2016: The Year of the Soda Tax

Milbank Quarterly

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 19-23

  Gostin, Lawrence O ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DENTAL CARIES; ENERGY DRINK; FOOD INDUSTRY; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OBESITY; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; SOFT DRINK; SWEETENED BEVERAGE; TAX; UNITED STATES; CARBONATED BEVERAGE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; STANDARDS;

CARBONATED BEVERAGES; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; OBESITY; TAXES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85014544034     PISSN: 0887378X     EISSN: 14680009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12240     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Falbe J, Thompson HR, Beckeret CM, et al. Impact of the Berkeley excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Am J Pub Health. 2016;106(10):1865-1871.
2. Reeve B, Ashe M, Farias R, Gostin L. State and municipal innovations in obesity policy: why localities remain a necessary laboratory for innovation. Am J Pub Health. 2015;105(3):442-48.
3. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2015–2020. 8th ed. 2016. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/resources/2015-2020_Dietary_Guidelines.pdf.
4. Colchero A, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016;352:h6704. http://www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.h6704.
5. San Francisco Ethics Commission. Campaign Finance Dashboards—June 7, 2016 and November 8, 2016 Elections. http://www.sfethics.org/ethics/2016/06/campaign-finance-dashboards-june-7-2016-and-november-8-2016-elections.html.