Open Peer Review in the Era of Open Science: A Pilot Study of Researchers' Perceptions

Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages

  Rath, Manasa ^a   Wang, Peiling ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Open Peer Review; Open Science; OPR; Scientific publishing.

Indexed keywords

REVIEWS;

DEVELOPMENT STAGES; DIGITAL LIBRARY COLLECTIONS; OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS; OPEN SCIENCE; PEER REVIEW; PILOT STUDIES; QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 85028001016     PISSN: 15525996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/JCDL.2017.7991608     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Bartholomew, R. E. (2014). Science for sale: The rise of predatory journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 107(10), 384-5.
2. Bohannon, J. (2013). Who's Afraid of Peer Review Science 342, 60-65 (2013)
3. Laakso, M., & Björk, B-C. (2012) Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10:124 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-124.
4. McCook, A. (2006). Is peer review broken What's wrong with peer review The Scientist, 20(2), 26-35.
5. Rennie, D. (2016). Make peer review scientific. Nature, 535(July 7), 31-33.
6. Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178-182.
7. van Rooyen, S., Delamothe, T., & Evans, S. J. (2010). Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomized controlled trial. BMJ, 341, c5729.
8. Wang, P. (2015). Collaborative interaction behavior in the era of open science movement. In Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Evaluation on Collaborative Information Retrieval and Seeking (pp. 7-10). ACM.
9. Wang, P., Rath, M., Deike, M., & Qiang, W. (2016). Open Peer Review: An Innovation in Scientific Publishing. iConference.
10. Wang, P.,You, S., Rath, M., & Wolfram, D. (2016). Open Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: A Web Mining Study of PeerJ Authors and Reviewers. Journal of Data and Information Science. DOI:10.20309/jdis.201625.