Predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury: Development of a novel computerized tomography classification system (Helsinki Computerized Tomography Score)

Neurosurgery

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 632-646

  Raj, Rahul ^a   Siironen, Jari ^a   Skrifvars, Markus B ^a   Hernesniemi, Juha ^a   Kivisaari, Riku ^a  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Computerized tomography; Helsinki CT; Marshall CT; Prediction model; Prognosis; Rotterdam CT; Sensitivity and specificity; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PREDICTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HELSINKI COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY SCORE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTERNAL VALIDITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARSHALL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY CLASSIFICATION SCORE; OPEN STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PUPIL REFLEX; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROTTERDAM COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY SCORE; SCORING SYSTEM; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

EID: 85027929911     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: 15244040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000533     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Maas AI, Murray GD, Roozenbeek B, et al. Advancing care for traumatic brain injury: findings from the IMPACT studies and perspectives on future research. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(12):1200-1210.
2. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81-84.
3. Marmarou A, Lu J, Butcher I, et al. Prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and pupil reactivity in traumatic brain injury assessed pre-hospital and on enrollment: an IMPACT analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):270-280.
4. Maas AI, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, et al. Prognostic value of computerized tomography scan characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):303-314.
5. Raj R, Skrifvars M, Bendel S, et al. Predicting six-month mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury: usefulness of common intensive care severity scores. Crit Care. 2014;18(2):R60.
6. Stocchetti N, Pagan F, Calappi E, et al. Inaccurate early assessment of neurological severity in head injury. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(9):1131-1140.
7. Shahin H, Gopinath SP, Robertson CS. Influence of alcohol on early Glasgow Coma Scale in head-injured patients. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):1176-1181; discussion 1181.
8. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Van Berkum Clark M. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg. 1991;75(11):S14-S22.
9. Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med. 2008;5 (8):e165.
10. Maas AI, Hukkelhoven CW, Marshall LF, Steyerberg EW. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery. 2005;57 (6):1173-1182; discussion 1173-1182.
11. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1(7905):480-484.
12. Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, XV: steroids. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(suppl 1): S91-S95.
13. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(1):40-44.
14. Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, Tomsick T, Huster G. Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage: a powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke. 1993;24(7):987-993.
15. Kothari RU, Brott T, Broderick JP, et al. The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke. 1996;27(8):1304-1305.
16. Gebel JM, Sila CA, Sloan MA, et al. Comparison of the ABC/2 estimation technique to computer-assisted volumetric analysis of intraparenchymal and subdural hematomas complicating the GUSTO-1 trial. Stroke. 1998;29(9): 1799-1801.
17. Moons KG, Harrell FE, Steyerberg EW. Should scoring rules be based on odds ratios or regression coefficients? J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(10): 1054-1055.
18. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2010;21(1):128-138.
19. Seshan VE, Gönen M, Begg CB. Comparing ROC curves derived from regression models. Stat Med. 2013;32(9):1483-1493.
20. Nagelkerke N. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. 1991;78(3):691-692.
21. Zhu BP, Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Klar J, Avrunin J, Teres D. Factors affecting the performance of the models in the Mortality Probability Model II system and strategies of customization: a simulation study. Crit Care Med. 1996; 24(1):57-63.
22. Moreno R, Apolone G. Impact of different customization strategies in the performance of a general severity score. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(12): 2001-2008.
23. Bakhshi-Raiez F, Peek N, Bosman RJ, de Jonge E, de Keizer NF. The impact of different prognostic models and their customization on institutional comparison of intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(11):2553-2560.
24. Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models. New York: Springer Verlag; 2010.
25. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S1 to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12:77.
26. Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JD, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22(10): 1025-1039.
27. Huang YH, Deng YH, Lee TC, Chen WF. Rotterdam computed tomography score as a prognosticator in head-injured patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(1):80-85.
28. Mata-Mbemba D, Mugikura S, Nakagawa A, et al. Early CT findings to predict early death in patients with traumatic brain injury: Marshall and Rotterdam CT scoring systems compared in the major academic tertiary care hospital in northeastern Japan. Acad Radiol. 2014;21(5):605-611.
29. Nelson DW, Nyström H, MacCallum RM, et al. Extended analysis of early computed tomography scans of traumatic brain injured patients and relations to outcome. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(1):51-64.
30. Jacobs B, Beems T, van der Vliet TM, Diaz-Arrastia RR, Borm GF, Vos PE. Computed tomography and outcome in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: hematoma volume and midline shift revisited. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(2): 203-215.
31. Jacobs B, Beems T, van der Vliet TM, Borm GF, Vos PE. The status of the fourth ventricle and ambient cisterns predict outcome in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(2):331-340.
32. Wardlaw JM, Easton VJ, Statham P. Which CT features help predict outcome after head injury? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(2):188-192; discussion 151.
33. Servadei F, Murray GD, Teasdale GM, et al. Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: demographic and clinical study of 750 patients from the European Brain Injury Consortium survey of head injuries. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(2):261-267; discussion 267-269.
34. LeRoux PD, Haglund MM, Newell DW, Grady MS, Winn HR. Intraventricular hemorrhage in blunt head trauma: an analysis of 43 cases. Neurosurgery. 1992;31 (4):678-684; discussion 684-685.
35. Lee JP, Lui TN, Chang CN. Acute post-traumatic intraventricular hemorrhage analysis of 25 patients with emphasis on final outcome. Acta Neurol Scand. 1991;84(2):85-90.
36. Jacobs B, Beems T, van der Vliet TM, et al. Outcome prediction in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a focus on computed tomography variables. Neurocrit Care. 2013;19(1):79-89.
37. Raj R, Siironen J, Kivisaari R, et al. External validation of the international mission for prognosis and analysis of clinical trials model and the role of markers of coagulation. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(2):305-311.
38. Panczykowski DM, Puccio AM, Scruggs BJ, et al. Prospective independent validation of IMPACT modeling as a prognostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(1):47-52.
39. Roozenbeek B, Chiu YL, Lingsma HF, et al. Predicting 14-day mortality after severe traumatic brain injury: application of the IMPACT models in the Brain Trauma Foundation TBI-trac New York State database. J Neurotrauma. 2012; 29(7):1306-1312.
40. Lingsma H, Andriessen TM, Haitsema I, et al. Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the IMPACT models and the role of extracranial injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(2):639-646.