Plant trait-based models identify direct and indirect effects of climate change on bundles of grassland ecosystem services

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 38, 2014, Pages 13751-13756

  Lamarque, Pénélope ^a   Lavorel, Sandra ^a   Mouchet, Maud ^b   Quétier, Fabien ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^b NONE   (France)

Author keywords

Global change; Mountain agriculture; Plant functional traits; Trade offs

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLIMATE CHANGE; GENETICS; GRASSLAND; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

CLIMATE CHANGE; GRASSLAND; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANTS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

EID: 84907280005     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216051111     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(11): 5242-5247.
2. Nelson E, et al. (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7(1): 4-11.
3. Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4(11): e379.
4. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12(12): 1394-1404.
5. de Bello F, et al. (2010) Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers Conserv 19(10): 2873-2893.
6. Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett 8(5): 468-479.
7. Lavorel S, Grigulis K (2012) How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale-up to trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services. J Ecol 100(1): 128-140.
8. Lavorel S, et al. (2011) Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J Ecol 99(1): 135-147.
9. Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functionning from plant traits: Revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16: 545-556.
10. Bohensky EL, Reyers B, Van Jaarsveld AS (2006) Future ecosystem services in a Southern African river basin: A scenario planning approach to uncertainty. Conserv Biol 20(4): 1051-1061.
11. Thuiller W, Araujo MB, Lavorel S (2004) Do we need land-use to model species distributions in Europe? J Biogeogr 31: 353-361.
12. Grêt-Regamey A, Bebi P, Bishop ID, Schmid WA (2008) Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region. J Environ Manage 89(3): 197-208.
13. Gascoigne WR, et al. (2011) Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA. Ecol Econ 70(10): 1715-1725.
14. Lamarque P, et al. (2013) Taking into account farmers' decision making to map finescale land management adaptation to climate and socio-economic scenarios. Landsc Urban Plan 119(2013): 147-157.
15. Grigulis K, et al. (2013) Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services. J Ecol 101(1): 47-57.
16. Lamarque P, Quétier F, Lavorel S (2011) The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. C R Biol 334(5-6): 441-449.
17. Carpenter SR, et al. (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(5): 1305-1312.
18. Mottet A, Ladet S, Coque N, Gibon A (2006) Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: A case study in the Pyrenees. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114(24): 296-310.
19. Martin G, Felten B, Duru M (2011) Forage rummy: A game to support the participatory design of adapted livestock systems. Environ Model Softw 26(12): 1442-1453.
20. Nettier B, Dobremez L, Coussy JL, Romagny T (2010) Attitudes of livestock farmers and sensitivity of livestock farming systems to drought conditions in the French Alps. J Alp Res 98(1): 383-400.
21. Robson TM, Baptist F, Clement JC, Lavorel S (2010) Land use in subalpine grasslands affects nitrogen cycling via changes in plant community and soil microbial uptake dynamics. J Ecol 98(1): 62-73.
22. Quétier F, Thebault A, Lavorel S (2007) Plant traits in a state and transition framework as markers of ecosystem response to land-use change. Ecol Monogr 77(1): 33-52.
23. Coûteaux MM, Bottner P, Berg B (1995) Litter decomposition, climate and liter quality. Trends Ecol Evol 10(2): 63-66.
24. Quétier F, Liancourt P, Thébault A, Davies ID, Lavorel S (2011) Assessing long-term land-use legacies in subalpine grasslands by using a plant trait-based generic modelling framework. Plant Ecol Divers 4(4): 391-402.
25. Gross N, Liancourt P, Choler P, Suding KN, Lavorel S (2010) Strain and vegetation effect on local limiting resources explain the outcome of biotic interactions. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 12: 9-19.
26. Díaz S, et al. (2007) Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(52): 20684-20689.
27. Grassein F (2009) Mécanismes de variation des traits fonctionnels dans les prairies des Alpes. PhD thesis (Université Jospeh Fourier, Grenoble, France).
28. Ansquer P (2006) Caractérisation agroécologique des végétations prairiales naturelles en réponse aux pratiques agricoles: Apports pour la construction d'outils de diagnostic. PhD thesis (Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, Toulouse, France).
29. Benot M-L, et al. (2013) How extreme summer weather may limit control of Festuca paniculata by mowing in subalpine grasslands. Plant Ecol Divers 6(3-4): 393-404.
30. Rodríguez JP, et al. (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11(1): 28.