Heterogeneity of experts' opinion regarding opportunities and challenges of tackling deforestation in the tropics: A Q methodology application

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 621-640

  Nijnik, Maria ^a   Nijnik, Albert ^b   Bergsma, Emmy ^c   Matthews, Robin ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b Environmental Network Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attitudinal analysis; Avoided deforestation; Climate policy; Co benefits; Local communities

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH; ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; DECISION MAKING; DEFORESTATION; DEVELOPING WORLD; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EXPERT SYSTEM; GREENHOUSE GAS; HETEROGENEITY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; TROPICAL REGION;

EID: 84904265541     PISSN: 13812386     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-013-9529-0     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Angelsen A (ed.) (2008) Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor. Available via CIFOR. http://www. cifor. org/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/2601. html. Cited 11 Jun 2013.
2. Angelsen A, Brockhaus M, Sunderlin WD et al. (2012) Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. Centre for international forestry research, Bogor. Available via CIFOR. http://www. cifor. org/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/3805. html. Cited 11 Jun 2013.
3. Bernard F, Minang PA, van Noordwijk M (2013) Review of current tools and methods for REDD and REALU value chains. ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins. Available via ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins. http://www. asb. cgiar. org/PDFwebdocs/Review%20of%20current%20tools%20and%20methods%20for%20REDD±%20and%20REALU%20value%20chains. pdf. Cited 16 Jun 2013.
4. Boer R, Sulistyowati L, Zed F et al. (2009) Summary for policy makers: Indonesia second national communication under the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Ministry of forestry of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta. Available via Forest Climate Center. http://forestclimatecenter. org/files/2009-11-14%20SNC%20-%20Indonesia%20Second%20National%20Communication%20under%20The%20UNFCCC%20%28Summary%20for%20Policy%20Makers%29. pdf. Cited 6 Jun 2011.
5. Brown S (1996) Q methodology and qualitative research. J Qual Health Res 6: 561-567.
6. Brown SR (1999) A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity 16(3/4): 91-138.
7. Brown SR, Durning D, Selden S (1999) Q Methodology. In: Miller GJ, Whicker ML (eds) Handbook of research methods in public administration. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 599-637.
8. Brown K, Adger WN, Boyd E et al. (2004) How do CDM projects contribute to sustainable development? Technical Report No.16. Tyndall Centre, Norwich. Available via Tyndall Centre. http://www. tyndall. ac. uk/sites/default/files/Brown,%20K.,%20Boyd,%20E.,%20Corbera,%20E.,%20Adger,%20N.%20%282004%29%20How%20do%20CDM%20projects%20contribute%20to%20sustainable%20development%20%28tr16%29. pdf. Cited 15 Jun 2013.
9. Cerbu G, Minang P, Swallow B et al. (2009) Global survey of REDD projects: What implications for global climate objectives? ASB policy brief No 12. ASB partnership for the tropical forest margins, Nairobi. Available via ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins. http://www. asb. cgiar. org/pdfwebdocs/ASBPB12. pdf. Cited 14 Jun 2013.
10. Chomitz K (2002) Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: how do forestry and energy projects compare? Clim Pol 2: 35-49.
11. Cuppen E (2009) Putting perspectives into participation-constructive conflict methodology for problem structuring in stakeholder dialogues. Uitgeverij BOXPress, Oisterwijk.
12. Davies B, Sherlock K, Rauschmayer F (2005) 'Recruitment', 'composition' and 'mandate' issues in deliberative processes: should we focus on arguments rather than individuals? Environmental Planning C 23: 599-615.
13. Dixon RK, Winjun JK, Adrasko KJ et al (1994) Integrated land-use systems: assessment of promising agroforest and alternative land-use practices to enhance carbon conservation and sequestration. Climate Change 30: 1-23.
14. Dyer G, Nijnik M (2013) Implications of carbon forestry programmes on local livelihoods and leakage. Ann For Sci. doi: 10. 1007/s13595-013-0293-9.
15. FAO (2005a) A world imperilled: Forces behind forest loss. Available via Mongobay. http://rainforests. mongabay. com/0801. htm. Cited 11 Jul 2012.
16. FAO (2005b) State of the world's forests. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available via Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www. fao. org/docrep/007/y5574e/y5574e00. htm. Cited 14 Jun 2013.
17. FAO (2005c) Global forest resources assessment 2005: 15 key findings. Available via Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www. fao. org/forestry. Cited 3 Jul 2012.
18. Freer-Smith PH, Broadmeadow MSJ, Lynch JM (eds) (2007) Forestry and climate change. CABI, Wallingford.
19. Gentry BS (2000) Private capital flows and climate change: Maximizing private investment in developing countries under the kyoto protocol. In: Gomez EL (ed) Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, pp. 187-200.
20. IIED (2011) REDD: Protecting climate, forests and livelihoods. Available via IIED. http://www. iied. org/redd-protecting-climate-forests-livelihoods. Cited 12 Jun 2012.
21. IPCC (2000) Summary for policy-makers. Available via IPCC. http://www. ipcc. ch/pdf/special-reports spm/sres-en. pdf. Cited 12 Jun 2012.
22. Karumbidza B, Menne W (2009) Potential impacts of tree plantation projects under the CDM - An African case study. Available via Global Justice Ecology Project. http://globaljusticeecology. org/stopgetrees_news. php?ID=527. Cited 16 Jun 2012.
23. Keohane R, Ostrom E (eds) (1995) Local commons and global interdependence: Heterogeneity and cooperation in two domains. Sage, London.
24. Lasswell H (1971) A pre-view of the policy sciences. American Elsevier, New York.
25. McKeown B, Thomas D (1988) Q-methodology, Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage, Beverly Hills.
26. MEA (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment synthesis report. Available via Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. http://www. unep. org/maweb/en/index. aspx. Cited 16 Jun 2013.
27. Miles L, Kapos V (2008) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: Global land-use implications. Science 320(5882): 1454-1455.
28. Nijnik M (2010) Carbon capture and storage in forests. Iss Environment Sci Tech 29: 203-238.
29. Nijnik M, Halder P (2013) Afforestation and reforestation projects in South and South-East Asia under the CDM: Trends and development opportunities. Land Use Policy 31: 504-515.
30. Nijnik M, Zahvoyska L, Nijnik A, Ode A (2008) Public evaluation of landscape content and change. Land Use Policy 26: 77-86.
31. Nijnik M, Slee B, Pajot G (2010) Opportunities and challenges for terrestrial carbon offsetting and marketing, with some implications for forestry in the UK. South East Europ J Forestry 1(2): 69-79.
32. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press, New York.
33. Parker C, Mitchell A, Trivedi M, Mardas N (2009) The little REDD+ book. Global Canopy Programme, Oxford.
34. Peskett L, Brown D, Luttrell C (2006) Can payments for avoided deforestation to tackle climate change also benefit the poor? Forestry Briefing 12. Overseas Development Institute, London. Available via Overseas Development Institute. http://www. odi. org. uk/sites/odi. org. uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/28. pdf. Cited 16 Jun 2013.
35. Pistorius T, Schmitt CB, Benick D (2010) Greening REDD+: Challenges and opportunities for forest biodiversity conservation. University of Freiburg, Freiburg. Available via University of Freiburg. http://www. ifp. uni-freiburg. de/greening%20redd. Cited 15 Jun 2013.
36. Rayner J, Buck A, Katila P (eds) (2010) Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance, IUFRO World Series 28. International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Vienna. Available via the International Union of Forest Research Organizations. www. iufro. org/download/file/6580/4539/ws28_pdf. Cited 15 Jun 2013.
37. Stephenson W (1963) Independency and operationism in Q-sorting. Psychol Rec 13: 269-272.
38. UN (2005) United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Carbon Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries. Available via UN-REDD. http://un-redd. com. Cited 22 Jun 2012.
39. UNEP (2010) Status and barriers of CDM projects in Southeast Asian Countries. Available via UNEP. http://www. unep. org/climatechange/Portals/5/documents/RoapFocalPoints/FinalCDMAnalysisReport. pdf. Cited 15 Jun 2013.
40. UNFCCC (1997) The Kyoto protocol to the convention on climate change. UNEP/IUC, Bonn.
41. UNFCCC (2001) Report of the conference of the parties (COP 7) on its seventh session, held at Marrakech from 29 October to 10 November 2001. Available via UNFCCC. http://unfccc. int/resource/docs/cop7/13a01. pdf. Cited 13 Jun 2013.
42. UNFCCC (2005) Report of the conference of the parties (COP 11) on its eleventh session, held at Montreal from 28 November to 9 December 2005. Available via UNFCCC. http://unfccc. int/resource/docs/2005/cop11/eng/05a01. pdf. Cited 13 Jun 2013.
43. UNFCCC (2007) Report of the conference of the parties (COP 13) on its eleventh session, held in Bali from 3 November to 15 December 2007. Available via UNFCCC. http://unfccc. int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06. pdf. Cited 13 Jun 2013.
44. UNFCCC (2009) Report of the conference of the parties (COP 15) on its fifteen session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 9 December 2009. Available via UNFCCC. http://unfccc. int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01. pdf. Cited 13 Jun 2013.
45. UNFCCC (2010) Report of the Conference of the Parties (COP 16) on its sixteen fifteen session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Available via UNFCCC. http://unfccc. int/meetings/cancun_nov_2010/meeting/6266/php/view/reports. php. Cited 13 Jun 2013.
46. van Asselt M, Mellors J, Rijkens-Klomp N et al (2001) Building blocks for participation in integrated assessment: A review of participatory methods. International Centre for Integrated Studies, Maastricht.
47. 2 emissions from forest loss. Nat Geosci 2: 737-738.
48. van Kooten GC (2004) Climate change economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
49. van Kooten GC (2012) Climate change, climate science and economics: Prospects for a renewable energy future. Springer, Dordrecht.
50. Vatn A, Angelsen A (2009) Options for a national REDD+ architecture. In: Angelsen A (ed) Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options. CIFOR, Bogor, pp 57-74.
51. Wolf S, Zilberman D (eds) (2001) Knowledge generation and technical change: institutional innovation in agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts.