Absolute magnetic susceptibility of rat brain tissue

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 876-879

  Peprah, Marcus K ^a   Astary, Garrett W ^b   Mareci, Thomas H ^b,c   Meisel, Mark W ^a,c  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

brain tissue; cerebellum; cerebral cortex; magnetic susceptibility; magnetometry

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETISM; MAGNETOMETERS; MAGNETOMETRY; QUANTUM INTERFERENCE DEVICES; RATS; SQUIDS;

BRAIN TISSUE; CEREBELLUM; CEREBRAL CORTEX; MEASURED VALUES; RAT BRAIN TISSUE; SUPERCONDUCTING QUANTUM INTERFERENCE; TIME EVOLUTIONS; TISSUE COMPOSITION;

TISSUE;

ABSOLUTE MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN TISSUE; CEREBELLUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS CALLOSUM; CORPUS STRIATUM; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HIPPOCAMPUS; MAGNETISM; MAGNETOMETER; MAGNETOMETRY; NONHUMAN; RAT; TIME; ANIMAL; BRAIN; IN VITRO STUDY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MAGNETIC PHENOMENA; RATS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85027932743     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24965     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. He X, Yablonskiy DA,. Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 13558-13563.
2. Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng, YN, Reichenbach JR,. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 612-618.
3. Shmueli K, de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Li TQ, Dodd SJ, Duyn JH,. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 1510-1522.
4. Davis LM, Spencer DD, Spencer SS, Bronen RA,. MR imaging of implanted depth and subdural electrodes: is it safe? Epilepsy Res 1999; 35: 95-98.
5. Blount JP, Cormier J, Kim H, Kankirawatana P, Riley KO, Knowlton RC,. Advances in intracranial monitoring. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25: E18.
6. Fiandaca MS, Varenika V, Eberling J, et al. Real-time MR imaging of adeno-associated viral vector delivery to the primate brain. NeuroImage 2009; 47: T27-T35.
7. Gimenez F, Krauze MT, Valles F, Hadaczek P, Bringas J, Sharma N, Forsayeth J, Bankiewicz KS,. Image-guided convection-enhanced delivery of GDNF protein into monkey putamen. Neuroimage 2011; 54: S189-S195.
8. Schrader B, Hamel W, Weinert D, Mehdorn HM,. Documentation of electrode localization. Movement Disorders 2002; 17: S167-S174.
9. Schenck JF,. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996; 23: 815-850.
10. Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R,. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985; 3: 329-343.
11. Santiesteban FMM, Swanson SD, Noll DC, Anderson DJ,. Magnetic resonance compatibility of multichannel silicon microelectrode systems for neural recording and stimulation: design criteria, tests, and recommendations. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006; 53: 547-558.
12. Rosen BR, Wedeen VJ, Brady TJ,. Selective saturation NMR imaging. J Comput Assisted Tomography 1984; 8: 813-814.
13. Astary GW, Peprah MK, Fisher CR, Stewart RL, Carney PR, Sarntinoranont M, Meisel MW, Manuel MV, Mareci TH,. MR measurement of alloy magnetic susceptibility: towards developing tissue- susceptibility matched metals. J Magn Reson 2013; 233: 49-55.
14. Astary GW,. MR-guided real-time convection-enhanced delivery. PhD thesis, University of Florida, 2011.
15. Li W, Wu B, Liu C,. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage 2011; 55: 1645-1656.
16. Shmueli K, Thomas DL, Ordidge RJ,. Design construction and evaluation of an anthromorphic head phantom with realistic susceptibility artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 202-207.
17. McIlwain H, Bachelard HS,. Biochemistry and the Central Nervous System. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1985. 660 p.
18. Sawicki M, Stefanowicz W, Ney A,. Sensitive SQUID magnetometry for studying nanomagnetism. Semicond Sci Technol 2011; 26: 064006.
19. Miller LL,. The response of longitudinal and transverse pickup coils to a misaligned magnetic dipole. Rev Sci Instrum 1996; 67: 3201-3207.
20. Zeiba A,. Image and sample geometry effects in SQUID magnetometers. Rev Sci Instrum 1993; 64: 3357-3375.
21. Regenold WT,. Lithium and increased hippocampal volume-more tissue or more water? Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33: 1773-1774.
22. Hüppi PS, Dubois J,. Diffusion tensor imaging of brain development. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2006; 11: 489-497.
23. Bush EC, Allman JM,. The scaling of white matter to gray matter in cerebellum and neocortex. Brain Behav Evol 2003; 61: 1-5.
24. Phatak P, Shaldivin A, King LS, Shapiro P, Regenold WT,. Lithium and inositol: effects on brain water homeostasis in the rat. Psychopharmacology 2006; 186: 41-47.
25. Lee J, Shmueli K, Fukunaga M, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyna JH,. Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 5130-5135.
26. Liu J, Liu T, de Rochefort L, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. NeuroImage 2012; 59; 2560-2568.
27. Schweser F, Sommer K, Deistung A, Reichenbach JR,. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain. NeuroImage 2012; 62: 2083-2100.
28. Wharton S, Schafer A, Bowtell R,. Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using threshold-based k-space division. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 1292-1304.