Development of a team interaction observation protocol and a self-efficacy survey using social cognitive theory as a framework

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Purzer, Senay Yasar ^a,b   Baker, Dale ^a   Roberts, Chell ^a,c   Krause, Stephen ^a,d  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Communication in Science Inquiry Project ^*

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Arizona State University

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; STUDENTS;

ENGINEERING DESIGN PROBLEMS; ENGINEERING EDUCATORS; FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; NEGATIVE CORRELATION; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

SURVEYS;

EID: 85029074159     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Ohland, M., Pomeranz, H.R., and Feinstein, H.W. (2006). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: A new peer evaluation instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Society for Engineering Education.
2. http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml#For-Engineering-Programs-Only
3. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Collier/Macmillan
4. Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T., and Smith, Karl A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Report on Higher Education. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
5. Johnson, D., Johnson, R.& Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6. Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler M.G.M., & Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching Science Problem Solving: An Overview of Experimental Work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 442-468.
7. She, H. (1999). Students' knowledge construction in small groups in the seventh grade biology laboratory: Verbal communication and physical engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1051-1066.
8. Southerland, S., Kittleson, J., Settlage, J., and Lanier, K. (2005). Individual and group meaning-making in an urban third grade classroom: red fog, cold cans, and seeping vapor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 1032-1061.
9. Bandura (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective, Annual. Reviews of Psychology. 52, 1-26.
10. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
11. Pajares, F. ( 2007) viewed on January 2, 2007. http://www.des.emory.edu/ mfp/eff.html
12. Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., and Bieschke, K.J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relations to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424-430.
13. Hutchinson, M.A., D.K. Follman, M. Sumpter, and G.M. Bodner (2006). Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 39-47.
14. Pajares, F. and Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of Self-Efficacy and Self-Concept Beliefs in Mathematical Problem Solving: A Path Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193-203.
15. Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., and Bieschke, K.J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relations to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424-430.
16. McCarthy, P., Meier, S., & Rinderer, R. (1985). Self-efficacy and writing. College Composition and Communication, 36, 465-471.
17. Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337-354.
18. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.
19. Pajares, F.,Hartley, J., and Valiante, G. (2001.) Response Format in Writing Self-Efficacy Assessment: Greater Discrimination Increases Prediction. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 214-221.
20. Kaartinen, S., & Kumpulainen, K. (2002). Collaborative inquiry and the construction of explanations in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 189-212.
21. Sizmur, S. & Osborne, J. (1997). Learning processes and collaborative concept mapping. International Journal of Science Education, 79(10), 1117-1135.
22. Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1996). Analysing design activity. Chichester: Wiley.
23. Brereton, M.F., Cannon, M.C., Mabogunje, A., Leiter, L, "Collaboration in Design Teams: How Social Interaction Shapes the Product," in Analyzing Design Activity, K. Dorst, H. Christiaans, H. Cross, (Editors). Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1996.
24. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication