Fostering the professional development of junior authors and reviewers in scientific journals / Contribuyendo al desarrollo profesional de autores y revisores noveles en revistas científicas

Infancia y Aprendizaje

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 383-406

  Bautista, Alfredo ^a   Castelló, Montserrat ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITAT RAMON LLULL   (Spain)

Author keywords

experienced reviewers; junior authors; junior reviewers; peer review; professional development

Indexed keywords

EID: 85028574296     PISSN: 02103702     EISSN: 15784126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02103702.2017.1357250     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bautista, A., & Castelló, M., (2015). Call for papers:Fostering the professional development of junior authors and reviewers in scientific journals. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 38, 681–688.
2. Bautista, A., Monereo, C., & Scheuer, N., (2014). The peer review process as an opportunity for learning /La evaluación por pares como oportunidad para el aprendizaje. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37, 665–686. doi:10.1080/02103702.2014.977105
3. Benos, D. J., Bashari, E., Chaves, J. M., Gaggar, A., Kapoor, N., LaFrance, M., … Zotov, A., (2007). The ups and downs of peer review. Advances in Physiology Education, 31, 145–152. doi:10.1152/advan.00104.2006
4. Benos, D. J., Kirk, K. L., & Hall, J. E., (2003). How to review a paper. Advances in Physiology Education, 27, 47–52. doi:10.1152/advan.00057.2002
5. Brown, T., (2006). Peer review and the acceptance of new scientific ideas. London:Sense About Science.
6. Callaham, M. L., & Tercier, J., (2007). The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality. PLOS Medicine:A Peer-Reviewed Open-Access Journal, 4(1), e40. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040040
7. Castello, M., Iñesta, A., & Corcelles, M., (2013). Learning to write a research article:PhD students’ transitions toward disciplinary writing regulation. Research in the Teaching of English, 47, 442–478.
8. Castelló, M., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Bautista, A., (this issue). No solo de publicar viven los autores:Aprendiendo a revisar artículos científicos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 40. doi:10.1080/02103702.2017.1357251
9. Craig Rush, S., & Wheeler, J., (2011). Enhancing junior faculty research productivity through multiinstitution collaboration:Participants’ impressions of the school psychology research collaboration conference. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26, 220–240. doi:10.1177/0829573511413552
10. del Río, P., Sánchez, E., & García, J. N., (2002). 25 años:Una propuesta desde el balance de una infancia y un aprendizaje. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 25, 387–390. doi:10.1174/021037002762064000
11. DuFour, R., (2004). What is a “Professional Learning Community”? Educational Leadership, 61, 6–11.
12. Elbow, P., (2000). Everyone can write. Essays toward a hopeful theory of writing and teaching writing. New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
13. García, J.-N., Sánchez, E., del Río, P., & Arias-Gundín, O., (2002). Content analysis of the 25 years of Infancia y Aprendizaje:Development and educational research history. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 25, 403–440. doi:10.1174/021037002762064028
14. Ingelfinger, F. J., (1974). Peer review in biomedical publication. The American Journal of Medicine, 56, 686–692. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(74)90635-4
15. Luey, B., (2010). Handbook for academic authors (5th ed.). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
16. Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C. M., (2007). Voice in academic writing:The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 235–249. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
17. Pedrazzini, A., Bautista, B., Scheuer, N., & Monereo, C., (2014). Review by (non)peers as an opportunity for learning:A case study on the editorial process of papers by junior researchers /La revisión por (im)pares como instancia de aprendizaje:Un estudio de casos del proceso editorial de artículos de investigadoras noveles. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37, 851–901. doi:10.1080/02103702.2014.977531
18. Provenzale, J. M., & Stanley, R. J., (2006). A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 34, 92–99.
19. Sánchez, E., García, J. N., & del Río, P., (2002). Writing as rewriting:A content analysis of peer reviews of non-accepted papers submitted to Infancia y Aprendizaje. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 25, 5–35. doi:10.1174/021037002753508502
20. Scheuer, N., Bautista, A., Martín, E., & Pozo, J. I., (2009). “Tras una lectura atenta de su manuscrito…” Un análisis de los procesos de revisión en Infancia y Aprendizaje. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 32, 243–264. doi:10.1174/021037009788964213
21. Taylor & Francis Group. (2016). Peer review:A global view. Motivations, training and support in peer review. Abingdon:Taylor & Francis.
22. Weller, A. C., (1996). A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of U. S. medical journals. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 84, 359–366.