Life cycle assessment of orange peel waste management

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Volumn 127, Issue , 2017, Pages 148-158

  Negro, Viviana ^a   Ruggeri, Bernardo ^a   Fino, Debora ^a   Tonini, Davide ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Animal feeding; Incineration; Limonene; Pyrolysis

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; CITRUS FRUITS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUTROPHICATION; FEEDING; FERTILIZERS; GLOBAL WARMING; INCINERATION; LIFE CYCLE; PYROLYSIS; WASTE INCINERATION; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; ANIMAL FEEDING; CONSEQUENTIAL LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); LIMONENE; MANAGEMENT SCENARIOS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INCINERATION; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; POLICY ANALYSIS; PYROLYSIS; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE TECHNOLOGY;

ACIDIFICATION; AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; COMPOSTING; ECOTOXICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; EUTROPHICATION; FEEDING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; INCINERATION; LANDFILL; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; NITRATE LEACHING; ORANGE (FRUIT); ORANGE PEEL WASTE; OZONE DEPLETION; PYROLYSIS; RECYCLING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOLID WASTE; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ITALY;

ANIMALIA; CITRUS;

EID: 85028928124     PISSN: 09213449     EISSN: 18790658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alvarado-Morales, M., Boldrin, A., Karakashev, D.B., Holdt, S.L., Angelidaki, I., Astrup, T., Life cycle assessment of biofuel production from brown seaweed in Nordic conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 129 (2013), 92–99, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.029.
2. Angelidaki, I., Ellegaard, L., Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants: status and future trends. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 109 (2003), 95–106, 10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:95.
3. Assogasmetano, 2016. ASSOGASMETANO [WWW Document]. URL http://www.assogasmetano.it (Accessed 1 October 2016).
4. Astrup, T.F., Tonini, D., Turconi, R., Boldrin, A., Life cycle assessment of thermal waste-to-energy technologies: review and recommendations. Waste Manag. 37 (2015), 104–115, 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.06.011.
5. ATO, 2015. Verifica di fattibilità per la formazione di una struttura societaria integrata del sistema di gestione dei rifiuti nell'ambito territoriale torinese. Relazione conclusiva del gruppo di lavoro [WWW Document]. URL http://www.atorifiutitorinese.it/cms/ente/atti-e-documenti/documentitc (Accessed 20 January 2017).
6. Bacenetti, J., Bava, L., Zucali, M., Lovarelli, D., Sandrucci, A., Tamburini, A., Fiala, M., Anaerobic digestion and milking frequency as mitigation strategies of the environmental burden in the milk production system. Sci. Total Environ. 539 (2016), 450–459, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.015.
7. Bampidis, V.A., Robinson, P.H., Citrus by-products as ruminant feeds: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 128 (2006), 175–217, 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.12.002.
8. Blengini, G.A., Brizio, E., Cibrario, M., Genon, G., LCA of bioenergy chains in Piedmont (Italy): a case study to support public decision makers towards sustainability. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 57 (2011), 36–47, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.003.
9. Boldrin, A., Andersen, J.K., Møller, J., Christensen, T.H., Favoino, E., Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Manag. Res. 27 (2009), 800–812, 10.1177/0734242x09345275.
10. Boldrin, A., Neidel, T.L., Damgaard, A., Bhander, G.S., Møller, J., Christensen, T.H., Modelling of environmental impacts from biological treatment of organic municipal waste in EASEWASTE. Waste Manag. 31 (2011), 619–630, 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.025.
11. Broeren, M.L.M., Zijp, M.C., Waaijers-van der Loop, S.L., Heugens, E.H.W., Posthuma, L., Worrell, E., Shen, L., Environmental assessment of bio-based chemicals in early-stage development: a review of methods and indicators. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining, 2017, 10.1002/bbb.1772.
12. Callaway, T.R., Carroll, J.A., Arthington, J.D., Edrington, T.S., Anderson, R.C., Rossman, M.L., Carr, M.A., Genovese, K.J., Ricke, S.C., Crandall, P., Nisbet, D.J., Orange peel products can reduce Salmonella populations in Ruminants. FOODBORNE Pathog. Dis. 8 (2011), 1071–1075, 10.1089/fpd.2011.0867.
13. Caparra, P., Foti, F., Scerra, M., Sinatra, M.C., Scerra, V., Solar-dried citrus pulp as an alternative energy source in lamb diets: effects on growth and carcass and meat quality. Small Rumin. Res. 68 (2007), 303–311, 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.11.015.
14. Clavreul, J., Guyonnet, D., Christensen, T.H., Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. Waste Manag. 32 (2012), 2482–2495, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.008.
15. Clavreul, J., Baumeister, H., Christensen, T.H., Damgaard, A., An environmental assessment system for environmental technologies. Environ. Model. Softw. 60 (2014), 18–30, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.06.007.
16. Crawshaw, R., Co-product feeds: animal feeds from the food and drinks industries. J. Sci. Food Agric., 83, 2003, 362, 10.1002/jsfa.1326.
17. Dalgaard, R., Schmidt, J., Halberg, N., Christensen, P., Thrane, M., Pengue, W.A., LCA of soybean meal. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13 (2008), 240–254, 10.1065/lca2007.06.342.
18. de Besi, M., McCormick, K., Towards a bioeconomy in europe: national, regional and industrial strategies. Sustainability 7 (2015), 10461–10478, 10.3390/su70810461.
19. de Man, R., Friege, H., Circular economy: european policy on shaky ground. Waste Manag. Res. 34 (2016), 93–95, 10.1177/0734242x15626015.
20. De Vries, J.W., Vinken, T.M.W.J., Hamelin, L., De Boer, I.J.M., Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono-and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy—a life cycle perspective. Bioresour. Technol. 125 (2012), 239–248.
21. Doni, S., Macci, C., Longo, V., Souid, A., Garcia, C., Masciandaro, G., Innovative system for biochemical monitoring of degraded soils restoration. CATENA 152 (2017), 173–181, 10.1016/j.catena.2017.01.016.
22. EC, 1999. Landfill waste – Environment – European Commission [WWW Document]. URL http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/landfill_index.htm (Accessed 18 January 2017).
23. EC, 2000. The Waste Incineration Directive – Environment – European Commission [WWW Document]. URL http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/air/stationary/wid/legislation.htm (Accessed 18 January 2017).
24. EUROSTAT, 2016. Consumer prices of petroleum products, end of second half 2015 (EUR per litre) YB16. png – Statistics Explained [WWW Document]. URL http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/File:Consumer_prices_of_petroleum_products,_end_of_second_half_2015_(EUR_per_litre)_YB16.png (Accessed 18 January 2017).
25. Ecoinvent Center, 2015. ecoinvent Version 3 [WWW Document]. URL http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/database.html (Accessed 18 January 2017).
26. Ekvall, T., Azapagic, A., Finnveden, G., Rydberg, T., Weidema, B.P., Zamagni, A., Attributional and consequential LCA in the ILCD handbook. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21 (2016), 293–296, 10.1007/s11367-015-1026-0.
27. El-Shimi, S.A., El-Housseini, M., Ali, B.E., El-Shinnawi, M.M., Biogas generation from food-processing wastes. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 6 (1992), 315–327, 10.1016/0921-3449(92)90055-7.
28. Energistyrelsen, 2012. Technology Data For Energy Plants. Generation of Electricity and District Heating, Energy Storage and Energy Carrier Generation and Conversion. Copenhagen.
29. Evangelisti, S., Lettieri, P., Borello, D., Clift, R., Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study. Waste Manag. 34 (2014), 226–237, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.013.
30. Fantin, V., Giuliano, A., Manfredi, M., Ottaviano, G., Stefanova, M., Masoni, P., Environmental assessment of electricity generation from an Italian anaerobic digestion plant. Biomass Bioenergy 83 (2015), 422–435, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.10.015.
31. Feedipedia, 2016. Feedipedia: An on-line encyclopedia of animal feeds|Feedipedia [WWW Document]. URL http://www.feedipedia.org/ (Accessed 18 January 2017).
32. Ferrari, A., Morone, P., Tartiu, V., Tackling uncertainty through business plan analysis—a case study on citrus waste valorisation in the south of Italy. Agriculture, 6, 2016, 5, 10.3390/agriculture6010005.
33. Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., Suh, S., Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 91 (2009), 1–21, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018.
34. Forgács, G., Pourbafrani, M., Niklasson, C., Taherzadeh, M.J., Hováth, I.S., Methane production from citrus wastes: process development and cost estimation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 87 (2012), 250–255, 10.1002/jctb.2707.
35. Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D.W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D.C., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., Schulz, M., Van, R., Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. Chapter 2. Climate Change 2007. The Physical Science Basis, 2007.
36. Forster-Carneiro, T., Berni, M.D., Dorileo, I.L., Rostagno, M.A., Biorefinery study of availability of agriculture residues and wastes for integrated biorefineries in Brazil. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 77 (2013), 78–88, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.05.007.
37. Göhl, B., 1978. Citrus by-products for animal feed [WWW Document]. URL http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/x6512e/X6512E08.htm (Accessed 10 January 2017).
38. Guinée, J.B., Gorrée, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., Koning, A., de Oers, L., van Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Suh, S., Udo de Haes, H.A., Bruijn, H., de Duin, R., van Huijbregts, M.A.J., Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
39. Hamelin, L., Wesnæs, M., Wenzel, H., Petersen, B.M., Environmental consequences of future biogas technologies based on separated slurry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2011), 5869–5877, 10.1021/es200273j.
40. Hamelin, L., Naroznova, I., Wenzel, H., Environmental consequences of different carbon alternatives for increased manure-based biogas. Appl. Energy 114 (2014), 774–782, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.033.
41. Hauschild, M.Z., Goedkoop, M., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., Jolliet, O., Margni, M., De Schryver, A., Humbert, S., Laurent, A., Sala, S., Pant, R., Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18 (2013), 683–697, 10.1007/s11367-012-0489-5.
42. IEA, 2014. IEA – Report [WWW Document]. URL http://www.iea.org/statistics/statisticssearch/report/?country=ITALY&product=NaturalGas&year=2010 (Accessed 5 June 2017).
43. ISO 14040, 2006. ISO 14040:2006 – Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework [WWW Document]. URL http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=37456 (Accessed 21 June 2017).
44. ISO 14044, 2006. ISO 14044:2006 – Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines [WWW Document]. URL http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=38498 (Accessed 21 June 2017).
45. Lejonklev, J., Løkke, M.M., Larsen, M.K., Mortensen, G., Petersen, M.A., Weisbjerg, M.R., Transfer of terpenes from essential oils into cow milk. J. Dairy Sci. 96 (2013), 4235–4241, 10.3168/jds.
46. Manfredi, S., Christensen, T.H., Environmental assessment of solid waste landfilling technologies by means of LCA-modeling. Waste Manag. 29 (2009), 32–43, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.021.
47. Martín, M.A., Siles, J.A., Chica, A.F., Martín, A., Biomethanization of orange peel waste. Bioresour. Technol. 101 (2010), 8993–8999, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.133.
48. Miranda, R., Bustos-Martinez, D., Blanco, C.S., Villarreal, M.H.G., Cantú, M.E.R., Pyrolysis of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) dry peel. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 86 (2009), 245–251, 10.1016/j.jaap.2009.06.001.
49. Negro, V., Mancini, G., Ruggeri, B., Fino, D., Citrus waste as feedstock for bio-based products recovery: review on limonene case study and energy valorization. Bioresour. Technol. 214 (2016), 806–815, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.006.
50. Negro, V., Ruggeri, B., Mancini, G., Fino, D., Recovery of D-limonene through moderate temperature extraction and pyrolytic products from orange peels. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2016, 10.1002/jctb.5107.
51. Ostfoldforskning, 2016. Biogassproduksjon fra m atavfall og møkk fra ku, gris og fjørfe.
52. Panepinto, D., Senor, A., Genon, G., Environmental and Economic Analysis of the Turin Incineration Plant. 2014, WIT Press, 479–490, 10.2495/WM140421.
53. Panoutsou, C., Eleftheriadis, J., Nikolaou, A., Biomass supply in EU27 from 2010 to 2030. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 5675–5686, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.032.
54. Pourbafrani, M., McKechnie, J., Maclean, H.L., Saville, B.A., Life cycle greenhouse gas impacts of ethanol, biomethane and limonene production from citrus waste. Environ. Res. Lett., 8(1), 2013, 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015007.
55. RAV, 2015. Relazione annuale sullo stato dei servizi e sull'attività svolta [WWW Document]. URL http://www.autorita.energia.it/allegati/relaz_ann/15/RAVolumeI_2015.pdf (Accessed 27 September 2016).
56. ReCiPe, 2008. A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level. First Edition Report I: Characterisation [WWW Document]. Minist. Housing, Spat. Plan. Environ. Netherlands. URL http://www.lcia-recipe.net/ (Accessed 18 January 2017).
57. Rosenbaum, R.K., Bachmann, T.M., Gold, L.S., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Jolliet, O., Juraske, R., Koehler, A., Larsen, H.F., MacLeod, M., Margni, M., McKone, T.E., Payet, J., Schuhmacher, M., van de Meent, D., Hauschild, M.Z., USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13 (2008), 532–546, 10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4.
58. Ruiz, B., Flotats, X., Effect of limonene on batch anaerobic digestion of citrus peel waste. Biochem. Eng. J. 109 (2016), 9–18, 10.1016/j.bej.2015.12.011.
59. Seppälä, J., Posch, M., Johansson, M., Hettelingh, J.P., Country-dependent characterisation factors for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication based on accumulated exceedance as an impact category indicator. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11 (2006), 403–416, 10.1065/lca2005.06.215.
60. Shanab, K., Neudorfer, C., Spreitzer, H., Green solvents in organic synthesis: an overview. Curr. Org. Chem. 17:11 (2013), 1179–1187, 10.2174/1385272820666160209212804.
61. Siles, J.A., Vargas, F., Gutiérrez, M.C., Chica, A.F., Martín, M.A., Integral valorisation of waste orange peel using combustion, biomethanisation and co-composting technologies. Bioresour. Technol. 211 (2016), 173–182, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.056.
62. Styles, D., Gibbons, J., Williams, A.P., Stichnothe, H., Chadwick, D.R., Healey, J.R., Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms. GCB Bioenergy 7 (2015), 1034–1049, 10.1111/gcbb.12189.
63. Styles, D., Dominguez, E.M., Chadwick, D., Environmental balance of the of the UK biogas sector: an evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 560–561 (2016), 241–253, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.236.
64. Tamburini, V., Zema, D.A., Citrus – Trattato di agrumicoltura. Vacante, V., (eds.) Il Sole 24 Ore-Edagricole, 2009, 459–470.
65. Tonini, D., Hamelin, L., Wenzel, H., Astrup, T., Bioenergy production from perennial energy crops: a consequential LCA of 12 bioenergy scenarios including land use changes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 13521–13530, 10.1021/es3024435.
66. Tonini, D., Martinez-Sanchez, V., Astrup, T.F., Material resources, energy, and nutrient recovery from waste: are waste refineries the solution for the future?. Env. Sci. Technol., 6(47), 2013, 10.1021/es400998y.
67. Tonini, D., Hamelin, L., Alvarado-Morales, M., Astrup, T.F., GHG emission factors for bioelectricity, biomethane, and bioethanol quantified for 24 biomass substrates with consequential life-cycle assessment. Bioresour. Technol. 208 (2016), 123–133, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.052.
68. Tonini, D., Hamelin, L., Astrup, T.F., Environmental implications of the use of agro-industrial residues for biorefineries: application of a deterministic model for indirect land-use changes. Appl. Energy 8 (2016), 690–706, 10.1111/gcbb.12290.
69. Tufvesson, L.M., Lantz, M., Börjesson, P., Environmental performance of biogas produced from industrial residues including competition with animal feed -life-cycle calculations according to different methodologies and standards. J. Clean. Prod. 53 (2013), 214–223, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.005.
70. Turconi, R., Butera, S., Boldrin, A., Grosso, M., Rigamonti, L., Astrup, T., Life cycle assessment of waste incineration in Denmark and Italy using two LCA models. Waste Manag. Res. 29 (2011), 78–90, 10.1177/0734242x11417489.
71. USDA, 2013. Gain Report [WWW Document]. URL http://gain.fas.usda.gov/RecentGAINPublications/CitrusSemi-annual_Madrid_EU-27_6-12-2013.pdf (Accessed 27 October 2016).
72. Viuda-Martos, M., Ruiz-Navajas, Y., Fernández-López, J., Pérez-Álvarez, J., Antifungal activity of lemon (Citrus lemon L.), mandarin (Citrus reticulata L.), grapefruit (Citrus paradisi L.) and orange (Citrus sinensis L.) essential oils. Food Control 19 (2008), 1130–1138, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.12.003.
73. Volpe, M., Panno, D., Volpe, R., Messineo, A., Upgrade of citrus waste as a biofuel via slow pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 115 (2015), 66–76, 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.06.015.
74. Wang, H., Wang, L., Shahbazi, A., Life cycle assessment of fast pyrolysis of municipal solid waste in North Carolina of USA. J. Clean. Prod. 87 (2015), 511–519, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.011.
75. Weidema, B.P., Ekvall, T., Heijungs, R., 2009. Guidelines for application of deepened and broadened LCA Guidelines for application of deepened and broadened LCA Deliverable D18 of work package 5 of the CALCAS project [WWW Document]. URL http://www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/publications/calcas_report_d18.pdf (Accessed 27 October 2016).
76. Weidema, B., 2003. Market information in life cycle assessment. Environmental Project No. 863. Danish Environmental Protection Agency [WWW Document]. URL http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.197.5739&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Accessed 27 October 2016).
77. Wilkins, M.R., Suryawati, L., Maness, N.O., Chrz, D., Ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces marxianus in the presence of orange-peel oil. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23 (2007), 1161–1168, 10.1007/s11274-007-9346-2.
78. Yoo, J.H., Lee, H.B., Choi, S.W., Kim, Y.B., Sumathy, B., Kim, E.K., Production of an antimicrobial compound by Bacillus subtilis LS 1–2 using a citrus-processing byproduct. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 28 (2011), 1400–1405, 10.1007/s11814-010-0516-9.
79. Yoshida, H., Nielsen, M.P., Scheutz, C., Jensen, L.S., Bruun, S., Christensen, T.H., Long-term emission factors for land application of treated organic municipal waste. Environ. Model. Assess. Environ. Model. Assess 21 (2016), 111–124, 10.1007/s10666-015-9471-5.