Study and comparison of color models for automatic image analysis in irrigation management applications

Agricultural Water Management

Volumn 151, Issue , 2015, Pages 158-166

  Garcia Mateos G ^a   Hernandez Hernandez J L ^c   Escarabajal Henarejos, D ^b   Jaen Terrones S ^a   Molina Martinez J M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CARTAGENA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE GUERRERO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Automatic irrigation computation; Color classification; Color spaces; Image processing in agriculture

Indexed keywords

COLOR CODES; CROPS; GRAPHIC METHODS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IRRIGATION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SOILS;

AUTOMATIC IMAGE ANALYSIS; AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION; COLOR CLASSIFICATION; COLOR SPACE; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT; NONPARAMETRIC METHODS; WATER CONSUMPTION;

COLOR;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY; COLOR; HISTOGRAM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; LEAFY VEGETABLE; PIXEL;

LACTUCA; LACTUCA SATIVA; SIMPLEXVIRUS;

EID: 85027944671     PISSN: 03783774     EISSN: 18732283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements-FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 1998, 300:6541. FAO, Rome.
2. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S. Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Irrig. Sci. 2009, 28:17-34.
3. Åstrand B., Baerveldt A.J. An agricultural mobile robot with vision-based perception for mechanical weed control. Autonomous Robots 2002, 13:21-35.
4. Blasco J., Aleixos N., Roger J.M., Rabatel G., Molto E. Robotic weed control using machine vision. Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 83(2):149-157.
5. Campos I., Neale C.M., Calera A., Balbontín C., González-Piqueras J. Assessing satellite-based basal crop coefficients for irrigated grapes (Vitis vinifera L). Agric. Water Manage. 2010, 98:45-54.
6. Escarabajal-Henarejos D., Molina-Martínez J.M., Fernández-Pacheco D.G., García-Mateos G. Methodology for obtaining prediction models of root depth of lettuce for its application in irrigation automation. Agric. Water Manage. 2015, 151:167-173.
7. Fernández-Pacheco D.G., Escarabajal D., Ruiz-Canales A., Conesa J., Molina-Martínez J.M. A digital image-processing-based method for determining the crop coefficient of lettuce crops in the southeast of Spain. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 117:23-34.
8. Giacomelli G.A., Ling P.P., Kole J. Determining nutrient stress in lettuce plants with machine vision technology. HortTechnology 1998, 8(3):361-365.
9. Grant O.M., Davies M.J., Longbottom H., Harrison-Murray R. Evapotranspiration of container ornamental shrubs: modelling crop-specific factors for a diverse range of crops. Irrigation Science 2012, 30(1):1-12.
10. Hanson B.R., May D.M. Crop coefficients for drip-irrigated processing tomato. Agric. Water Manage. 2005, 81(3):381-399.
11. Kakumanu P., Makrogiannis S., Bourbakis N. A survey of skin-color modeling and detection methods. Pattern Recognit.V 40 2007, (3):1106-1122.
12. Kodagali J.A., Balaji S. Computer vision and image analysis based techniques for automatic characterization of fruits-a review. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2012, 50(6):6-12.
13. Kumar P., Sengupta K., Lee A. A comparative study of different color spaces for foreground and shadow detection for traffic monitoring system. The IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2002, 100-105.
14. Lin K., Chen J., Si H., Junhui W. A review on computer vision technologies applied in greenhouse plant stress detection. Adv. Image Graphics Technol. 2013, 363:192-200.
15. Ling P.P., Ruzhitsky V.N. Machine vision techniques for measuring the canopy of tomato seedling. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1996, 65:85-95.
16. López-Urrea R., Martín de Santa Olalla F., Montoro A., López-Fuster P. Single and dual crop coefficients and water requirements for onion (Allium cepa L.) under semiarid conditions. Agric. Water Manage. 2009, 96:1031-1036.
17. Luszczkiewicz-Piatek M. Which color space should be chosen for robust color image retrieval based on mixture modeling. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2014, 233:55-64.
18. McCarthy C.L., Cheryl N.H., Hancock S.R. Applied machine vision of plants-a review with implications for field deployment in automated farming operations. Intell. Serv. Rob. 2010, 3(4):209-217.
19. Meyer G.E., Mehta T., Kocher M.F., Mortensen D., Samal A.A. Textural imaging and discriminant analysis for distinguishing weeds for spot spraying. Trans. ASAE 1998, 41(4):1189-1197.
20. Ohta Y., Kanade T., Sakai T. Color information for region segmentation. Comput. Graphics Image Process. 1980, 13(3):222-241.
21. Shih P., Liu C. Comparative assessment of content-based face image retrieval in different color spaces. Int. J. Patt. Recogn. Artif. Intell. 2005, 19(7):873-893.
22. Shiraishi M., Sumiya H. Plant identification from leaves using quasi-sensor fusion. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., Trans. ASME 1996, 118(3):382-387.
23. Slaughter D.C., Giles D.K., Downey D. Autonomous robotic weed control systems: a review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2008, 61:63-78.
24. Steward B.L., Tian L.F., Nettleton D., Tang L. Reduced-dimension clustering for vegetation segmentation. Trans. ASAE 2004, 47(2):609-616.
25. Story D., Kacira M., Kubota C., Akoglu A., An L.L. Lettuce calcium deficiency detection with machine vision computed plant features in controlled environments. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 74(2):238-243.
26. Terrillon J.C., Akamatsu S. Comparative performance of different chrominance spaces for color segmentation and detection of human faces in complex scene images. International Conf. on Face and Gesture Recognition 2000, 54-61.
27. Xu X.G., Wang J.H., Li C.J., Song X.U., Huang W.J. Estimating growth height of winter wheat with remote sensing. In Proceedings of the SPIE 7824, Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XII 2010.
28. Woebbecke D.M., Meyer G.E., Von Bargen K., Mortensen D.A. Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions. Trans. ASAE 1995, 38(1):259-269.