Using explicit instruction to teach science descriptors to students with autism spectrum disorder

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 378-389

  Knight, Victoria F ^a   Smith, Bethany R ^b   Spooner, Fred ^b   Browder, Diane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Autism spectrum disorder; Explicit instruction; Science content

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTISM; CASE REPORT; CHILD; CURRICULUM; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DISABLED PERSON; EDUCATION; ELEMENTARY STUDENT; HANDICAPPED CHILD; HUMAN; LEARNING; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SCIENCE; SPECIAL EDUCATION; TEACHING;

EID: 85027932130     PISSN: 01623257     EISSN: 15733432     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-011-1258-1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Agran, M., Cavin, M., Wehmeyer, M., & Palmer, S. (2006). Participation of students with moderate to severe disabilities in the general curriculum: The effects of the self-determined learning model of instruction. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 230-241.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4, text revision ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4. Anderson, S. R., & Romanczyk, R. G. (1999). Early intervention for young children with autism: Continuum-based behavioral models. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 162-173.
5. Anderson, S. R., Taras, M., & Cannon, B. O. (1996). Teaching new skills to young children with autism. In C. Maurice, G. Green,&S. C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism: A manual for parents and professionals (pp. 181-194). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
6. Billingsley, F., White, O., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
7. Bursuck, W. D., & Damer, M. (2007). Reading instruction for students who are at risk or have disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
9. Courtade, G. R., Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., & DiBiase, W. (2010). Training teachers to use an inquiry based task analysis to teach science with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 45, 378-399.
10. Durocher, J. S. (2011). Assessment for the purpose of instructional planning for students with autism spectrum disorders. In E. A. Boutot & B. S. Myles (Eds.), Autism spectrum disorders: Foundations, characteristics, and effective strategies (pp. 34-67). Boston, MA: Pearson.
11. Engleman, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theories of instruction: Principles and applications. Eugene, OR: ADI Press.
12. Flores, M. M., & Gantz, J. B. (2007). Effectiveness of direct instruction for teaching statement inference, use of facts, and analogies to students with developmental disabilities and reading delays. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 244-251.
13. Gantz, J. B., & Flores, M. M. (2009). The effectiveness of direct instruction for teaching language to children with autism spectrum disorders: Identifying materials. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 75-83.
14. Gast, D. L. (2010). Single-subject research in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
15. Gilliam, J. E. (1995). Gilliam autism rating scale. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
16. Heward, W. L. (1994). Three "low-tech" strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardner, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurable superior instruction (pp. 282-320). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17. Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., & Ralph, G. (1986). Generalization with precision: The role of negative teaching examples in the instruction of generalized grocery item selection. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11, 300-308.
18. Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189-196.
19. Horner, R. H., Williams, J. A., & Knobbe, C. (1985). The effect of "opportunity to perform" on the maintenance of skills learned by high school students with severe handicaps. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 172-175.
20. Jimenez, B., Knight, V., & Browder, D. M. (in press). Early science: An inquiry based approach for elementary students with moderate and severe disabilities. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
21. Jimenez, B., Spooner, F., Browder, D., DiBiase, W., & Knight, V. (2008). A conceptual model for science for students with significant cognitive disabilities. [Brochure]. Retrieved from http://www.education.uncc.edu/access/.
22. Kame'enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: Prevention of academic learning problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
23. Knight, V., Browder, D. M., Agnello, B., & Lee, A. (in press). Academic instruction in ELA, math, and science for students with severe disabilities [Invited manuscript]. Focus on Exceptional Children.
24. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1992). Science for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 62, 377-411.
25. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html.
26. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Repp, A. C., Karsh, K. G., Johnson, J. W., & VanLaarhoven, T. (1996). A comparison of multiple versus single examples of the correct stimulus on task acquisition and generalization by persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 213-230. (Pubitemid 126075209)
28. Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1980). The childhood autism rating scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
29. Spooner, F., DiBiase, W., & Courtade-Little, G. (2006). Science standards and functional skills: Finding the links. In D. M. Browder & F. Spooner (Eds.), Teaching language arts, math, & science to students with significant cognitive disabilities (pp. 229-243). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
30. Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D. M., Jimenez, B., & DiBiase, W. (2010). Evaluating evidence-based practices in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
31. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
32. VanLaarhoven, T., Johnson, J. W., Repp, A. C., Karsh, K. G., & Lenz, M. (2003). Discrimination training: A comparison of two procedures for presenting multiple exemplars within a fading and non-fading paradigm. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 1-18. (Pubitemid 36120537)
33. Wahlberg, T., & Magliano, J. P. (2004). The ability of high functioning individuals with autism to comprehend written discourse. Discourse Processes a Multidisciplinary Journal, 38, 119-144.