Stem and osteotomy length are critical for success of the transfemoral approach and cementless stem revision

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 883-888

  De Menezes, Daniel F A ^a   Béguec, Pierre Le ^b   Sieber, Hans Peter ^a   Goldschild, Mathias ^b  

^a Department of Orthopaedics   (Switzerland)

^b Polyclinique Sévigné ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISLOCATION; FEMALE; FIXATION FAILURE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE HEALING; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TRANSFEMORAL APPROACH;

EID: 85027927085     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1998-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Amstutz HC, Maki S. Complications of trochanteric osteotomy in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:214-216. (Pubitemid 8311726)
2. Boisgard S, Moreau PE, Tixier H, Levai JP. [Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-month follow-up] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001;87:147-154. (Pubitemid 32290269)
3. Chen WM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA. Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1215-1219.
4. Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:55-62. (Pubitemid 38436559)
5. Engh CA Jr, Ellis TJ, Koralewicz LM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Sr. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:955-960. (Pubitemid 35462935)
6. Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz M, Fuerst M. A modified transfemoral approach using modular cementless revision stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462:105-114. (Pubitemid 47367851)
7. Frankel A, Booth RE Jr, Balderston RA, Cohn J, Rothman RH. Complications of trochanteric osteotomy: long-term implications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;288:209-213. (Pubitemid 23116932)
8. Grünig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE. Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116:187-197. (Pubitemid 27168311)
9. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An endresult study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737-755.
10. Hartwig CH, Böhm P, Czech U, Reize P, Küsswetter W. The Wagner revision stem in alloarthroplasty of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996;115:5-9. (Pubitemid 26003805)
11. Jando VT, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Trochanteric osteotomies in revision total hip arthroplasty: contemporary techniques and results. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54: 143-155.
12. Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, Milbrink J, Sahlstedt B. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis: 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:541-544.
13. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:839-847. (Pubitemid 28037651)
14. Mardones R, Gonzalez C, Cabanela ME, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Extended femoral osteotomy for revision of hip arthroplasty: results and complications. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:79-83. (Pubitemid 40127108)
15. Masri BA, Mitchell PA, Duncan CP. Removal of solidly fixed implants during revision hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:18-27.
16. Merle D'Aubigné R. [Numerical classification of the function of the hip. 1970] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1990;76:371-374.
17. Miner TM, Momberger NG, Chong D, Paprosky WL. The extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a critical review of 166 cases at mean 3-year, 9-month follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8 suppl 1):188-194. (Pubitemid 33151068)
18. Nozawa M, Shitoto K, Mastuda K, Maezawa K, Yasuma M, Kurosawa H. Transfemoral approach for revision total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122:288-290. (Pubitemid 36067921)
19. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-yearresults of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230-242.
20. Paprosky WG, Martin EL. Removal of well-fixed femoral and acetabular components. Am J Orthop. 2002;31:476-478.
21. Paprosky WG, Sporer SM. Controlled femoral fracture: easy in. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(3 suppl 1):91-93. (Pubitemid 36542569)
22. Paprosky WG, Weeden SH, Bowling JW Jr. Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 393:181-193. (Pubitemid 33101712)
23. Peters PC Jr, Head WC, Emerson RH Jr. An extended trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:158-159. (Pubitemid 23052441)
24. Schurman DJ, Maloney WJ. Segmental cement extraction at revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; 285:158-163.
25. Sugiyama H, Whiteside LA, Engh CA. Torsional fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty: the effect of surgical press-fit technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;275: 187-193.
26. Wagner M, Wagner H. [The transfemoral approach for revision of total hip replacement] [in German]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 1999;11:278-295.
27. Younger TI, Bradford MS, Magnus RE, Paprosky WG. Extended proximal femoral osteotomy: a new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:329-338.