The untapped power of soda taxes: Incentivizing consumers, generating revenue, and altering corporate behavior

International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 489-493

  Roache, Sarah A ^a   Gostin, Lawrence O ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Diet and nutrition; Product reformulation; Public health law; Soda taxes; Sugars

Indexed keywords

CARBONATED BEVERAGE; ECONOMICS; FOOD INDUSTRY; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; TAX;

CARBONATED BEVERAGES; FOOD INDUSTRY; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; TAXES;

EID: 85029221451     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23225939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.69     Document Type: Editorial

References (44)

1. Kim D and Kawachi I. Food taxation and pricing strategies to “thin out” the obesity epidemic. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(5):430-437. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.007
2. Arthur R. Locozade Ribena Suntory to cut sugar content of portfolio by 50%. Beverage Daily. http://www.beveragedaily. com/Manufacturers/Lucozade-Ribena-Suntory-sugar-reduction. Accessed April 24, 2017. Published November 10, 2016.
3. Obesity and Overweight Factsheet. World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/. Updated June 2016. Accessed April 24, 2017.
4. Noncommunicable diseases Factsheet. World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs355/en/. Updated April 2017. Accessed April 24, 2017.
5. Kankeu HT, Saksena P, Xu, K, and Evans DB. The financial burden from non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a literature review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013;11:31. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-11-31
6. de Ruyter JC, Olthof MR, Seidell JC, Katan MB. A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(15):1397-1406. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1203034
7. Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Chomitz VR, et al. A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(15):1407-1416. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1203388
8. World Health Organization. Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
9. Nutrition: Sugars. World Health Organization Western Pacific Region website. Accessed April 24, 2017. http://www.wpro.who. int/nutrition_wpr/topics/sugars/en/.
10. Blecher E, Liber AC, Drope JM, Nguyen B, Stoklosa M. Global Trends in the Affordability of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, 1990–2016. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14:160406. doi:10.5888/pcd14.160406
11. World Health Organization. Fiscal Policies for Diet and Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases. Technical Meeting Report; May 5-6, 2015; Geneva, Switzerland. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250131/1/9789241511247-eng.pdf. Accessed April 24, 2017.
12. Gostin LO. 2016: The year of the soda tax. Milbank Q. 2017;95(1):19-23. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12240
13. Falbe J, Thompson HR, Becker CM, Rojas N, McCulloch CE, Madsen KA. Impact of the Berkeley excise tax on sugar sweetened beverage consumption. Am J Pub Health. 2016;106(10):1865-1871. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303362
14. Cochero MA, Rivera-Dommarco JR, Popkin BN, Ng SW. In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Aff. 2017;36(3):564-571. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231
15. Nakhimovsky SS, Feigl AB, Avila C, O’Sullivan G, Macgregor-Skinner E, Spranca M. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce overweight and obesity in middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One 2016;11(9):e0163358. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163358
16. Heise TL, Katikireddi SV, Pega F, et al. Taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;8:CD012319. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012319
17. Brownell KD, Farley T, Willett WC, et al. The Public Health and Economic Benefits of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1599-1605. doi:10.1056/NEJMhpr0905723
18. von Philipsborn P, Stratil JM, Burns J, et al. Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;8:CD12292. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012292
19. City Council of Berkeley, California. Resolution No. 67137 Contract: Berkeley Unified School District for Cooking and Gardening Program. http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/recordsonline/export/16861154.pdf. Accessed April 24, 2017. Published June 30, 2015.
20. City Council of Berkeley, California. Resolution No. 67538 Contract: Funding Allocation $245,874 Healthy Black Families to Implement Thirsty for Change! Program. http://www.ci.berkeley. ca.us/recordsonline/export/16961736.pdf. Accessed April 24, 2017.
21. Centro de Estudios de las Finanzas Públicas. Análisis de los Informes sobre la Situación Económica, las Finanzas Públicas y la Deuda Pública al Cuarto Trimestre de 2014 (cefp/003/2015). Palacio Legislativo de San Lázaro. 10 de marzo de 2015. http://www.cefp.gob.mx/publicaciones/documento/2015/marzo/cefp0032015.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2017.
22. Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, and Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016; 352:h6704. doi:10.1136/bmj.h6704
23. HM Treasury. Finance (No. 2) Bill 2017 Explanatory Notes. March 20, 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/600791/Finance: Bill_2017_Explanatory_Notes.pdf. Accessed April 24, 2017.
24. Finance Act (2017), United Kingdom. Part 2.
25. Barber S and Sutherland N. Funding from the soft drinks industry levy for sport in schools (Debate Pack Number CDP 2017/0006). House of Commons Library. http://researchbriefings.parliament. uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CDP-2017-0006#fullreport. Accessed May 30, 2017. Published January 9, 2017.
26. Geller M. Britain publishes draft sugar tax. Reuters. http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-sugar-tax-idUKKBN13U1ME. Accessed May 30, 2017. Published December 5, 2016.
27. Oxford Economics. The Economic Impact of the Soft Drinks Levy, Final Report. London: Oxford Economics; 2016.
28. Richardson B, van Rens T. Case against soft drink levy is sugar coated. The Conversation. September 27, 2016. http://theconversation.com/case-against-soft-drink-levy-is-sugar- coated-66067. Accessed May 30, 2017.
29. Arthur, R. Tesco reduces sugar in own brand soft drinks. Beverage Daily. November 7, 2016. http://www.beveragedaily. com/Retail-Shopper-Insights/Tesco-reduces-sugar-in-own-brand-soft-drinks. Accessed April 24, 2017.
30. Kottasova, I. Soda wars: The UK’s tax on sugary drinks is working. CNN Money. March 9, 2017. http://money.cnn.com/2017/03/09/news/economy/soda-tax-uk-sugar-revenue/. Accessed April 24, 2017.
31. Policy Paper: Soft Drinks Industry Levy. HM Revenue & Customs website. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/soft-drinks-industry-levy/soft-drinks-industry-levy. Accessed April 24, 2017. Published December 5, 2016.
32. Davies, R. Soft drinks tax raises less money than forecast as firms cut sugar content. The Guardian. March 8, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/mar/08/sugar-tax-will-raise-less-money-than-expected. Accessed April 24, 2017.
33. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
34. Taylor AL, Jacobson MF. Carbonating the world: the marketing and health impact of sugar drinks in low- and middle-income countries. Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest; 2016.
35. Powell LM, Chriqui JF, Khan T, Wada R, Chaloupka FJ. Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes. Obes Rev. 2013;14(2):110-128. doi:10.1111/obr.12002
36. Campaign Finance Dashboards—June 7, 2016 and November 8, 2016. San Francisco Ethics Commission website. http://www. sfethics.org/ethics/2016/06/campaign-finance-dashboards-june-7-2016-and-november-8-2016-elections.html. Accessed April 24, 2017.
37. Aubrey A. Judges Take Up Big Soda’s Suit To Abolish Philadelphia’s Sugar Tax. National Public Radio. April 5, 2017. http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/04/05/522626223/judges-take-up-big-sodas-suit-to-abolish-philadelphias-sugar-tax. Accessed May 25, 2017.
38. Petition debate on sugary drinks tax. Commons Select Committee website. November 25, 2015. https://www.parliament. uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/petitions-committee/news-parliament-2015/sugary-drinks-tax-petition-debate1/. Accessed April 24, 2017.
39. Perlroth N. Spyware’s Odd Targets: Backers of Mexico’s Soda Tax. New York Times. February 11, 2017. https://www.nytimes. com/2017/02/11/technology/hack-mexico-soda-tax-advocates.html. Accessed April 24, 2017.
40. de Freytas-Tamura K. France Bans Free Soda Refills in Attack on Obesity. New York Times. January 27, 2017. https://www. nytimes.com/2017/01/27/world/europe/france-soda-refill-ban.html. Accessed April 24, 2017.
41. Gostin L, Reeve BH, Ashe M. The historic role of boards of health in local innovation: New York City’s soda portion case. JAMA. 2015;312(15):1511-1512. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.12498
42. Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, et al. Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD011045. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2
43. Ley 26.905 sobre Promoción de la reducción del consumo de sodio en la población. Argentina; 2013.
44. Regulations Relating to the Reduction of Sodium in Certain Foodstuffs and Related Matters. South Africa; 2013.