Introducing a "Ways of Thinking" framework for student engineers learning to do design

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Lande, Micah ^a   Leifer, Larry ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Mechanical Engineering Design   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; PRODUCT DESIGN; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION; ENGINEERING DESIGN; ENGINEERING THINKINGS; LEARNING COURSE; STANFORD UNIVERSITY; STUDENT DESIGN PROJECTS; STUDENT ENGINEERS; WAYS OF THINKING;

DESIGN;

EID: 85029069711     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Lande, M and L Leifer, "Classifying Student Engineering Design Project Types," In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference, San Diego, California, March 19-20, 2009.
2. http://me310.stanford.edu
3. Snow, CP," Two Cultures", Science Vol. 130, No. 3373, 1959, pp. 419.
4. Gold, R, The Plenitude, MIT Press, 2007.
5. Stefik, M, and B Stefik, Breakthrough: Stories and Strategies of Radical Innovation: MIT Press, 2004.
6. Dym, C, Sheppard, S, Agogino, A, Leifer, L, Frey, D, Eris, O, "Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning," Journal of Engineering Education, 2005.
7. Robinson, JA, "Engineering Thinking and Rhetoric", Journal of Engineering Education, 1998.
8. Cardella, ME, Engineering Mathematics: an Investigation of Students' Mathematical Thinking from a Cognitive Engineering Perspective, Thesis (Ph. D.) University of Washington, 2006.
9. Ishii, K, "Introduction to Design for Manufacturability (DFM)," ME317 class notes, Stanford University, 2005.
10. Saffo, P, "Six Rules for Effective Forecasting," Harvard Business Review Vol. 85, No. 7/8, 2007, pp. 122.
11. Atman, CJ, Bursic, KM, "Verbal Protocol Analysis as a Method to Document Engineering Student Design Processes," Journal of Engineering Education, 1998.
12. Crawley, EF, "Creating the CDIO Syllabus: A Universal Template for Engineering Education," ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002.
13. Schön, D, The Reflective Practitioner: Basic Books, 1983.
14. Bucciarelli, L, Designing Engineers, MIT Press, 1994.
15. http://foresight.stanford.edu
16. http://www-design.stanford.edu/PD
17. http://dschool.stanford.edu
18. http://spdl.stanford.edu
19. http://mml.stanford.edu
20. Stanford University Registrar, Stanford Bulletin, 1953-2008.
21. Cardella, ME, Lande, M, "Responding to Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Engineering Design," Presented at DTRS7: Design Thinking Research Symposium 7, September 2007.
22. Prince, MJ, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," Journal of Engineering Education, July 2004, pp. 1-9.
23. Prince, MJ, RM Felder, "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases," Journal of Engineering Education, April 2006, pp. 1-16.
24. Todd, RH, SP Magleby, CD Sorensen, BR Swan, DK Anthony, "A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America," Journal of Engineering Education, April 1995, pp. 165-174.
25. Dutson, AJ, RH Todd, SP Magleby, CD Sorensen, RH Todd, "A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses," Journal of Engineering Education, January 1997, pp. 17-28.