Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2017, Pages

  Lavia, Carlo ^a   Dallorto, Laura ^a   Maule, Milena ^a   Ceccarelli, Manuela ^b   Fea, Antonio Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b CITTÀ DELLA SALUTE E DELLA SCIENZA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AB INTERNO CANALOPLASTY; ARTICLE; BEST CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG USE; EXCIMER LASER TRABECULOTOMY; FUGO PLASMA BLADE; GLAUCOMA SURGERY; GONISCOPY ASSISTED TRANSLUMINAL TRABECULOTOMY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPHTHALMOLOGICAL IMPLANT; OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRABECTOME; TRABECULOTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL FIELD; EYE SURGERY; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES;

GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OPHTHALMOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85029209179     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183142     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90(3):262–267. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 PMID: 16488940
2. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma. 4th edition. Savona, Italy. Editrice PubliComm, 2014.
3. Newman-Casey PA, Robin AL, Blachley T, Farris K, Heisler M, Resnicow K et al. The Most Common Barriers to Glaucoma Medication Adherence: A Cross-Sectional Surv Ophthalmol. 2015; 122(7):1308–1316.
4. Schwartz GF, Quigley HA. Adherence and persistence with glaucoma therapy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008; 53 Suppl1:S57–68.
5. Schuman JS. Antiglaucoma medications: a review of safety and tolerability issues related to their use. Clin Ther. 2000; 22(2):167–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88478-7 PMID: 10743979
6. Dreer LE, Girkin C, Mansberger SL. Determinants of medication adherence to topical glaucoma therapy. J Glaucoma. 2012; 21(4):234–240. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821dac86 PMID: 21623223
7. Gedde SJ, Singh K, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ. Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012; 23(2):118–126. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff2d1 PMID: 22249235
8. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL. Tube versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 153(5):789–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.026 PMID: 22245458
9. Francis BA, Singh K, Lin SC, Hodapp E, Jampel HD, Samples JR et al. Novel glaucoma procedures: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(7):1466–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.028 PMID: 21724045
10. Saheb H, Ahmed II. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012; 23(2):96–104. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7 PMID: 22249233
11. Caprioli J, Kim JH, Friedman DS, Kiang T, Moster MR, Parrish RK 2nd et al. Special Commentary: Supporting Innovation for Safe and Effective Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Summary of a Joint Meeting of the American Glaucoma Society and the Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, February 26, 2014. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(9):1795–1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.029 PMID: 25881513
12. Richter GM, Coleman AL. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: current status and future prospects. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016; 10:189–206. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S80490 PMID: 26869753
13. Brandão LM, Grieshaber MC. Update on Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) and New Implants. J Ophthalmol. 2013; 2013:705915. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/705915 PMID: 24369494
14. Manasses DT, Au L. The New Era of Glaucoma Micro-stent Surgery. Ophthalmol Ther. 2016; 5(2):135–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-016-0054-6 PMID: 27314234
15. Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
16. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016; 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 PMID: 27733354
17. Friedrich JO, Adhikari NK, Beyene J. The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-32 PMID: 18492289
18. Higgins JP, White IR and Anzures-Cabrera J. Meta-analysis of skewed data: combining results reported on log-transformed or raw scales. Stat Med 2008; 27:6072–6092. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3427 PMID: 18800342
19. Alba AC, Alexander PE, Chang J, MacIsaac J, DeFry S, Guyatt GH. High statistical heterogeneity is more frequent in meta-analysis of continuous than binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 70:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.005 PMID: 26386323
20. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315:629–634. PMID: 9310563
21. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50(4):1088–1101. PMID: 7786990
22. Gonnermann J, Bertelmann E, Pahlitzsch M, Maier AK, Torun N, Klamann MK. Contralateral eye comparison study in MICS & MIGS: Trabectome® vs. iStent inject®. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017; 255(2):359–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3514-8 PMID: 27815624
23. Khan M, Saheb H, Neelakantan A, Fellman R, Vest Z, Harasymowycz P, et al. Efficacy and safety of combined cataract surgery with 2 trabecular microbypass stents versus ab interno trabeculotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41(8):1716–1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.061 PMID: 26432130
24. Klamann MK, Gonnermann J, Maier AK, Ruokonen PC, Torun N, Joussen AM, et al. Combined clear cornea phacoemulsification in the treatment of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma associated with cataract: significance of trabecular aspiration and ab interno trabeculectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013; 251(9):2195–2199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2408-2 PMID: 23812010
25. Kurji K, Rudnisky CJ, Rayat JS, Arora S, Sandhu S, Damji KF, et al. Phaco-trabectome versus phaco-iStent in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017; 52(1):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.06.018 PMID: 28237158
26. Pahlitzsch M, Gonnermann J, Maier AK, Torun N, Bertelmann E, Joussen AM, et al. Trabeculectomy Ab Interno in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Exfoliative Glaucoma. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2015; 232(10):1198–1207. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-105941 PMID: 26512851
27. Ting JL, Damji KF, Stiles MC. Trabectome Study Group. Ab interno trabeculectomy: outcomes in exfoliation versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38(2):315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.08.043 PMID: 22322166
28. Pahlitzsch M, Gonnermann J, Maier AK, Bertelmann E, Klamann MK, Erb C. Modified goniotomy as an alternative to trabectome in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: 1 year results. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017; 52(1):92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.07.011 PMID: 28237157
29. Arriola-Villalobos P, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Díaz-Valle D, Fernández-Pérez C, GarcÍa-Sánchez J, García-Feijoó J. Combined iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation and phacoemulsification for coexistent open-angle glaucoma and cataract: a long-term study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96 (5):645–649. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300218 PMID: 22275344
30. Craven ER, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Giamporcaro JE. iStent Study Group. Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38(8):1339–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025 PMID: 22814041
31. Fea AM, Consolandi G, Zola M, Pignata G, Cannizzo P, Lavia C, et al. Micro-Bypass Implantation for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Combined with Phacoemulsification: 4-Year Follow-Up. J Ophthalmol. 2015; 2015:795357. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/795357 PMID: 26587282
32. Spiegel D, Wetzel W, Neuhann T, Stuermer J, Hoeh H, Garcia-Feijoo J, et al. Coexistent primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: interim analysis of a trabecular micro-bypass stent and concurrent cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009; 19(3):393–399. PMID: 19396784
33. Arriola-Villalobos P, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Diaz-Valle D, Morales-Fernandez L, Fernandez-Perez C, Garcia-Feijoo J. Glaukos iStent inject® Trabecular Micro-Bypass Implantation Associated with Cataract Surgery in Patients with Coexisting Cataract and Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Long-Term Study. J Ophthalmol. 2016; 2016:1056573. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1056573 PMID: 27882243
34. Belovay GW, Naqi A, Chan BJ, Rateb M, Ahmed II. Using multiple trabecular micro-bypass stents in cataract patients to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38(11):1911–1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.017 PMID: 22980724
35. Fernández-Barrientos Y, García-Feijoó J, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Pablo LE, Fernández-Pérez C, García Sánchez J. Fluorophotometric study of the effect of the glaukos trabecular microbypass stent on aqueous humor dynamics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51(7):3327–3332. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-3972 PMID: 20207977
36. Katz LJ, Erb C, Carceller GA, Fea AM, Voskanyan L, Wells JM, et al. Prospective, randomized study of one, two, or three trabecular bypass stents in open-angle glaucoma subjects on topical hypotensive medication. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015; 9:2313–2320. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S96695 PMID: 26715834
37. Ahmed II, Katz LJ, Chang DF, Donnenfeld ED, Solomon KD, Voskanyan L, et al. Prospective evaluation of microinvasive glaucoma surgery with trabecular microbypass stents and prostaglandin in open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40(8):1295–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.07.004 PMID: 25088627
38. Donnenfeld ED, Solomon KD, Voskanyan L, Chang DF, Samuelson TW, Ahmed II, et al. A prospective 3-year follow-up trial of implantation of two trabecular microbypass stents in open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015; 9:2057–2065. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S91732 PMID: 26604675
39. Fea AM, Belda JI, Rękas M, Jünemann A, Chang L, Pablo L, et al. Prospective unmasked randomized evaluation of the iStent inject (®) versus two ocular hypotensive agents in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014; 8:875–882. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S59932 PMID: 24855336
40. Lindstrom R, Lewis R, Hornbeak DM, Voskanyan L, Giamporcaro JE, Hovanesian J, et al. Outcomes Following Implantation of Two Second-Generation Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stents in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma on One Medication: 18-Month Follow-Up. Adv Ther. 2016; 33(11):2082–2090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0420-8 PMID: 27739003
41. Vold SD, Voskanyan L, Tetz M, Auffarth G, Masood I, Au L, et al. Newly Diagnosed Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Randomized to 2 Trabecular Bypass Stents or Prostaglandin: Outcomes Through 36 Months. Ophthalmol Ther. 2016; 5(2):161–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-016-0065-3 PMID: 27619225
42. Voskanyan L, García-Feijoó J, Belda JI, Fea A, Jünemann A, Baudouin C. Synergy Study Group. Prospective, unmasked evaluation of the iStent® inject system for open-angle glaucoma: synergy trial. Adv Ther. 2014; 31(2):189–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-014-0095-y PMID: 24452726
43. Vold S, Ahmed II, Craven ER, Mattox C, Stamper R, Packer M, et al. Two-Year COMPASS Trial Results: Supraciliary Microstenting with Phacoemulsification in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(10):2103–2112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032 PMID: 27506486
44. García-Feijoo J, Rau M, Grisanti S, Grisanti S, Höh H, Erb C, et al. Supraciliary Micro-stent Implantation for Open-Angle Glaucoma Failing Topical Therapy: 1-Year Results of a Multicenter Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015; 159(6):1075–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.02.018 PMID: 25747677
45. Pérez-Torregrosa VT, Olate-Pérez Á, Cerdà-Ibáñez M, Gargallo-Benedicto A, Osorio-Alayo V, Barreiro-Rego A, et al. Combined phacoemulsification and XEN45 surgery from a temporal approach and 2 incisions. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2016; 91(9):415–21 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2016.02.006 PMID: 26995503
46. Pfeiffer N, Garcia-Feijoo J, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Larrosa JM, Fea A, Lemij H, et al. A Randomized Trial of a Schlemm’s Canal Microstent with Phacoemulsification for Reducing Intraocular Pressure in Open-Angle Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(7):1283–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.031 PMID: 25972254
47. Gandolfi SA, Ungaro N, Ghirardini S, Tardini MG, Mora P. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Canaloplasty and Schlemm’s Canal Scaffold at 24 Months’ Follow-Up. J Ophthalmol. 2016; 2016:3410469. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3410469 PMID: 26989497
48. Fea AM, Ahmed II, Lavia C, Mittica P, Consolandi G, Motolese I, et al. Hydrus microstent compared to selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary open angle glaucoma: one year results. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017; 45(2):120–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12805 PMID: 27449488
49. Töteberg-Harms M, Hanson JV, Funk J. Cataract surgery combined with excimer laser trabeculotomy to lower intraocular pressure: effectiveness dependent on preoperative IOP. BMC Ophthalmol. 2013; 13:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-13-24 PMID: 23799932
50. Babighian S, Rapizzi E, Galan A. Efficacy and safety of ab interno excimer laser trabeculotomy in primary open-angle glaucoma: two years of follow-up. Ophthalmologica. 2006; 220(5):285–290. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094616 PMID: 16954703
51. Babighian S, Caretti L, Tavolato M, Cian R, Galan A. Excimer laser trabeculotomy vs 180 degrees selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary open-angle glaucoma. A 2-year randomized, controlled trial. Eye (Lond). 2010; 24(4):632–638.
52. Samuelson TW, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Duh YJ, Giamporcaro JE. US iStent Study Group. Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(3):459–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.007 PMID: 20828829
53. Arriola-Villalobos P, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Díaz-Valle D, García-Vidal SE, Fernández-Pérez C, García-Sánchez J, et al. Mid-term evaluation of the new Glaukos iStent with phacoemulsification in coexistent open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct; 97 (10):1250–5 https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302394 PMID: 23603758
54. Parrish RK, Palmberg P, Sheu WP; XLT Study Group. A comparison of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 12-week, randomized, masked-evaluator multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135(5):688–703. PMID: 12719078
55. Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW, Schulze R Jr. Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes: evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(11):1946–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.061 PMID: 19878828
56. Shrivastava A, Singh K. The effect of cataract extraction on intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010; 21(2):118–122. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360ac3 PMID: 20040874
57. Melancia D, Abegão Pinto L, Marques-Neves C. Cataract surgery and intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Res. 2015; 53(3):141–148. https://doi.org/10.1159/000377635 PMID: 25765255
58. Fogagnolo P, Centofanti M, Figus M, Frezzotti P, Fea A, Ligorio P, et al. Short-term changes in intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmologica. 2012; 228(3):154–158. https://doi.org/10.1159/000337838 PMID: 22572718
59. Fea A.M., Dorin G. Laser treatment of glaucoma: Evolution of laser trabeculoplasty techniques. 2008; 6 (2):45–52
60. Baudouin C, Labbé A, Liang H, Pauly A, Brignole-Baudouin F. Preservatives in eyedrops: the good, the bad and the ugly. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010; 29(4):312–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.03.001 PMID: 20302969