Identifying and understanding attitudinal diversity on multi-functional changes in woodlands of the Ukrainian Carpathians

Climate Research

Volumn 73, Issue 1-2, 2017, Pages 45-56

  Nijnik, Albert ^a   Nijnik, Maria ^b   Kopiy, Serhiy ^c   Zahvoyska, Lyudmyla ^c   Sarkki, Simo ^d   Kopiy, Leonid ^c   Miller, David ^b  

^a Environmental Network Limited   (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UKRAINIAN NATIONAL FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (Ukraine)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Carpathian Mountains; Ecosystem based adaptation practices; Public attitudes and preferences; Q method

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY; WOODLAND;

CARPATHIANS;

EID: 85028908557     PISSN: 0936577X     EISSN: 16161572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3354/cr01448     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barry J, Proops J (1999) Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecol Econ 28: 337-345
2. Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organisations and social learnings. J Env Manage 90:1692-1702
3. Bizikova L, Nijnik M, Kluvanková-Oravská T (2012) Sustaining multifunctional forestry through the developing of social capital and promoting participation: a case of multiethnic mountain communities. Small-scale For 11: 301-319
4. Brown SR (1980) Political subjectivity. Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
5. Brown S (1996) Q methodology and qualitative research. Qual Health Res 6: 561-567
6. Davies BB, Sherlock K, Rauschmayer F (2005) 'Recruitment', 'composition' and 'mandate' issues in deliberative processes: should we focus on arguments rather than individuals? Environ Plan 23: 599-615
7. Elbakidze M, Angelstam P (2013) Sustainable forest management from policy to landscape and back again: a case study in the Ukrainian Carpathians Mountains. In: Kozak J, Ostapowicz K, Bytnerowicz A, Wyzga B (eds) The Carpathians: integrated nature and society towards sustainability. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
8. European Commission (2015) Paris Agreement. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/paris-en (accessed on 1 December 2016)
9. Forestry Commission (2003) UK public opinion survey of forestry.
10. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh Funtowicz SO, Ravetz J (1993) Science for the postnormal age. Futures 25: 739-755
11. Jacobsen CH, Koch NE (1995) Summary report on ongoing research on public perceptions and attitudes on forestry in Europe. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Horsholm
12. Jensen CH, Koch NE (2000) Measuring forest preferences of the population-A Danish approach. Schweiz Z Forstwesen 151: 11-16
13. Karjalainen E, Tyrvainen L (2002) Visualization in forest landscape preference research: a Finnish perspective. Landsc Urban Plan 59: 13-28
14. Keeton WS, Crow SM (2009) Sustainable forest management alternatives for the Carpathian Mountain region: providing a broad array of ecosystem service. In: Soloviy I, Keeton WS (eds) Ecological economics and sustainable forest management: developing a trans-disciplinary ap-proach for the Carpathian Mountains. UNFU Press, Lviv, p 109-126
15. Krott M (2008) Forest government and forest governance within a Europe in change. In: Cesaro L, Gatto P, Pettenella D (eds) The multifunctional role of forests-policies, methods and case studies. EFI Proc. No. 55. Gummerus Printing, Saarijärvi, p 13-25
16. Krynytskyy GT, Chernyavskyy MV (eds) (2014) Close to nature and multifunctional forest management in the Carpathian region of Ukraine and Slovakia. PE "Circle", Uzhorod
17. McKeown B, Thomas B (2013) Q methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
18. Miller DR, Vogt N, Nijnik M, Brondizio E, Fiorini S (2009) Integrating analytical and participatory techniques for planning the sustainable use of land resources and landscapes. In: Geerteman S, Stillwell J (eds) Plan support systems: best practice and new methods. Springer, Dordrecht
19. Muñoz-Rojas J, Nijnik M, Puente MG, Garcia FC (2015) Synergies and conflicts in the use of policy and planning instruments for implementing forest and woodland corridors and networks in Scotland. For Policy Econ 57: 47-64
20. Nijnik M, Miller D (2014) Targeting sustainable provision of forest ecosystem services with special focus on carbon sequestration. In: Matyssek R, Clarke N, Cudlín P, Mikkelsen T, Tuovinen JP, Wiesser G, Paoletti E (eds): Climate change, air pollution and global challenges: understanding and perspectives from forest research. Elsevier, Oxford, p 547-565
21. Nijnik M, Oskam A (2004) Governance in Ukrainian forestry: trends, impacts and remedies. Int J Agric Resour Gov Ecol 3: 116-133
22. Nijnik A, Nijnik M, Soloviy I (2009a) Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development in the Ukrainian Carpathians. MRI Newsl 2: 21-24
23. Nijnik M, Soloviy I, Nijnik A, Deyneka A (2009b) Challengers and potential policy responses towards sustainable mountain development and nature conservation in the Ukrainian Carpathians. In: Chmielewski T (ed) Nature conservation management: from idea to practical result. AlterNet, Lublin, p 132-149
24. Nijnik M, Nijnik A, Lundin L, Staszewski T, Postolache C (2010) Stakeholder attitudes to multi-functional forests in Europe. For Trees Livelihoods 19: 341-358
25. Nijnik M, Miller D, Nijnik A (2013) Linking multi-functional forestry goals with sustainable development objectives: a multi-national study. J Settl Spat Plann 2: 185-190
26. Nijnik M, Nijnik A, Bergsma E, Matthews R (2014) Heterogeneity of experts' opinion regarding opportunities and challenges of tackling deforestation in the tropics. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Change 19: 621-640
27. Nijnik M, Nijnik A, Brown I (2016) Exploring the linkages between multi-functional forestry goals and the legacy of spruce plantations in Scotland. Can J For Res 46: 1247-1254
28. Prell C, Hubacek K, ReedM(2009) Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 22: 501-518
29. Sarkki S, Karjalainen TP (2012) Science and issue advocacy in a forestry debate in northern Finland. Polar J 2: 125-138
30. Sarkki S, Ficko A, Grunewald K, Nijnik M (2016) Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance. Reg Environ Change 16: 2019-2032
31. Schmolck P (2012) PQMethod version 2.33. Available at http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/
32. Soloviy IP (2010) Policy for forest sector sustainable development: paradigm and instruments. Ukrainian National Forestry University Press, Lviv
33. Soloviy I, Nijnik M, Ilkiv K (2012) Mountain forestry policy and strategies in response to climate change challenges. J Ecol Econ 111-120
34. Stephenson W (1963) Independency and operationizm in Qsorting. Psychol Rec 13: 269-272
35. Stevenson H (2015) Contemporary discourses of green political economy: a Q method analysis. J Env Policy Plan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1523908 X.2015.1118681
36. The Carpathian Convention (2003) www.carpathianconvention. org/documents-carpathian-convention.html (accessed on 7 December 2015), UNEP, Vienna
37. The Forest Code of Ukraine (2006) http://zakon. rada. gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/anot.cgi?nreg=3852-12 Verkhovna Rada, Kyiv (accessed on 7 December 2015)
38. van Asselt MBA, Mellors J, Rijkens-Klomp N, Greeuw SCH, Molendijk KGP, Beers PJ, van Notten P (2001) Building blocks for participation in integrated assessment: a review of participatory methods. International Centre for Integrated Studies, Maastricht
39. van Exel J, De Graaf G (2005) Q methodology: a sneak preview. Erasmus University, Rotterdam
40. Vogel J, Lowham E (2007) Building consensus for constructive action: a study of perspectives on natural resource management. J For 105: 20-27
41. Watts S, Stenner P (2012) Doing Q methodological research: theory, method and interpretation. Sage, London
42. Zahvoyska L, Sarkki S, Zhyla T (2014) Perceptions of treeline ecosystem services and their governance: focus on Ukrainian Carpathians. In: Kruhlov I, Prots B (eds) Local responses to global challenges. Proc. Forum Carpaticum, Sept 16-19, 2014. Ukrainian Bestseller, Lviv, p 65-69
43. Zahvoyska L, Nijnik M, Sarkki S, Nijnik A, Pelyuch O (2015) Insights into treeline ecosystem services of the Ukrainian Carpathians from a stakeholder's perspective: an analysis of challenges for adaptive governance. J Proc For Acad Sci Ukr: Coll Sci Pap 13: 193-200