Comparing engineering student use of solution manuals and student/ faculty perceptions of academic dishonesty

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Minichiello, Angela L ^a   McNeill, Laurie S ^a   Hailey, Christine E ^a  

^a Utah State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SURVEYS; TEACHING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS; TEXTBOOKS;

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS; ELECTRONIC TEXTBOOKS; ENGINEERING MECHANICS; ENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATES; STATICS AND DYNAMICS; TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS; UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING COURSE; UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85029041489     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Widmann, J., & Shollenberger, K. (2006). Student use of textbook solution manuals: Student and faculty perspectives in a large mechanical engineering department. Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
2. Widmann, J., Shollenberger, K., & Kennedy, J. (2007). Student use of author's textbook solution manuals: Effect on student learning of mechanics fundamentals. Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Honolulu, HI.
3. Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., Finelli, C. J., Montgomery, S. M. & Passow, H.J. (2006). Engineering students' perceptions of and attitudes towards cheating. Journal of Engineering Education, 95:3, 181-194.
4. Novotney, A. (2011, June). Beat the cheat. Monitor on Psychology, 42:6, 54.
5. Passow, H.J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S. & Carpenter, D. C. (2006). Factors influencing engineering students' decisions to cheat by the type of assessment. Research in Higher Education, 47:6, 643-684.
6. Meade, J. (1992, March). Cheating: Is academic dishonesty par for the course? ASEE Prism, 1, 30-2.
7. Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
8. McCabe D. L. & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64:5, 522-538.
9. McCabe D. L., & Trevino, L.K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education. 38:3, 379-396.
10. Toppo, G. (2011, December 16). eCheating: Students spin a web of deceit in tests. USA Today, p. 1A.
11. Lynch, L. (2011, September 16). Cheating in school: How the digital age affects cheating and plagarism. [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.schools.com/visuals/academic-dishonesty.html
12. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
13. Cronbach, L.J. (with Shapiro, K.). (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
14. Cronbach, L.J., Ambron, S.R., Dornbusch, S.M., Hess, R.D., Hornik, R.C., Phillips, D.C., Walker, D.F., and Weiner, S.S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
15. National Research Council. Advancing Scientific Research in Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.
16. ABET, Inc. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2012-2013. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/engineering-criteria-2012-2013.
17. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 10(2 & 3), 249-260.
18. Chi, M.T.H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.