In vitro assessment of the probiotic potential of Lactococcus lactis LMG 7930 against ruminant mastitis-causing pathogens

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Armas, Federica ^a,b   Camperio, Cristina ^a,c   Marianelli, Cinzia ^a  

^a ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

^b ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMIKACIN; AMPICILLIN; CHLORAMPHENICOL; CIPROFLOXACIN; CLARITHROMYCIN; ERYTHROMYCIN; GENTAMICIN; KANAMYCIN; LINEZOLID; PROBIOTIC AGENT; RIFAMPICIN; STREPTOMYCIN; TETRACYCLINE; VANCOMYCIN; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ANIMAL CELL; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BOVINE; BREAST EPITHELIUM CELL; CELL INVASION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GROWTH INHIBITION; HYDROPHOBICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERNALIZATION; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; MASTITIS; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS CHROMOGENES; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; STREPTOCOCCUS AGALACTIAE; STREPTOCOCCUS DYSGALACTIAE; STREPTOCOCCUS INTERMEDIUS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASES; ANTIBIOSIS; FEMALE; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; MICROBIOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; RUMINANT; VETERINARY;

ANIMAL DISEASES; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ANTIBIOSIS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; FEMALE; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; MASTITIS; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; PHENOTYPE; PROBIOTICS; RUMINANTS;

EID: 85009108019     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169543     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Halasa T, Huijps K, Østerås O, Hogeveen H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: a review. Vet Q. 2007; 29:18-31 doi: 10.1080/01652176.2007.9695224 PMID: 17471788
2. Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Zadoks RN. Invited Review: The role of cow, pathogen and treatment regimen in the therapeutic success of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 2006; 89:1877-1895 doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72256-1 PMID: 16702252
3. Sears PM, Smith BS, Stewart WK, Gonzalez RN, Rubino SD, Gusik SA, et al. Evaluation of a nisinbased germicidal formulation on teat skin of live cows. J Dairy Sci. 1992; 75: 3185-3190 doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78083-7 PMID: 1460143
4. Cao LT, Wu JQ, Xie F, Hu SH, Mo Y. Efficacy of nisin in treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 90: 3980-3985. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0153 PMID: 17639009
5. Wu J, Hu S, Cao L. Therapeutic effect of nisin Z on subclinical mastitis in lactating cows. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51: 3131-3135. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00629-07 PMID: 17606675
6. Crispie F, Alonso-Gómez M, O'Loughlin C, Klostermann K, Flynn J, Arkins S, et al. Intramammary infusion of a live culture for treatment of bovine mastitis: effect of live lactococci on the mammary immune response. J Dairy Res. 2008; 75: 374-384 doi: 10.1017/S0022029908003385 PMID: 18680623
7. Klostermann K, Crispie F, Flynn J, Ross RP, Hill C, Meaney W. Intramammary infusion of a live culture of Lactococcus lactis for treatment of bovine mastitis: comparison with antibiotic treatment in field trials. J Dairy Res. 2008; 75: 365-373. doi: 10.1017/S0022029908003373 PMID: 18680622
8. Frola ID, Pellegrino MS, Magnano G, Giraudo JA, Espeche MC, Nader-Macias ME, et al. Histological examination of non-lactating bovine udders inoculated with Lactobacillus perolens CRL 1724. J Dairy Res. 2013; 80: 28-35. doi: 10.1017/S0022029912000581 PMID: 23199568
9. Enriquez-Valencia CE, Serna-Cock L, Campos-Gaona R. Intramammary infusion of Weissella confusa affects somatic cells counts and milk differential leukocyte count. Ciencia Rural 2015; 45: 835-841.
10. Espeche MC, Otero MC, Sesma F, Nader-Macias ME. Screening of surface properties and antagonistic substances production by lactic acid bacteria isolated from the mammary gland of healthy and mastitic cows. Vet Microbiol. 2009; 135: 346-357. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.078 PMID: 19041199
11. Espeche MC, Pellegrino M, Frola I, Larriestra A, Bogni C, Nader-Macías ME. Lactic acid bacteria from raw milk as potentially beneficial strains to prevent bovine mastitis. Anaerobe. 2012; 18: 103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.01.002 PMID: 22261519
12. Bouchard DS, Rault L, Berkova N, Le Loir Y, Even S. Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus invasion into bovine mammary epithelial cells by contact with live Lactobacillus casei. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 79: 877-885. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03323-12 PMID: 23183972
13. Frola ID, Pellegrino MS, Espeche MC, Giraudo JA, Nader-Macias ME, Bogni CI. Effects of intramammary inoculation of Lactobacillus perolens CRL1724 in lactating cows' udders. J Dairy Res. 2012; 79: 84-92. doi: 10.1017/S0022029911000835 PMID: 22077995
14. Bouchard DS, Seridan B, Saraoui T, Rault L, Germon P, Gonzalez-Moreno C, et al. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from bovine mammary microbiota: potential allies against bovine mastitis. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0144831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144831 PMID: 26713450
15. Assis BS, Germon P, Silva AM, Even S, Nicoli JR, Le Loir Y. Lactococcus lactis V7 inhibits the cell invasion of bovine mammary epithelial cells by Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Benef Microbes. 2015; 6: 879-886. doi: 10.3920/BM2015.0019 PMID: 26322541
16. Balouri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: a review. J Pharm Anal. 2016; 6:71-79.
17. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(6):2740. [10 pp.]. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal
18. Xu H, Jeong HS, Lee HY, Ahn J. Assessment of cell surface properties and adhesion potential of selected probiotic strains. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009; 49: 434-442. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009. 02684.x PMID: 19725886
19. Handley PS, Harty DW, Wyatt JE, Brown CR, Doran JP, Gibbs AC. A comparison of the adhesion, coaggregation and cell-surface hydrophobicity properties of fibrillar and fimbriate strains of Streptococcus salivarius. J Gen Microbiol. 1987; 133: 3207-3217. doi: 10.1099/00221287-133-11-3207 PMID: 2895798
20. Mezaini A, Chihib NE, Bouras AD, Nedjar-Arroume N, Hornez JP. Antibacterial activity of some lactic acid bacteria isolated from an Algerian dairy product. J Environ Public Health. 2009; 2009:678495 doi: 10.1155/2009/678495 PMID: 20041021
21. Haguingan JMB, Gordoncillo MJN, Bautista JAN, Hikiba M, Samago IG. Detection and identification of bacterial carriage of subclinical mastitis cases in backyard dairy cows. Philipp J et Med. 2010; 47: 21-25.
22. Wyder AB, Boss R, Naskova J, Kaufmann T, Steiner A, Graber HU. Streptococcus spp. and related bacteria: their identification and their pathogenic potential for chronic mastitis-a molecular approach. Res Vet Sci. 2011; 91: 349-357. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.09.006 PMID: 20971488
23. Plumed-Ferrer C, Uusikylä K, Korhonen J, von Wright A. Characterization of Lactococcus lactis isolates from bovine mastitis. Vet Microbiol. 2013; 167: 592-599. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.09.011 PMID: 24080351
24. Batt CA. Encyclopedia of food microbiology. 2nd ed. Academic press; 2014
25. Collado MC, Surono I, Meriluoto J, Salminen S. Indigenous Dadih lactic acid bacteria: cell-surface properties and interactions with pathogens. J Food Sci. 2007; 72: M89-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007. 00294.x PMID: 17995806
26. Dias FS, Duarte F, Schwan F. Evaluation of adhesive properties of presumptive probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Bioscience J. 2013; 29: 1678-1686.
27. Pelletier C, Bouley C, Cayuela C, Bouttier S, Bourlioux P, Bellon-Fontaine MN. Cell surface characteristics of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997; 63: 1725-1731. PMID: 9143109
28. Hamadi F, Latrache H, El Ghmari A, Ellouali M, Mabrrouki M, Kouider N. Effect of pH and ionic strength on hydrophobicity and electron donor and acceptor characteristics of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Microbiol. 2004; 54: 213-225.
29. Oliveira R, Azeredo J, Teixeira P, Fonseca AP. The role of hydophobiciy in bacterial adhesion. 2011 BioLine. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.625.340&rep=rep1&type=pdf
30. Abdulla AA, Abed TA, Saeed AM. Adhesion, autoaggregation and hydrophobicity of six Lactobacillus Strains. Br Microbiol Res J. 2014; 4: 381-391.
31. Del Re B, Sgorbati B, Miglioli M, Palenzona D. Adhesion, autoaggregation and hydrophobicity of 13 strains of Bifidobacterium longum. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2000; 31: 438-442. PMID: 11123552
32. Mamo W, Froman G. Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to bovine mammary epithelial cells induced by growth in milk whey. Microbiol Immunol. 1994; 38: 305-308. PMID: 7935050
33. Even S, Bouchard D, Le Loir Y. Lactic acid bacteria to modulate virulence excpression in pathogenic bacteria: an alternative to Killing? In: Pessione Enrica, editor. Interactive probiotics. CRS Press; 2014. pp. 52-80.