Representations of student model development in virtual laboratories based on a cognitive apprenticeship instructional design

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Seniow, Kendra ^a   Nefcy, Eric ^a   Kelly, Christine ^a   Koretsky, Milo ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPRENTICES; BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; E-LEARNING; EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; ITERATIVE METHODS; SOFTWARE DESIGN; STUDENTS;

COGNITIVE APPRENTICESHIP; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNS; INSTRUCTIONAL LABORATORIES; INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES; SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING; STATISTICAL VARIATIONS; UNDERGRADUATE LABORATORY;

LABORATORIES;

EID: 85029030009     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Gilbert, J., C. Boulter, and R. Elmer. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. Gilbert and C. Boulter (eds.) Developing Models in Science Education (Dordrecht: Kluwer). 3-18.
2. Koretsky, M.D., D. Amatore, C. Barnes, and S. Kimura, "Enhancement of student learning in experimental design using a virtual laboratory," IEEE Transactions on Education 51, 76 (2008).
3. Kelly, C., E. Gummer, P. Harding and M.D. Koretsky, "Teaching Experimental Design using Virtual Laboratories: Development, Implementation and Assessment of the Virtual Bioreactor Laboratory," Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2008).
4. Koretsky, M.D., C. Kelly, P. Harding, and E. Gummer, "Comparison of Student Perceptions of Virtual and Physical Laboratories, "Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2009).
5. Shavelson, R.J., M.A. Ruiz-Primo, and E.W. Wiley. (2005). Windows into the mind. Higher Education. 49:413-430.
6. Li, M., and R.J. Shavelson. (2001). Examining the linkage between science achievement and assessment. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
7. Shavelson, R., M.A. Ruiz-Primo, M. Li, and C.C. Ayala (2003). Evaluating New Approaches to Assessing Learning. Center for the Study of Evaluation Report, UCLA.
8. Ruiz-Primo, M.A. (2009). Towards an assessment framework for 21st Century skills. Invited commission paper to National Academy of Science.
9. Frank, M. (2006). Knowledge, Abilities and Cognitive Characteristics and Behavioral Competencies of Engineers with High Capacity for Engineering Systems Thinking (CEST). Systems Engineering. 9:91-103.
10. Darabi, A. Aubteen, David W. Nelson, Norbert M. Seel. (2009). Progression of mental models throughout the phases of a computer-based instructional simulation: Supportive information, practice, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior 25:723-730.
11. Ertmer, P.A., D.A. Stepich, C.S. York, A. Stickman, L. Wu, S. Zurek, and Y. Goktas. (2008). How instructional design experts use knowledge and experience to solve ill-structured problems. Performance Improvement Quarterly 21:17-42.
12. M. Enghag, P. Gustafson, and G. Jonsson. (2007). From Everyday Life Experiences to Physics Understanding Occurring in Small Group Work with Context Rich Problems During Introductory Physics Work at University Research in Science Education, 37: 449-467.