Developing an objectives hierarchy for multicriteria decisions on land use options, with a case study of biodiversity conservation and forestry production from Papua, Indonesia

Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 464-485

  Sarkar, Sahotra ^a   Dyer, James S ^a   Margules, Chris ^b,c,d   Kemp, Neville ^f   Wong, Grace ^g,h   Supriatna, Jatna ^d,i  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Conservation International Asia Pacific Division ^*  (Australia)

^c JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA   (Indonesia)

^e Navis LLC   (United States)

^f PT Ekologika Consultants   (Indonesia)

^g Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science and Oceans   (United States)

^h CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

ⁱ NONE   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Conservation area networks; Decision analysis; Fundamental objectives; Indonesia; Land use planning; Multicriteria analysis; Objectives hierarchy; Papua; Tabu search; Trade offs

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; LAND USE PLANNING; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

INDONESIA; MERAUKE; PAPUA [(PRV) INDONESIA];

EID: 85028624072     PISSN: 23998083     EISSN: 23998091     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0265813516641684     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Butler J, Chebeskov A, Dyer J, et al. (2007) The adoption of multiattribute utility theory for the evaluation of plutonium disposition options in the United States and Russia. In: Edwards W, Miles RF Jr and von Winterfeldt D (eds) Advances in Decision Theory: From Foundations to Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 489-513.
2. Butler J, Dyer J and Jia J (2006) Fundamental objectives and proxy attributes in preference models. Decision Analysis 103: 531-546.
3. Chang S-Y, Downey Brill E Jr and Hopkins LD (1982) Efficient random generation of planning alternatives: A land use example. Journal of Regional Science 22: 303-314.
4. Ciarleglio M, Barnes JW and Sarkar S (2009a) ConsNet: New software for the selection of conservation area networks with spatial and multi-criteria analyses. Ecography 32: 205-209.
5. Ciarleglio M, Barnes JW and Sarkar S (2010) ConsNet-A tabu search approach to the spatially coherent conservation area network design problem. Journal of Heuristics 16: 537-557.
6. Ciarleglio M, Wang O and Sarkar S (2009b) Area prioritization for Medco concession in Merauke: Report to Conservation International-Technical Note 63 Report. Austin, TX: Biodiversity and Biocultural Conservation Laboratory, University of Texas.
7. Conservation International (2010) Optimizing conservation and production-A collaboration between conservation and business. Report. Jakarta: Conservation International-Indonesia.
8. Dyer J (2005) MAUT-multi-attribute utility theory. In: Figuera J, Greco S and Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Berlin: Springer, pp. 266-294.
9. Faith D (1995) Biodiversity and Regional Sustainability Analysis. Lyneham, ACT: CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology.
10. Figuera J, Greco S and Ehrgott M (eds) (2005) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Berlin: Springer.
11. Gregory R and Keeney M (1998) Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Management Science 40: 1035-1048. Reprinted in. In: Dyson RG and O’Brien FA (eds) Strategic Development. Chichester: Wiley, 1998, pp. 19-38.
12. Hopkins LD (1977) Methods for generating land suitability maps: A comparative evaluation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 43: 386-400.
13. Keefer D, Kirkwood C and Corner J (2007) In: Edwards W, Miles RF Jr and von Winterfeldt D (eds), Advances in Decision Theory: From Foundations to Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 582-610.
14. Keeney RL (1992) Value-Focused Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Keeney RL (2002) Common mistakes in making value tradeoffs. Operations Research 50: 935-945.
16. Keeney RL (2006) Eliciting knowledge about values for public policy decisions. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 5(4): 739-749.
17. Keeney RL, McDaniels T and Swoveland C (1995) Evaluating improvements in electric utility reliability at British Columbia Hydro. Operations Research 43: 933-947.
18. Keeney RL and von Winterfeldt D (2007) In: Edwards W, Miles RF Jr and von Winterfeldt D (eds), Advances in Decision Theory: From Foundations to Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 232-252.
19. Lai S-K and Hopkins LD (1989) The meanings of tradeoffs in multi-attribute evaluation methods: A comparison. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 16: 155-170.
20. McDaniels T, Longstaff H and Dowlatabadi H (2006) A value-based framework for risk management decisions involving multiple scales: A salmon aquaculture example. Environmental Science and Policy 9: 423-438.
21. Machado EA, Stoms DM, Davis FW, et al. (2006) Prioritizing farmland preservation cost-effectively for multiple objectives. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 61: 250-258.
22. Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20: 703-726.
23. Margules CR and Sarkar S (2007) Systematic Conservation Planning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Moffett A, Dyer JS and Sarkar S (2006) Integrating biodiversity representation with multiple criteria in North-Central Namibia using non-dominated alternatives and a modified Analytic Hierarchy Process. Biological Conservation 129: 181-191.
25. Moffett A and Sarkar S (2006) Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: A minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12: 125-137.
26. Owen D (2015) Collaborative decision making. Decision Analysis 12(1): 23-45.
27. Regan HM, Davis FW, Andelman S, et al. (2007) Comprehensive criteria for biodiversity evaluation in conservation planning. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 2715-2728.
28. Sarkar S (2005) Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy: An Introduction to the Issues. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Sarkar S and Garson J (2004) Multiple criterion synchronization for conservation area network design: The use of non-dominated alternative sets. Conservation and Society 2: 433-448.
30. Sarkar S and Illoldi-Rangel P (2010) Systematic conservation planning: An updated protocol. Natureza and Conservaç ão 9: 19-26.
31. Sarkar S, Pressey RL, Faith P, et al. (2006) Biodiversity conservation planning tools: Present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 123-159.
32. Sheil D, Puri RJ, Basuki I, et al. (2002) Exploring Biological Diversity, Environment and Local People’s Perspectives in Forest Landscapes: Methods for a Multidisciplinary Landscape Assessment. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.