This paper is the winner of an SFB Award in the Hospital Intern, Residency category: Peptide biomaterials raising adaptive immune responses in wound healing contexts

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 104, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 1853-1862

  Vigneswaran, Yalini ^a   Han, Huifang ^a   De Loera, Roberto ^a   Wen, Yi ^a,b   Zhang, Xing ^a   Sun, Tao ^a   Mora Solano, Carolina ^a   Collier, Joel H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

immunogenic materials; peptide nanofibers; scaffold; T cell phenotype; wound

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODIES; BIOMATERIALS; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; IMMUNE SYSTEM; NANOFIBERS; PEPTIDES; SCAFFOLDS; T-CELLS; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; MAMMALS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

ADAPTIVE IMMUNE RESPONSE; ANTIBODY PRODUCTION; CELL PHENOTYPE; CELL POPULATIONS; PEPTIDE SELF ASSEMBLIES; SELF-ASSEMBLED PEPTIDES; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS; WOUND;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); T-CELLS;

BIOMATERIAL; IMMUNOLOGICAL ADJUVANT; NANOFIBER; PEPTIDE VACCINE;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; ADJUVANT THERAPY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANTIBODY PRODUCTION; ANTIBODY RESPONSE; ANTIBODY TITER; ARTICLE; B LYMPHOCYTE; CD3+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; IMMUNIZATION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MACROPHAGE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; T LYMPHOCYTE; WOUND; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 85027956001     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35767     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Gawronska-Kozak B, Bogacki M, Rim JS, Monroe WT, Manuel JA. Scarless skin repair in immunodeficient mice. Wound Repair Regen 2006;14:265–276.
2. Boyce DE, Ciampolini J, Ruge F, Murison MS, Harding KG. Inflammatory-cell subpopulations in keloid scars. Br J Plast Surg 2001;54:511–516.
3. Adolph VR, DiSanto SK, Bleacher JC, Dillon PW, Krummel TM. The potential role of the lymphocyte in fetal wound healing. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:1316–1320.
4. Barbul A, Regan MC. The regulatory role of T lymphocytes in wound healing. J Trauma 1990;30:S97–S100.
5. Park JE, Barbul A. Understanding the role of immune regulation in wound healing. Am J Surg 2004;187:11S–16S.
6. Martin CW, Muir IF. The role of lymphocytes in wound healing. Br J Plast Surg 1990;43:655–662.
7. Efron JE, Frankel HL, Lazarou SA, Wasserkrug HL, Barbul A. Wound healing and T-lymphocytes. J Surg Res 1990;48:460–463.
8. Peterson JM, Barbul A, Breslin RJ, Wasserkrug HL, Efron G. Significance of T-lymphocytes in wound healing. Surgery 1987;102:300–305.
9. Eming SA, Hammerschmidt M, Krieg T, Roers A. Interrelation of immunity and tissue repair or regeneration. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009;20:517–527.
10. Eming SA, Krieg T, Davidson JM. Inflammation in wound repair: Molecular and cellular mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol 2007;127:514–525.
11. Iwata Y, Yoshizaki A, Komura K, Shimizu K, Ogawa F, Hara T, et al. CD19, a response regulator of B lymphocytes, regulates wound healing through hyaluronan-induced TLR4 signaling. Am J Pathol 2009;175:649–660.
12. Nishio N, Ito S, Suzuki H, Isobe K. Antibodies to wounded tissue enhance cutaneous wound healing. Immunology 2009;128:369–380.
13. Chen J, Pompano RR, Santiago FW, Maillat L, Sciammas R, Sun T, et al. The use of self-adjuvanting nanofiber vaccines to elicit high-affinity B cell responses to peptide antigens without inflammation. Biomaterials 2013;34:8776–8785.
14. Rudra JS, Sun T, Bird KC, Daniels MD, Gasiorowski JZ, Chong AS, et al. Modulating adaptive immune responses to peptide self-assemblies. ACS Nano 2012;6:1557–1564.
15. Rudra JS, Tian YF, Jung JP, Collier JH. A self-assembling peptide acting as an immune adjuvant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:622–627.
16. Fishel RS, Barbul A, Beschorner WE, Wasserkrug HL, Efron G. Lymphocyte participation in wound healing. Morphologic assessment using monoclonal antibodies. Ann Surg 1987;206:25–29.
17. Barbul A, Breslin RJ, Woodyard JP, Wasserkrug HL, Efron G. The effect of in vivo T helper and T suppressor lymphocyte depletion on wound healing. Ann Surg 1989;209:479–483.
18. Davis PA, Corless DJ, Aspinall R, Wastell C. Effect of CD4(+) and CD8(+) cell depletion on wound healing. Br J Surg 2001;88:298–304.
19. Ansaloni L, Cambrini P, Catena F, Di Saverio S, Gagliardi S, Gazzotti F, et al. Immune response to small intestinal submucosa (surgisis) implant in humans: Preliminary observations. J Invest Surg 2007;20:237–241.
20. Allman AJ, McPherson TB, Badylak SF, Merrill LC, Kallakury B, Sheehan C, et al. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix grafts elicit a TH2-restricted immune response. Transplantation 2001;71:1631–1640.
21. Hudalla GA, Sun T, Gasiorowski JZ, Han H, Tian YF, Chong AS, et al. Gradated assembly of multiple proteins into supramolecular nanomaterials. Nat Mater 2014;13:829–836.
22. Trent A, Ulery BD, Black MJ, Barrett JC, Liang S, Kostenko Y, et al. Peptide amphiphile micelles self-adjuvant group A streptococcal vaccination. AAPS J 2015;17:380–388.
23. Black M, Trent A, Kostenko Y, Lee JS, Olive C, Tirrell M. Self-assembled peptide amphiphile micelles containing a cytotoxic T-cell epitope promote a protective immune response in vivo. Adv Mater 2012;24:3845–3849.
24. Jung JP, Nagaraj AK, Fox EK, Rudra JS, Devgun JM, Collier JH. Co-assembling peptides as defined matrices for endothelial cells. Biomaterials 2009;30:2400–2410.
25. Jung JP, Moyano JV, Collier JH. Multifactorial optimization of endothelial cell growth using modular synthetic extracellular matrices. Integr Biol (Camb) 2011;3:185–196.
26. Pompano RR, Chen J, Verbus EA, Han H, Fridman A, McNeely T, Collier JH, Chong AS. Titrating T-cell epitopes within self-assembled vaccines optimizes CD4+ helper T cell and antibody outputs. Adv Healthc Mater 2014;3:1898–1908.
27. Rudra JS, Mishra S, Chong AS, Mitchell RA, Nardin EH, Nussenzweig V, Collier JH. Self-assembled peptide nanofibers raising durable antibody responses against a malaria epitope. Biomaterials 2012;33:6476–6484.
28. Kisiday J, Jin M, Kurz B, Hung H, Semino C, Zhang S, Grodzinsky AJ. Self-assembling peptide hydrogel fosters chondrocyte extracellular matrix production and cell division: Implications for cartilage tissue repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:9996–10001.
29. Silva GA, Czeisler C, Niece KL, Beniash E, Harrington DA, Kessler JA, Stupp SI. Selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells by high-epitope density nanofibers. Science 2004;303:1352–1355.
30. Matson JB, Stupp SI. Self-assembling peptide scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Chem Commun (Camb) 2012;48:26–33.
31. Dvir T, Timko BP, Kohane DS, Langer R. Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues. Nat Nanotechnol 2011;6:13–22.
32. Tian YF, Hudalla GA, Han H, Collier JH. Controllably degradable β-sheet nanofibers and gels from self-assembling depsipeptides. Biomater Sci 2013;1.
33. Tian YF, Devgun JM, Collier JH. Fibrillized peptide microgels for cell encapsulation and 3D cell culture. Soft Matter 2011;7:6005–6011.
34. Jung JP, Jones JL, Cronier SA, Collier JH. Modulating the mechanical properties of self-assembled peptide hydrogels via native chemical ligation. Biomaterials 2008;29:2143–2151.
35. Ring BD, Scully S, Davis CR, Baker MB, Cullen MJ, Pelleymounter MA, Danilenko DM. Systemically and topically administered leptin both accelerate wound healing in diabetic ob/ob mice. Endocrinology 2000;141:446–449.
36. Tsuboi R, Shi CM, Rifkin DB, Ogawa H. A wound healing model using healing-impaired diabetic mice. J Dermatol 1992;19:673–675.
37. Greenhalgh DG, Sprugel KH, Murray MJ, Ross R. PDGF and FGF stimulate wound healing in the genetically diabetic mouse. Am J Pathol 1990;136:1235–1246.
38. Sullivan SR, Underwood RA, Gibran NS, Sigle RO, Usui ML, Carter WG, Olerud JE. Validation of a model for the study of multiple wounds in the diabetic mouse (db/db). Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:953–960.
39. Wang X, Ge J, Tredget EE, Wu Y. The mouse excisional wound splinting model, including applications for stem cell transplantation. Nat Protoc 2013;8:302–309.
40. Galiano RD, Michaels J, Dobryansky M, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2004;12:485–492.
41. Schierle CF, De la Garza M, Mustoe TA, Galiano RD. Staphylococcal biofilms impair wound healing by delaying reepithelialization in a murine cutaneous wound model. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17:354–359.
42. Wu Y, Chen L, Scott PG, Tredget EE. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance wound healing through differentiation and angiogenesis. Stem Cells 2007;25:2648–2659.
43. Aguilar JC, Rodríguez EG. Vaccine adjuvants revisited. Vaccine 2007;25:3752–3762.
44. Jung JP, Gasiorowski JZ, Collier JH. Fibrillar peptide gels in biotechnology and biomedicine. Biopolymers 2010;94:49–59.
45. Segers VF, Lee RT. Local delivery of proteins and the use of self-assembling peptides. Drug Discov Today 2007;12:561–568.
46. Semino CE. Self-assembling peptides: From bio-inspired materials to bone regeneration. J Dent Res 2008;87:606–616.
47. Kopecek J, Yang J. Peptide-directed self-assembly of hydrogels. Acta Biomater 2009;5:805–816.
48. Hamley IW. Peptide fibrillization. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2007;46:8128–8147.
49. Ulijn RV, Smith AM. Designing peptide based nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 2008;37:664–675.
50. Badylak SF, Gilbert TW. Immune response to biologic scaffold materials. Semin Immunol 2008;20:109–116.
51. Rodriguez A, Voskerician G, Meyerson H, MacEwan SR, Anderson JM. T cell subset distributions following primary and secondary implantation at subcutaneous biomaterial implant sites. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;85:556–565.
52. Strom TB, Roy-Chaudhury P, Manfro R, Zheng XX, Nickerson PW, Wood K, Bushell A. The Th1/Th2 paradigm and the allograft response. Curr Opin Immunol 1996;8:688–693.