A mouse mastitis model to study the effects of the intramammary infusion of a food-grade Lactococcus lactis strain

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 9, 2017, Pages

  Camperio, Cristina ^a,b   Armas, Federica ^a,c   Biasibetti, Elena ^b   Frassanito, Paolo ^a   Giovannelli, Carlo ^a   Spuria, Liliana ^b   D’Agostino, Claudia ^a   Tait, Sabrina ^a   Capucchio, Maria Teresa ^b   Marianelli, Cinzia ^a  

^a ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^c ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERLEUKIN 1BETA; PROBIOTIC AGENT; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR; AUTACOID; CYTOKINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL SURVIVAL; CELL INFILTRATION; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOKINE PRODUCTION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INFLAMMATION; INFLAMMATORY CELL; INGUINAL LYMPH NODE; INOCULATION; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; MAMMARY GLAND; MASTITIS; MOUSE; NEUTROPHIL; NONHUMAN; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS CHROMOGENES; TISSUE INJURY; ANIMAL; BIOSYNTHESIS; DISEASE MODEL; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; UDDER;

ANIMALS; CYTOKINES; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; INFLAMMATION MEDIATORS; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; MAMMARY GLANDS, ANIMAL; MASTITIS; MICE;

EID: 85028917506     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184218     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Contreras A, Sierra D, Sanchez A, Corrales JC, Marco JC, Paape MJ, et al. Mastitis in small ruminants. Small Rumin Res. 2007; 68: 145–153.
2. Haftu R, Taddele H, Gugsa G, Kalayou S. Prevalence, bacterial causes, and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of mastitis isolates from cows in large-scale dairy farms of Northern Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012; 44:1765–1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0135-z PMID: 22476790
3. Halasa T, Huijps K, Østerås O, Hogeveen H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: a review. Vet Q. 2007; 29: 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2007.9695224 PMID: 17471788
4. Tiwari JG, Babra C, Tiwari HK, Williams V, Wet SD, Gibson J, et al. (2013) Trends In Therapeutic and Prevention Strategies for Management of Bovine Mastitis: An Overview. J Vaccines Vaccin. 4: 176.
5. Cao LT, Wu JQ, Xie F, Hu SH, Mo Y. Efficacy of nisin in treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 90: 3980–3985. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0153 PMID: 17639009
6. Wu J, Hu S, Cao L. Therapeutic effect of nisin Z on subclinical mastitis in lactating cows. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51: 3131–3135. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00629-07 PMID: 17606675
7. Ryan MP, Flynn J, Hill C, Ross RP, Meaney WJ. The natural food grade inhibitor, lacticin 3147, reduced the incidence of mastitis after experimental challenge with Streptococcus dysgalactiae in nonlactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1999; 82: 2625–2631.
8. Twomey DP, Wheelock AI, Flynn J, Meaney WJ, Hill C, Ross RP. Protection against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy cows using a bismuth-based teat seal containing the bacteriocin, lacticin 3147. J Dairy Sci. 2000; 83: 1981–1988. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75075-2 PMID: 11003227
9. Klostermann K, Crispie F, Flynn J, Ross RP, Hill C, Meaney W. Intramammary infusion of a live culture of Lactococcus lactis for treatment of bovine mastitis: comparison with antibiotic treatment in field trials. J Dairy Res. 2008; 75: 365–373.
10. Greene WA, Gano AM, Smith KL, Hogan JS, Todhunter DA. Comparison of probiotic and antibiotic intramammary therapy of cattle with elevated somatic cell counts. J Dairy Sci. 1991; 74: 2976–2981.
11. Armas F, Camperio C, Marianelli C. In vitro assessment of the probiotic potential of Lactococcus lactis LMG 7930 against ruminant mastitis-causing pathogens. PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0169543. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169543 PMID: 28068371
12. Chandler RL. Experimental bacterial mastitis in the mouse. J Med Microbiol 1970; 3: 273–282.
13. Notebaert S, Meyer E. Mouse models to study the pathogenesis and control of bovine mastitis. A review. Vet Q. 2006; 28: 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2006.9695201 PMID: 16605156
14. Brouillette E, Grondin G, Talbot BG, Malouin F. Inflammatory cell infiltration as an indicator of Staphylococcus aureus infection and therapeutic efficacy in experimental mouse mastitis. Vet Immunol Immuno-pathol. 2005; 104: 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.11.006 PMID: 15734537
15. Brouillette E, Malouin F. The pathogenesis and control of Staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis: study models in the mouse. Microbes Infect. 2005; 7: 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2004.11.008 PMID: 15777742
16. Nazemi S, Aalbæk B, Kjelgaard-Hansen M, Safayi S, Klærke DA, Knight CH. Expression of acute phase proteins and inflammatory cytokines in mouse mammary gland following Staphylococcus aureus challenge and in response to milk accumulation. J Dairy Res. 2014; 81: 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029914000454 PMID: 25230141
17. Zhao Y, Zhou M, Gao Y, Liu H, Yang W, Yue J, et al. Shifted T helper cell polarization in a murine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis model. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0134797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0134797 PMID: 26230498
18. Brouillette E, Grondin G, Lefebvre C, Talbot BG, Malouin F. Mouse mastitis model of infection for antimicrobial compound efficacy studies against intracellular and extracellular forms of Staphylococcus aureus. Vet Microbiol. 2004; 101: 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.04.008 PMID: 15261998
19. Breyne K, De Vliegher S, De Visscher A, Piepers S, Meyer E. Technical note: a pilot study using a mouse mastitis model to study differences between bovine associated coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98: 1090–1100. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8699 PMID: 25497801
20. Tabacchioni S, Visca P, Chiarini L, Bevivino A, Di Serio C, Fancelli S, et al. Molecular characterization of clinical and environmental isolates of Burkholderia cepacia. Res Microbiol. 1995; 146: 531–542. PMID: 8577994
21. Biasibetti E, Amedeo S, Brugiapaglia A, Destefanis G, Di Stasio L, Valenza F, et al. Lipomatous muscular "dystrophy" of Piedmontese cattle. Animal 2012; 6: 1839–1847. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S175173111200081X PMID: 22717052
22. Chen F, Liu B, Wang D, Wang L, Deng X, Bi C, et al. Role of sortase A in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis in mice. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014; 351: 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12354 PMID: 24330077
23. Notebaert S, Demon D, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P, Meyer E. Inflammatory mediators in Escherichia coli-induced mastitis in mice. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 31: 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2007.10.004 PMID: 18243314
24. Hibbing ME, Fuqua C, Parsek MR, Peterson SB. Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010; 8: 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2259 PMID: 19946288
25. Baxter FO, Came PJ, Abell K, Kedjouar B, Huth M, Rajewsky K, et al. IKKbeta/2 induces TWEAK and apoptosis in mammary epithelial cells. Development 2006; 133: 3485–3494. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02502 PMID: 16887827
26. Stein T, Morris JS, Davies CR, Weber-Hall SJ, Duffy MA, Heath VJ, et al. Involution of the mouse mammary gland is associated with an immune cascade and an acute-phase response, involving LBP, CD14 and STAT3. Breast Cancer Res. 2004; 6: R75–91. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr753 PMID: 14979920
27. O’Brien J, Martinson H, Durand-Rougely C, Schedin P. Macrophages are crucial for epithelial cell death and adipocyte repopulation during mammary gland involution. Development 2012; 139: 269–275.
28. Ingman WV, Glynn DJ, Hutchinson MR. Mouse models of mastitis–how physiological are they? Int Breastfeed J. 2015; 10:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-015-0038-5 PMID: 25848399