Intermediate ecosystem services: An empty concept?

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 27, Issue , 2017, Pages 124-126

  Potschin Young, Marion ^a   Czúcz, Balint ^b   Liquete, Camino ^c   Maes, Joachim ^c   Rusch, Graciela M ^d   Haines Young, Roy ^a  

^a FABIS CONSULTING LTD   (United Kingdom)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^c JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^d NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029183256     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bebi, P., Kulakowski, D., Rixen, C., Snow avalanche disturbances in forest ecosystems—State of research and implications for management. For. Ecol. Manage. 257:9 (2009), 1883–1892.
2. Boyd, J., Banzhaf, S., What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol. Econ. 63:2 (2007), 616–626.
3. de Bello, F., Lavorel, S., Díaz, S., Harrington, R., Cornelissen, J.H., Bardgett, R.D., Harrison, P.A., Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers. Conserv. 19:10 (2010), 2873–2893.
4. Danley, B., Widmark, C., Evaluating conceptual definitions of ecosystem services and their implications. Ecol. Econ. 126 (2016), 132–138.
5. Díaz, S., Purvis, A., Cornelissen, J.H., Mace, G.M., Donoghue, M.J., Ewers, R.M., Jordano, P., Pearse, W.D., Functional traits, the phylogeny of function, and ecosystem service vulnerability. Ecol. Evol. 3:9 (2013), 2958–2975.
6. European Commission, 2016. Report on phase 1 of the knowledge innovation project on an integrated system of natural capital and ecosystem services accounting in the EU (KIP-INCA Phase 1 report). Public version 15 September 2016. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/capital_accounting/index_en.htm.
7. Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., Morling, P., Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 68:3 (2009), 643–653.
8. Garibaldi, L.A., Carvalheiro, L.G., Vaissière, B.E., Gemmill-Herren, B., Hipólito, J., Freitas, B.M., Ngo, H.T., Azzu, N., Sáez, A., Åström, J., An, J., Mutually beneficial pollinator diversity and crop yield outcomes in small and large farms. Science 351:6271 (2016), 388–391.
9. Jax, K., Function and “functioning” in ecology: what does it mean?. Oikos 111 (2005), 641–648.
10. Jax, K., Ecosystem functions: a critical perspective. Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R., Turner, R.K., (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016, Routledge, London and New York, 42–44.
11. Johnston, R.J., Russell, M., An operational structure for clarity in ecosystem service values. Ecol. Econ. 70:12 (2011), 2243–2249.
12. Lamarque, P., Lavorel, S., Mouchet, M., Quétier, F., Plant trait-based models identify direct and indirect effects of climate change on bundles of grassland ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111:38 (2014), 13751–13756.
13. La Notte, A., D'Amato, D., Mäkinen, H., Paracchini, M.L., Liquete, C., Egoh, B., Geneletti, D., Crossman, N.D., Ecosystem services classification: a systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecol. Ind. 74 (2017), 392–402.
14. Lavorel, S., Grigulis, K., Lamarque, P., Colace, M.P., Garden, D., Girel, J., Douzet, R., Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 99:1 (2011), 135–147.
15. Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Defining and measuring ecosystem services. Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R., Turner, R.K., (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016, Routledge, London and New York, 25–44.
16. Price, A., 2015. Shake in oak: an evidence review. Forestry Commission Research Report. https://www.forestry.gov.uk/PDF/FCRP024.pdf/$FILE/FCRP024.pdf.
17. Rusch, V.E., Rusch, G.M., Goijman, A., Varela, S., Claps, L., Ecosystem services to support environmental and socially sustainable decision-making. Ecología Austral 27 (2017), 162–176.
18. Saarikoski, H., Jax, K., Harrison, P.A., Primmer, E., Barton, D.N., Mononen, L., Furman, E., Exploring operational ecosystem service definitions: the case of boreal forests. Ecosyst. Serv. 14 (2015), 144–157.
19. Schröter, M., Remme, R.P., Hein, L., How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes?. Ecol. Ind. 23 (2012), 220–221.
20. Semmens, D.J., Diffendorfer, J.E., López-Hoffman, L., Shapiro, C.D., Accounting for the ecosystem services of migratory species: quantifying migration support and spatial subsidies. Ecol. Econ. 70:12 (2011), 2236–2242.
21. Stokes, A., Atger, C., Bengough, A.G., Fourcaud, T., Sidle, R.C., Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides. Plant Soil 324:1–2 (2009), 1–30.
22. UNSD, 2017. SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting: Technical Recommendations. Consultation Draft. V4.1: 6 March 2017. Prepared as part of the joint UNEP/UNSD/CBD project on Advancing Natural Capital Accounting funded by NORAD. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/eea_project/TR_consultation/SEEA_EEA_Tech_Rec_Consultation_Draft_II_v4.1_March2017.pdf.
23. Villamagna, A.M., Angermeier, P.L., Bennett, E.M., Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol. Complexity 15 (2013), 114–121.
24. Wallace, K.J., Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol. Conserv. 139:3 (2007), 235–246.