The assessment of changes in cognitive functioning: Age-, education-, and gender-specific reliable change indices for older adults tested on the CERAD-NP battery: Results of the german study on ageing, cognition, and dementia in primary care patients (AgeCoDe)

American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 84-97

  Stein, Janine ^b   Luppa, Melanie ^b   Luck, Tobias ^b   Maier, Wolfgang ^c   Wagner, Michael ^c   Daerr, Moritz ^c   Van Den Bussche, Hendrik ^d   Zimmermann, Thomas ^d   Köhler, Mirjam ^d   Bickel, Horst ^e   Mösch, Edelgard ^e   Weyerer, Siegfried ^f   Kaufeler, Teresa ^f   Pentzek, Michael ^g   Wiese, Birgitt ^h   Wollny, Anja ⁱ   König, Hans Helmut ^b,d   Riedel Heller, Steffi G ^a  

^a Institute of Laboratory Medicine   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^e TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^f CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

^h HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

CERAD NP battery; change norms; cognitive change; dementia; Reliable Change Indices (RCI)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSORTIUM TO ESTABLISH A REGISTRY FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL BATTERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMENTIA; DISEASE REGISTRY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GENDER; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RELIABLE CHANGE INDEX; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; WORD LIST RECALL;

EID: 85027941875     PISSN: 10647481     EISSN: 15457214     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318209dd08     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000
2. Tombaugh TN: Test-retest reliable coefficients and 5-year change scores for the MMSE and 3MS. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2005; 20(4):485-503
3. Temkin NR, Heaton RK, Grant I, et al: Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: a comparison of four models. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1999; 5(4):357-369
4. Stein J, Luppa M, Br̈ahler E, et al: The assessment of changes in cognitive functioning: Reliable Change Indices for neuropsycho-logical instruments in the elderly-a systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2010; 29(3):275-286
5. Collie A, Maruff P, Makdissi M, et al: Statistical procedures for determining the extent of cognitive change following concussion. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38(3):273-278
6. Frerichs RJ, Tuokko HA: A comparison of methods for measuring cognitive change in older adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2005; 20(3):321-333
7. Maassen GH: Reliable change assessment in sport concussion research: a comment on the proposal and reviews of Collie et al. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39(8):483-488
8. Chelune GJ, Naugle RI, Lüders H, et al: Individual change after epilepsy surgery: practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology 1993; 7(1):41-52
9. Jacobson NS, Truax P: Clinical-significance-a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59(1):12-19
10. Hsu LM: Caveats concerning comparisons of change rates obtained with five methods of identifying significant client changes: comment on Speer and Greenbaum (1995). J Consult Clin Psychol 1999; 67(4):594-598
11. Morris JC, Mohs RC, Rogers H, et al: Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimers-disease (CERAD) clinical and neuropsy-chological assessment of Alzheimers-disease. Psychopharmacol Bull 1988; 24(4):641-652
12. Morris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC, et al: The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimers-disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimers-disease. Neurology 1989; 39(9):1159-1165
13. Seo EH, Lee DY, Lee JH, et al: Total scores of the CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery: validation for mild cognitive impairment and dementia patients with diverse etiologies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 18(9):801-809. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181cab764
14. Fillenbaum GG, van Belle G, Morris JC, et al: Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD): the first twenty years. Alzheimers Dement 2008; 4(2):96-109
15. Morris JC, Edland S, Clark C, et al: The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD). Part IV. Rates of cognitive change in the longitudinal assessment of probable Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1993; 43(12):2457-2465
16. Ganguli M, Seaberg EC, Ratcliff GG, et al: Cognitive stability over 2 years in a rural elderly population: the MoVIES project. Neu-roepidemiology 1996; 15(1):42-50
17. Ehreke L, Luppa M, Luck T, et al: Is the clock drawing test appropriate for screening for mild cognitive impairment? Results of the German study on ageing, cognition and dementia in primary care patients (AgeCoDe). Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2009; 28(4):365-372
18. Zaudig M, Mittelhammer J, Hiller W, et al: SIDAM-a structured interview for the diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer type, multi-infarct dementia and dementias of other aetiology according to ICD-10 and DSM-III-R. Psychol Med 1991; 21(1):225-236
19. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, et al: Mild cognitive impairment-beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med 2004; 256(3):240-246
20. Luck T, Zaudig M, Wiese B, et al: SIDAM: age-and education-specific reference values for the cognitive test section according to the new CASMIN educational classification (in German). Zeitschrift Für Gerontopsychologie Und Psychiatrie 2007; 20(1):31-38
21. Sheik JI, Yesavage JA: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Recent evidence and development of a shorter version, in Clinical Gerontology: A Guide to Assessment and Intervention. Edited by Brink TL. New York, the Haworth Press, 1986, pp 165-173
22. Cheng ST, Yu EC, Lee SY, et al: The geriatric depression scale as a screening tool for depression and suicide ideation: a replication and extention. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 18(3): 256-265
23. Brauns H, Steinmann S: Educational reform in France, West-Germany and the United Kingdom: updating the CASMIN educational classification. ZUMA Nachrichten 1999; 44:7-44
24. Zehnder AE, Blasi S, Berres M, et al: Lack of practice effects on neuropsychological tests as early cognitive markers of Alzheimer disease? Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2007; 22(5): 416-426
25. Collie A, Maruff P, Darby DG, et al: The effects of practice on the cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals assessed at brief test-retest intervals. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2003; 9(3):419-428
26. Blasi S, Zehnder AE, Berres M, et al: Norms for change in episodic memory as a prerequisite for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Neuropsychology 2009; 23(2):189-200
27. Hensel A, Angermeyer MC, Zaudig M, et al: Measuring cognitive change in older adults: reliable change indices for the SIDAM. J Neurol 2007; 254(1):91-98
28. Hensel A, Angermeyer MC, Riedel-Heller SG: Measuring cognitive change in older adults: reliable change indices for the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78(12):1298-1303
29. Salinsky MC, Storzbach D, Dodrill CB, et al: Test-retest bias, reliability, and regression equations for neuropsychological measures repeated over a 12-16-week period. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2001; 7(5):597-605
30. Beeri MS, Schmeidler J, Sano M, et al: Age, gender, and education norms on the CERAD neuropsychological battery in the oldest old. Neurology 2006; 67(6):1006-1010
31. Fillenbaum GG, Heyman A, Huber MS, et al: Performance of elderly African American and white community residents on the CERAD neuropsychological battery. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2001; 7(4):502-509
32. Ganguli M, Ratcliff G, Huff FJ, et al: Effects of age, gender, and education on cognitive tests in a rural elderly community sample-norms from the Monongahela valley independent elders survey. Neuroepidemiology 1991; 10(1):42-52
33. Welsh KA, Butters N, Mohs RC, et al: The consortium-to-establish-a- registry-for-Alzheimers-disease (CERAD). Part 5. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery. Neurology 1994; 44(4):609-614
34. Fillenbaum GG, McCurry SM, Kuchibhatla M, et al: Performance on the CERAD neuropsychology battery of two samples of Japanese-American elders: norms for persons with and without dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2005; 11(2):192-201
35. Satzger W, Hampel H, Padberg F, et al: Practical application of the CERAD test battery in screening for neuropsychological dementia. Nervenarzt 2001; 72(3):196-203
36. Welsh-Bohmer KA, Mohs RC: Neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1997; 49(3)(suppl 3):S11-S13
37. Hausknecht JP, Halpert JA, Di Paolo NT, et al: Retesting in selection: a meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. J Appl Psychol 2007; 92(2):373-385
38. Hickman SE, Howieson DB, Dame A, et al: Longitudinal analysis of the effects of the aging process on neuropsychological test performance in the healthy young-old and oldest-old. Dev Neu-ropsychol 2000; 17(3):323-337
39. Salthouse TA, Schroeder DH, Ferrer E: Estimating retest effects in longitudinal assessments of cognitive functioning in adults between 18 and 60 years of age. Dev Psychol 2004; 40(5):813-822
40. Valenzuela M, Sachdev P: Can cognitive exercise prevent the onset of dementia? Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with longitudinal follow-up. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 17(3):179-187
41. Riedel-Heller SG, Luppa M, Konig HH: [Institutionalization of mentally ill in old age]. Psychiatr Prax 2010; 37(2):53-55