Paternal effects on the expression of a male polyphenism

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 3167-3178

  Buzatto, Bruno A ^a   Simmons, Leigh W ^a   Tomkins, Joseph L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Alternative reproductive tactics; Conditional strategy; Intrasexual dimorphism; Male dimorphism; Phenotypic plasticity; Threshold trait

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; DIMORPHISM; GENETIC STRUCTURE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MITE; PATERNAL EFFECT; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SCRAMBLE COMPETITION;

ACARI; RHIZOGLYPHUS ECHINOPUS;

EID: 85027928716     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01662.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bilde, T., U. Friberg, A. A. Maklakov, J. D. Fry, and G. Arnqvist 2008. The genetic architecture of fitness in a seed beetle: assessing the potential for indirect genetic benefits of female choice. BMC Evol. Biol. 8:11.
2. Brockmann, H. J. 2001. The evolution of alternative strategies and tactics. Adv. Stud. Behav. 30:1-51.
3. Burley, N. 1986. Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am. Nat. 127:415-445.
4. Buzatto, B. A., L. W. Simmons, and J. L. Tomkins 2012. Genetic variation underlying the expression of a polyphenism. J. Evol. Biol. 25:748-758.
5. Cockerham, C. C., and B. S. Weir 1977. Quadratic analysis of reciprocal crosses. Biometrics 33:187-203.
6. Crill, W. D., R. B. Huey, and G. W. Gilchrist 1996. Within- and between-generation effects of temperature on the morphology and physiology of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50:1205-1218.
7. Cunningham, E. J. A., and A. F. Russell 2000. Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404:74-77.
8. Dawkins, R. 1980. Good strategy or evolutionary stable strategy? Pp. 331-367 in G. W. Barlow and J. Silverberg, eds. Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? Westview, Boulder, CO
9. Day, T., and R. Bonduriansky 2004 Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 167:1537-1546.
10. Dempster, E. R., and I. M. Lerner 1950. Heritability of threshold characters. Genetics 35:212-236.
11. Dowling, D. K., M. Nystrand, and L. W. Simmons 2010. Maternal effects, but no good or compatible genes for sperm competitiveness in Australian crickets. Evolution 64:1257-1266.
12. Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
13. Fox, C. W., K. J. Waddell, and T. A. Mousseau 1995. Parental host-plant affects offspring life-histories in a seed beetle. Ecology 76:402-411.
14. Friberg, U., A. D. Stewart, and W. R. Rice 2012. X- and Y-chromosome linked paternal effects on a life-history trait. Biol. Lett. 8:71-73. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0608
15. Fry, J. D. 2004. Estimation of genetic variances and covariances by restricted maximum likelihood using PROC MIXED. Pp. 11-34 in A. Saxton, ed. Genetic analysis of complex traits using SAS. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
16. Garcia-Gonzalez, F., and L. W. Simmons 2007. Paternal indirect genetic effects on offspring viability and the benefits of polyandry. Curr. Biol. 17:32-36.
17. Giesel, J. T. 1986. Effects of parental photoperiod regime on progeny development time in Drosophila simulans. Evolution 40:649-651.
18. Gil, D., J. Graves, N. Hazon, and A. Wells 1999. Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286:126-128.
19. Grondziel, E. 1975. Sex chromosomes in Rhizoglyphus echinopus (F, & R.) (Acarina, Acaridae). Folia Biol. (Krakow) 23:69-72.
20. Gross, M. R. 1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:92-98.
21. Hazel, W. N. 2002. The environmental and genetic control of seasonal polyphenism in larval color and its adaptive significance in a swallowtail butterfly. Evolution 56:342-348.
22. Hazel, W. N., R. Smock, and M. D. Johnson 1990. A polygenic model for the evolution and maintenance of conditional strategies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242:181-187.
23. Hazel, W. N., R. Smock, and C. M. Lively 2004. The ecological genetics of conditional strategies. Am. Nat. 163:888-900.
24. Ivy, T. M. 2007. Good genes, genetic compatibility and the evolution of polyandry: use of the diallel cross to address competing hypotheses. J. Evol. Biol. 20:479-487.
25. Kolm, N. 2001. Females produce larger eggs for large males in a paternal mouthbrooding fish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:2229-2234.
26. Konior, M., J. Radwan, M. Kolodziejczyk, and L. Keller 2006. Strong association between a single gene and fertilization efficiency of males and fecundity of their mates in the bulb mite. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273:309-314.
27. Kotiaho, J. S., L. W. Simmons, J. Hunt, and J. L. Tomkins 2003. Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. Am. Nat. 161:852-859.
28. Lively, C. M., W. N. Hazel, M. J. Schellenberger, and K. S. Michelson 2000. Predator-induced defense: variation for inducibility in an intertidal barnacle. Ecology 81:1240-1247.
29. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MA
30. Maynard, Smith J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K
31. Moczek, A. P., and D. J. Emlen 2000. Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes? Anim. Behav. 59:459-466.
32. Moran, N. A. 1992. The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am. Nat. 139:971-989.
33. Mousseau, T. A., and D. A. Roff 1989. Adaptation to seasonality in a cricket-patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation in body size and diapause expression along a cline in season length. Evolution 43:1483-1496.
34. Pigliucci, M. 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:481-486.
35. Priest, N. K., D. A. Roach, and L. F. Galloway 2008. Cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and male seminal fluid. Biol. Lett. 4: 6-8.
36. Radwan, J. 1993. The adaptive significance of male polymorphism in the acarid mite Caloglyphus berlesei. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33:201-208.
37. Radwan J.. 2001. Male morph determination in Rhizoglyphus echinopus (Acaridae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 25:143-149.
38. Radwan J. 2009. Alternative mating tactics in acarid mites. Adv. Stud. Behav. 39:185-208.
39. Reinhold, K. 1999. Evolutionary genetics of sex-limited traits under fluctuating selection. J. Evol. Biol. 12:897-902.
40. Roff, D. A. 1994. The evolution of dimorphic traits-predicting the genetic correlation between environments. Genetics 136:395-401.
41. Roff D.A.. 1996. The evolution of threshold traits in animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 71:3-35.
42. Roff, D. A., and N. Sokolovska 2004. Extra-nuclear effects on growth and development in the sand cricket Gryllus firmus. J. Evol. Biol. 17:663-671.
43. Schwander, T., and L. Keller 2008. Genetic compatibility affects queen and worker caste determination. Science 322:552-552.
44. Schwander, T., N. Lo, M. Beekman, B. P. Oldroyd, and L. Keller 2010. Nature versus nurture in social insect caste differentiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:275-282.
45. Smallegange, I. M. 2011. Complex environmental effects on the expression of alternative reproductive phenotypes in the bulb mite. Evol. Ecol. 25:857-873.
46. Stewart, A. D., A. Pischedda, and W. R. Rice 2010. Resolving intralocus sexual conflict: genetic mechanisms and time frame. J. Hered. 101:S94-S99.
47. Suzuki, Y., and H. F. Nijhout 2006. Evolution of a polyphenism by genetic accommodation. Science 311:650-652.
48. Suzuki Y., Nijhout H.F.. 2008. Genetic basis of adaptive evolution of a polyphenism by genetic accommodation. J. Evol. Biol. 21:57-66.
49. Tomkins, J. L., and W. Hazel 2007. The status of the conditional evolutionarily stable strategy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:522-528.
50. Tomkins, J. L., W. N. Hazel, M. A. Penrose, J. Radwan, and N. R. Lebas 2011. Habitat complexity drives experimental evolution of a conditionally expressed secondary sexual trait. Curr. Biol. 21:569-573.
51. Tomkins, J. L., N. R. LeBas, J. Unrug, and J. Radwan 2004. Testing the status-dependent ESS model: population variation in fighter expression in the mite Sancassania berlesei. J. Evol. Biol. 17:1377-1388.
52. Walker, T. J. 1987. Wing dimorphism in Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 80:547-560.
53. Wedell, N. 1996. Mate quality affects reproductive effort in a paternally investing species. Am. Nat. 148:1075-1088.
54. West-Eberhard, M. J. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY
55. Wheeler, D. E. 1986. Developmental and physiological determinants of caste in social Hymenoptera-evolutionary implications. Am. Nat. 128:13-34.
56. Wright S. 1934a. An analysis of variability in number of digits in an inbred strain of guinea pigs. Genetics 19:0506-0536.
57. Wright S.. 1934b. The results of crosses between inbred strains of guinea pigs, differing in number of digits. Genetics 19:0537-0551.
58. Zera, A. J., and M. A. Rankin 1989. Wing dimorphism in Gryllus rubens-genetic-basis of morph determination and fertility differences between morphs. Oecologia 80:249-255.