medical Journal. J Gen Intern Med. Springer; 2008; 23: 1303–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0599-8 PMID: 18521691
22. Ivaniš A, Hren D, Marušić M, Marušić A. Less Work, Less Respect: Authors’ Perceived Importance of Research Contributions and Their Declared Contributions to Research Articles. Ross JS, editor. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e20206. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020206 PMID: 21713036
23. Baerlocher MO, Newton M, Gautam T, Tomlinson G, Detsky AS. The Meaning of Author Order in Medical Research. J Investig Med. LWW; 2007; 55: 174–180. https://doi.org/10.2310/6650.2007.06044PMID: 17651671
24. Mongeon P, Larivière V. Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors’ careers. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016; 67: 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23421
25. Boyack KW, Klavans R, Sorensen AA, Ioannidis JPA. A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996–2011. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013; 43: 1339–1365. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12171 PMID: 24134636
26. Warner ET, Carapinha R, Weber GM, Hill E V, Reede JY. Faculty Promotion and Attrition: The Importance of Coauthor Network Reach at an Academic Medical Center. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31: 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3463-7 PMID: 26173540
27. Pontille D. Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur scientifique. Sci la Société. 2006; 67: 77–93.
28. Zuckerman HA. Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. Am J Sociol. The University of Chicago Press; 1968; 74: 276–291.
29. Waltman L. An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. J Infor-metr. 2012; 6: 700–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008
30. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals [Internet]. 2015 [cited 28 Aug 2016]. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
31. Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, Lundberg GD, et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA. Am Med Assoc; 1998; 280: 222. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.222
32. Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, DeAngelis CD. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ. BMJ Group; 2011; 343: d6128–d6128. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128 PMID: 22028479