Reproducible and Replicable Computational Fluid Dynamics: It's Harder Than You Think

Computing in Science and Engineering

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 44-55

  Mesnard, Olivier ^a   Barba, Lorena A ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CFD; computational fluid dynamics; reproducible research; scientific computing

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS; FLUID DYNAMICS; NATURAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

BLUFF BODY AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS CODES; REPLICATION STUDY; REPRODUCIBLE RESEARCH;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 85028848136     PISSN: 15219615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MCSE.2017.3151254     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. L.A. Barba, "Reproducibility PI Manifesto," Figshare, 2012; https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.104539.v1.
2. A. Krishnan et al., "Lift and Wakes of Flying Snakes," Physics of Fluids, vol. 26, 2014, article no. 031901.
3. D. Holden et al., "Aerodynamics of the Flying Snake Chrysopelea Paradisi: How a Bluff Body Cross-Sectional Shape Contributes to Gliding Performance," J. Experimental Biology, vol. 217, 2014, pp. 382-394.
4. A. Krishnan et al., "Lift and Drag Coefficient versus Angle of Attack for a Flying Snake Cross- Section," Figshare, 2013; https://doi.org/10.6084 /m9.figshare.705883.v2.
5. C.H.K. Williamson, "Vortex Dynamics in the Cylinder Wake," Ann. Rev. Fluid Mechanics, vol. 28, 1996, pp. 477-539.
6. R.L. Sani and P.M. Gresho, "Résumé and Remarks on the Open Boundary Condition Minisymposium," Int'l J. Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 18, 1994, pp. 983-1008.
7. K. Taira and T. Colonius, "The Immersed Boundary Method: A Projection Approach," J. Computational Physics, vol. 225, 2007, pp. 2118-2137.
8. A.P.S. Bhalla et al., "A Unified Mathematical Framework and an Adaptive Numerical Method for Fluid Structure Interaction with Rigid Deforming, and Elastic Bodies," J. Computational Physics, vol. 250, 2013, pp. 446-476.
9. M. Schwab, N. Karrenbach, and J. Claerbout, "Making Scientific Computations Reproducible," Computing in Science & Eng., vol. 2, 2000, pp. 61-67.
10. R.D. Peng, "Reproducible Research in Computational Science," Science, vol. 334, 2011, pp. 1226-1227.
11. G. Dimonte et al., "A Comparative Study of the Turbulent Rayleigh-Taylor Instability Using High- Resolution Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulations: The Alpha-Group Collaboration," Physics of Fluids, vol. 16, 2004, p. 1668.
12. D.W. Laflin et al., "Summary of Data from the Fifth Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop," J. Aircraft, vol. 51, 2014, pp. 1194-1213.
13. C.L. Rumsey and J.P. Slotnick, "Overview and Summary of the Second AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop," J. Aircraft, vol. 52, 2015, pp. 1006-1025.
14. J.P.A. Ioannidis, "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False," PLoS Medicine, vol. 2, 2005, article no. e124.
15. J.J. Quirk, "A Contribution to the Great Riemann Solver Debate," Upwind and High-Resolution Schemes, Springer Science Business Media, 1997, pp. 550-569.
16. N. Metropolis and E.C. Nelson, "Early Computing at Los Alamos," IEEE Annals History of Computing, vol. 4, 1982, pp. 348-357.