Early CT findings to predict early death in patients with traumatic brain injury: Marshall and Rotterdam CT scoring systems compared in the major academic tertiary care hospital in Northeastern Japan

Academic Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 605-611

  Mata Mbemba, Daddy ^a   Mugikura, Shunji ^a   Nakagawa, Atsuhiro ^a   Murata, Takaki ^a   Ishii, Kiyoshi ^b   Li, Li ^a   Takase, Kei ^a   Kushimoto, Shigeki ^a   Takahashi, Shoki ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b SENDAI CITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

CT; Early death; Marshall; Rotterdam; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEATH; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARSHALL SCORE; MIDDLE AGED; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; ROTTERDAM SCORE; SCORING SYSTEM; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN INJURY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MORTALITY; PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; BRAIN INJURIES; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84897481777     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.017     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Marshall L.F., Eisenberg H., Jane J.A., et al. A new classification of head injury based on computed tomography. J Neurosurg 1991, 75:S14-S20.
2. Maas A.I., Hukkelhoven C.W., Marshall L.F., et al. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery 2005, 57:1173-1182. discussion 1173-1182.
3. Chun K.A., Manley G.T., Stiver S.I., et al. Interobserver variability in the assessment of CT imaging facture of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2010, 27:325-330.
4. Hilarioa A., Ramos A., Millan J.M., et al. Severe traumatic head injury: prognostic value of brain stem injuries detected at MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012, 33:1925-1931.
5. Nelson D.W., Nyström H., MacCallum R.M., et al. Extended analysis of early computed tomography scans of traumatic brain injured patients and relations to outcome. J Neurotrauma 2010, 27:51-64.
6. Katsnelson M., Mackenzie L., Frangos S., et al. Are initial radiology and clinical scales associated with subsequent intracranial pressure and brain oxygen level after severe traumatic brain injury?. Neurosurgery 2012, 70:1095-1105.
7. Huang Y.H., Deng Y.H., Lee T.C., et al. Rotterdam computed tomography score as a prognosticator in head-injured patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurgery 2012, 71:80-85.
8. Haydel M.J., Preston C.A., Mills T.J., et al. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 2000, 343:100-105.
9. Stiell I.G., Lesiuk H., Wells G.A., et al. Canadian CT head rule study for patients with minor head injury: methodology for phase II (validation and economic analysis). Ann Emerg Med 2001, 38:317-322.
10. Smits M., Dippel D.W., Nederkoorn P.J., et al. Minor head injury: CT-based strategies for management-a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 2010, 254:532-540.
11. Stocchetti N., Croci M., Spagnoli D., et al. Mass volume measurement in severe head injury: accuracy and feasibility of two pragmatic methods. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000, 68:14-17.
12. Jacobs B., Beems T., Van der Vliet T.M., et al. Computed tomography and outcome in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: hematoma volume and midline shift revisited. J Neurotrauma 2011, 28:203-215.
13. Maas A.I., Steyerberg E.W., Butcher I., et al. Prognostic value of computerized tomography scan characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24:303-314.
14. Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer series in statistics, Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc, 2001.
15. Steyerberg E.W., Mushkudiani N., Perel P., et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristic. PLoS Med 2008, 5:e165.
16. Lingsma H.F., Roozenbeek B., Steyerberg E.W., et al. Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions. Lancet Neurol 2010, 9:543-554.
17. Jacobs B., Beems T., Stulemeijer M., et al. Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities. J Neurotrauma 2010, 27:655-668.
18. Goldschlager T., Rosenfeld J.V., Winter C.D. 'Talk and die' patients presenting to a major trauma centre over a 10 year period: a critical review. J Clin Neurosci 2007, 14:618-623.
19. Report to congress on mild traumatic brain injury in the United States: steps to prevent serious public problem 2003, National center for injury prevention and control, center for disease control and prevention, Atlanta, GA.
20. Lee H., Wintermark M., Gean A.D., et al. Focal lesions in acute mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive outcome: CT versus 3T MRI. J Neurotrauma 2008, 25:1049-1056.