Authorizing policy

Authorizing Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-150

  Hall, Thad ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027750067     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (181)

1. Aberbach, Joel D. 2001.”Republican Oversight.”Presented at the 2001 Midwest Political Science Association Meeting in Chicago, IL.
2. Aberbach, Joel D. 1990. Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
3. Aberbach, Joel D. 1979. “Changes in Congressional Oversight.” American Behavioral Scientist 22: 493-515.
4. Ainsworth, Scott. 1997. “The Role of Legislation in the Determination of Interest Group Influence in Legislatures.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 22: 517-34.
5. Aberbach, Joel D. 1993. “ReguLating Lobbyists and Interest Group Influence.” The Journal of Politics 55, 1: 41-56.
6. Art, Robert J. 1989. “The Pentagon: The Case for Biennial Budgeting.” Political Science Quarterly 104, 2: 193-214.
7. Art, Robert J. 1985. “Congress and the Defense Budget: Enhancing Policy Oversight.” Political Science Quarterly 100, 2: 227-48.
8. Balla, Steven J. 1998. “Administrative Procedures and Political Control of the Bureaucracy.”American Political Science Review 92, 3. (Sept., 1998): 663-73.
9. Balla, Steven J. and Christopher J. Deering. 2001.”Oversight over Time and across Committees:An Operational Measure of Police Patrols and Fire Alarms.”Presented at the 2001 Midwest Political Science Association Meeting in Chicago, IL.
10. Banks, Jeffrey S. 1989. “Agency Budgets, Cost Information, and Auditing.” American Journal of Political Science, 33, 3: 670-99.
11. Banks, Jeffrey S. and Barry R. Weingast. 1992. “The Political Control of Bureaucracies under Asymmetric Information.” American Journal of Political Science 36, 2: 509-24.
12. Bauer, Raymond A., Ithiel de Sola Pool, and Lewis Anthony Dexter. 1972.American Business & Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade. 2nd ed. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
13. Baumann, David. 1999. “Government on Autopilot.” The National Journal (March 13): 688-92.
14. Baumgartner, Frank R. and Bryan D. Jones. 1993.Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Baumgartner, Frank R. and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16. Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N.Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1997.”Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42, 4: 1260-88.
17. Bendor, Jonathan and Terry M. Moe. 1986. “Agenda Control, Committee Capture, and the Dynamics of Institutional Politics.”American Political Science Review 80, 4: 1187-1207.
18. Berry, Jeffrey M. 2000. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19. Binder, Sarah A. 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock.” American Political Science Review 93, 3: 519-34.
20. Birnbaum, Jeffrey. 1987. Showdown at Gucci Gulch. New York: Random House.
21. Bond, Jon R. and Richard Fleisher. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Brady, David and Barbara Sinclair. 1984. “Building Majorities for Policy Changes in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 46, 4: 1033-60.
23. Browne, William P. and Won K.Paik. 1993.”Beyond the Domain:Recasting Network Politics in the Postreform Congress.”American Journal of Political Science 37, 4: 1054-78.
24. Burkhead, Jesse. 1956. Government Budgeting. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
25. Caiden, Naomi. 1983. “Guidelines to Federal Budget Reform.” Public Budgeting & Finance 3: 4-22.
26. Calderia, Gregory A. and John R. Wright. 1990. “Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court:Who Participates, When, and How Much?” The Journal of Politics 52, 3: 782-806.
27. Calderia, Gregory A. and John R. Wright. 1988.”Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82, 4: 1109-27.
28. Cohen, Jeffrey E. 1995. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 87-107.
29. Collender, Stanley E. 1997. The Guide to the Federal Budget: Fiscal Year 1997. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
30. Committee on the Budget. 1997. The Congressional Budget Process: An Explanation. Washington, DC: United States Senate. Committee Print: 104-70.
31. Congressional Budget Office. 1990-2000. Unauthorized Appropriations and Expiring Authorizations.Washington, DC: The Congress of the United States.
32. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1998a. “Dispute over Competition Leads to Interim Six-Month Reauthorization of FAA.” 24-34-24-35.
33. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1998b. “Transportation Law Benefits Those Who Held the Purse Strings.” 24-3-24-12.
34. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1994a.”FAA Reauthorized for Three Years.” 168-69.
35. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1994b.”Lawmakers Renew and Revamp 1965 Education Act.” 383-96.
36. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1993. “Transportation Programs Score Big Gains.” 663-70.
37. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1991. “Air Bag Mandates Moved.” 15.
38. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1988. “Consumer Product Safety.” 580-81.
39. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1977.”How Wright Fashioned His Victory.” 6.
40. Cook, Brain J. 1989. “Principal-Agent Models of Political Control of Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 83, 3: 965-78.
41. Cox, Gary W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42. Cox, James Harrington. 1996. Struggling with Control without Losing Control: Congressional Use of Temporary Authorization to Control Bureaucratic Implementation. Dissertation: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
43. Dawson, Raymond H. 1962.”Congressional Innovation and Intervention in Defense Policy: Legislative Authorization of Weapons Systems.” The American Political Science Review 56, 1: 42-57.
44. Deering, Christopher J. and Steven S. Smith. 1997. Committees in Congress. 3rd ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
45. Denzau, Arthur T. and Robert J.Mackay. 1983.”Gatekeeping and Monopoly Power of Committees: An Analysis of Sincere and Sophisticated Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 27, 4: 740-61.
46. Diermeier, Daniel and Timothy J. Federsen. 2000. “Information and Congressional Hearings.”American Journal of Political Science 44, 1: 51-65.
47. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Richard L. Schott. 1979. Congress and the Administrative State. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
48. Downs, Anthony. 1972.”Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle. Public Interest 28: 38-50.
49. Easton, David. 1957. “An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems.” World Politics 9: 383-400.
50. Eavey, Cheryl L. and Gary J. Miller. 1984. “Bureaucratic Agenda Control: Imposition or Bargaining?”American Political Science Review 78, 3: 719-33.
51. Edelman, Murray. 1985. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Chicago:University of Illinois Press.
52. Edwards, George C. III. 1989. At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
53. Edwards, George C. III and Ira Sharkansky. 1978. The Policy Predicament: Making and Implementing Public Policy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
54. Edwards, George C. III and B. Dan Wood. 1999. “Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media. American Political Science Review 93, 2: 327-44.
55. Epstein, David and Sharyn O’Halloran. 1996.”Divided Government and the Design of Administrative Procedures: A Formal Model and Empirical Test.”The Journal of Politics 58, 2: 373-97.
56. Epstein, David and Sharyn O’Halloran. 1994. “Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion: Slack vs. Flexibility.”American Journal of Political Science 38: 697-722.
57. Ethridge, Marcus E. 1984. “A Political-Institutional Interpretation of Legislative Oversight Mechanisms & Behavior.” Polity 17, 2: 340-59.
58. Evans, Diana M. 1994.”Policy and Pork: The Use of Pork Barrel Projects to Build Policy Coalitions in the House of Representatives.”American Journal of Political Science 38, 4: 894-917.
59. Faucheux, Ron. 1995. “The Grassroots Lobbying Explosion in the U.S.” Campaigns and Elections 16, 1: 20-25.
60. Fenno, Richard F. 1997. Learning to Govern. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
61. Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
62. Fenno, Richard F. 1966. The Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.
63. Ferejohn, John A. 1986.”Logrolling in an Institutional Context: A Case Study of Food Stamp Legislation.”In Congress and Policy Change. Eds. Gerald C.Wright, Jr., Leroy N. Rieselbach, and Lawrence C. Dodd. New York: Agathon.
64. Ferejohn, John A. 1974. Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947-1968. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65. Fesler, James W. and Donald F. Kettle. 1996. The Politics of the Administrative Process. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
66. Finer, Herman. 1941. “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government.” Public Administration Review 1 (Summer): 335-50.
67. Fiorina, Morris. 1977. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven: Yale University Press.
68. Fisher, Louis. 1983. “Annual Authorizations: Durable Roadblocks to Biennial Budgeting.” Public Budgeting & Finance 3: 23-40.
69. Fisher, Louis. 1979. “The Authorization-Appropriations Process in Congress: Formal Rules and Informal Practices.” Catholic University Law Review.
70. Fisher, Louis. 1975. Presidential Spending Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
71. Fleming, Roy B., B. Dan Wood, and John Bohte. 1999. “Attention to Issues in a System of Separated Powers: The Macrodynamics of America Policy Agendas.” Journal of Politics 61, 1: 76-108.
72. Fox, Douglas M. and Charles H. Clapp. 1970. “The House Rules Committee’s Agenda-Setting Function, 1961-1968.” Journal of Politics 32, 2: 440-43.
73. Galloway, George B. 1951.”The Operation of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946.” The American Political Science Review 45, 1: 41-68.
74. Gill, Jeff. 1999.”The Insignificance of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.”Political Research Quarterly 52, 3: 647-74.
75. Goodnow, Frank J. 1900. Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. New York: Russell & Russell.
76. Gordon, John Steele. 1997.Hamilton’s Blessing: The Extraordinary Life and Times of Our National Debt. New York:Walker.
77. Greene, William H. 1997. Econometric Analysis. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
78. Hall, Richard L. 1996. Participation in Congress.New Haven:Yale University Press.
79. Hall, Richard L. and Bernard Grofman. 1990.”The Committee Assignment Process and the Conditional Nature of Committee Bias.”The American Political Science Review 84, 4: 1149-66.
80. Hall, Thad E. and Laurence J.O’Toole, Jr. 2004.”Shaping Formal Networks through the Regulatory Process.” Administration and Society (forthcoming).
81. Hall, Thad E. 2000. “Structures for Policy Implementation: An Analysis of National Legislation, 1965-1966 and 1993-1994.”Administration & Society 31, 6: 667-86.
82. Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, John Jay. 1961. The Federalist Papers. Edited by Clinton Rossiter. New York: NAL Penguin.
83. Hammond, Thomas H. 1986. “Agenda Control, Organizational Structure, and Bureaucratic Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 30: 379-420.
84. Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919-1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85. Hansen, John Mark. 1985. “The Political Economy of Group Membership.” American Political Science Review 79: 79-96.
86. Harbridge, Laurel. 2003. “Bill Introductions and Short-Term Authorizations.” Senior Thesis, University of Colorado (conducted under the supervision of Scott Adler).
87. Havemann, Joel. 1978. Congress and the Budget. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
88. Heinz, John P., Edward O. Laumann, Robert L. Nelson, and Robert H.Salisbury. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89. Henry, Nicholas. 1992. Public Administration and Public Affairs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
90. Ippolito, Dennis. 1981.Congressional Spending: A Twentieth Century Report. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
91. Jefferson, Thomas. 1977. The Portable Thomas Jefferson. Edited by Merrill D.Peterson. New York: Penguin Books.
92. Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Gilbert K. St. Clair, and Brian Woods. 1991. “Explaining Change in Policy Subsystems:Analysis of Coalition Stability and Defection Over Time.” American Journal of Political Science 35, 4: 851-80.
93. Jones, Bryan D., Frank R.Baumgartner, and Jeffrey C.Talbert. 1993.”The Destruction of Issue Monopolies in Congress.” American Political Science Review 87, 3: 657-71.
94. Kennedy, Peter. 1998. A Guide to Econometrics. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95. Kerwin, Cornelius M. 1999. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
96. Kiewiet, D. Roderick and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
97. King, David. 1997. Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
98. Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
99. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory ofU.S. Lawmaking. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
100. Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
101. Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Are Congressional Committees Composed of Preference Outliers?” The American Political Science Review 84, 1: 149-63.
102. Krehbiel, Keith. 1987. “Why Are Congressional Committees Powerful?” American Political Science Review 81: 929-35.
103. Lee, Frances E. 2003.”Geographic Politics in the U.S.House of Representatives: Coalition Building and Distribution of Benefits.” American Journal of Political Science 47, 4: 714-28.
104. Lee, Frances E. 1998.”Representation and Public Policy: The Consequences of Senate Apportionment for the Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds.” Journal of Politics 60, 1: 34-62.
105. LeLoup, Lance T. 1980. The Fiscal Congress.Westport, CT: Greenview Press.
106. Light, Paul C. 1991. The President’s Agenda. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
107. Loomis, Burdette. 1994. Time, Politics, and Policies: A Legislative Year. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
108. Lynn, Laurence E., Jr., Carolyn J.Heinrich, and Carolyn J.Hill. 2001. Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
109. Mayhew, David. 1974.Congress: The Electoral Connection.New Haven:Yale University Press.
110. McCubbins, Mathew D. 1985. “The Legislative Design of Regulatory Structure.” American Journal of Political Science: 721-48.
111. McCubbins, Mathew, Roger Noll, and Barry Weingast. 1989.”Structure and Process, Politics and Policy:Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies.”Virginia Law Review, 431-83.
112. McCubbins, Mathew, Roger Noll, and Barry Weingast. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization: 243-77.
113. McCubbins, Mathew and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms.”American Journal of Political Science 28: 165-79.
114. McGuire, Kevin T. and Gregory A. Calderia. 1996. “Issues, Agendas, and Decision Making on the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 90, 4: 853-65.
115. McGuire, Kevin T. 1993. “Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting and the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review, 87, 3: 717-26.
116. Menard, Scott. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
117. Meyers, Roy T. 1997. “Late Appropriations and Government Shutdowns: Frequency, Causes, Consequences, and Remedies.” Public Budgeting & Finance 17: 25-38.
118. Meyers, Roy T. 1988. “Biennial Budgeting by the U.S. Congress.” Public Budgeting & Finance 8: 21-32.
119. Milbank, Dana. 2002. “Karl Rove, Adding to His To-Do List.”Washington Post. June 25: A-17.
120. Moe, Terry M. 1984. “The New Economics of Organization.” American Journal of Political Science 78: 739-77.
121. Montjoy, Robert S. and Laurence J.O’Toole, Jr. 1979.”Toward a Theory of Policy Implementation: An Organizational Prospective.” Public Administration Review: 465-76.
122. Mouw, Calvin J. and Michael B.MacKuen. 1992.”The Strategic Agenda in Legislative Politics.” American Political Science Review 86, 1: 87-105.
123. Munger, Michael C. 1988.”Allocation of Desirable Committee Assignments: Extended Queues versus Committee Expansion.” American Journal of Political Science 32, 2: 317-44.
124. Nakamura, Robert T. and Frank Smallwood. 1980. The Politics of Policy Implementation. New York: St.Martin’s Press.
125. Niskanen, William A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
126. Ogul, Morris S. 1976. Congress Oversees the Bureaucracy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
127. Ogul, Morris S. and Bert A. Rockman. 1990. “Overseeing Oversight: New Departures and Old Problems.” Legislative Studies Quarterly XV, 1: 5-24.
128. Oleszek, Walter J. 1989. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
129. Ostrom, Vincent. 1989. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
130. O’Toole, Jr., Laurence J. and Thad E. Hall. N.D. “Agencies as Agents?: Units of Analysis for Exploring Oversight and Control.” Unpublished manuscript.
131. Pressman, Jeffrey L. and Aaron Wildavsky. 1984. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland: Or, Why It’s Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
132. Rochefort, David and Roger Cobb. 1994. The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
133. Rockman, Bert A. 1984. “Legislative-Executive Relations and Legislative Oversight.” Legislative Studies Quarterly IX, 3: 387-440.
134. Rogers, James R. 1998. “Bicameral Sequence: Theory and State Legislative Evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 42, 4: 1025-60.
135. Rosenbloom, David H. 2000. Building a Legislative-Centered Public Administration: Congress and the Administrative State, 1946-1999. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
136. Sabatier, Paul A. and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. 1999. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment.” In Theories of the Policy Process. Ed. Paul Sabatier. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
137. Sabatier, Paul A. and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.). 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
138. Salisbury, Robert H. and Kenneth A. Shepsle. 1981. “Congressman as Enterprise.” Legislative Studies Quarterly VI: 559-76.
139. Sayrs, Lois W. 1989. Pooled Time Series Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
140. Scher, Seymour. 1963. “Conditions for Legislative Control.” Journal of Politics 25: 526-51.
141. Schick, Allen. 1995. The Federal Budget: Politics, Policy, and Process. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
142. Schick, Allen. 1983.Making Economic Policy in Congress.Washington, DC:American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
143. Schick, Allen. 1980. Congress and Money: Budgeting, Spending, and Taxing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
144. Schlozman, Kay Lehman and John T.Tierney. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
145. Schlozman, Kay Lehman and John T.Tierney. 1983.”More of the Same:Washington Pressure Group Activity in a Decade of Change.” The Journal of Politics 45, 2: 351-77.
146. Shafritz, Jay M. and Albert C.Hyde. 1997. Classics of Public Administration. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
147. Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle: Democratic Committee Assignments in the Modern House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
148. Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Mark S. Bonchek. 1997. Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behaviors, and Institutions. New York:W.W. Norton.
149. Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Barry R. Weingast. 1987a. “The Institutional Foundation of Committee Power.”American Political Science Review 81: 85-104.
150. Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Barry R. Weingast. 1987b. “Why Are Congressional Committees Powerful: Reply to Krehbiel.” American Political Science Review 8, 1: 935-44.
151. Shuman, Howard E. 1992.Politics and the Budget: The Struggle between the President and the Congress. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Simon and Schuster.
152. Sinclair, Barbara. 1997.Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
153. Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The U.S. House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
154. Skowronek, Stephen. 1993. The Politics That Presidents Make. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1993.
155. Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
156. Skowronek, Stephen and Karen Orren. 1994. “Beyond the Iconography of Order:Notes for a ‘New Institutionalism.'" In The Dynamics of American Politics. Eds. Lawrence Dodd and Calvin Jillson. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
157. Smith, Steven S. and Christopher J. Deering. 1990.Committees in Congress. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
158. Steinberg, Jacques. 2001.”Bush’s Plan to Push Reading in ‘Head Start’ Stirs Debate.” The New York Times. February 10: A-1.
159. Stewart, Charles H. 1989. Budget Reform Politics: The Design of the Appropriations Process in the House of Representatives, 1986-1921. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
160. Stienmo, Sven et al. (Eds.). 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
161. Stone, Deborah A. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York:W.W. Norton.
162. Stone, P. H. 1997. “Business Strikes Back.” National Journal 29, 43: 2130-33.
163. Talbert, Jeffrey C., Bryan D. Jones, and Frank R. Baumgartner. 1995. “Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress.”American Journal of Political Science 39, 2: 383-405.
164. Taylor, Andrew J. 2001. “Congress as Principal: Exploring Bicameral Differences in Agent Oversight.” Congress & the Presidency 28, 2: 141-59.
165. Thurber, James A. 1997. “Congressional Budget Reform: Impact on the Appropriations Committees.” Public Budgeting & Finance 17: 62-73.
166. Tiefer, Charles. 1989. Congressional Practice and Procedure: A Reference, Research, and Legislative Guide. New York: Greenwood Press.
167. True, James L., Bryan D. Jones, and Frank R. Baumgartner. 1999. “Punctuated-Equilibrum Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in American Policymaking.” In Theories of the Policy Process. Ed. Paul Sabatier. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
168. U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News. 1965. “Public Law 89-4.” U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News. New York: West Group.
169. Wanat, John. 1978. Introduction to Budgeting. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
170. Weaver, R. Kent. 1988. Automatic Government: The Politics of Indexation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
171. Weingast, Barry R. 1984.”The Congressional-Bureaucratic System: A Principal Agent Perspective (with application to the SEC). Public Choice 44: 147-91.
172. Weingast, Barry R. and William Marshall. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress. Journal of Political Economy 96: 132-63.
173. White, Leonard D. 1951. The Jeffersonians. New York: Macmillan Company.
174. White, Leonard D. 1948. The Federalists. New York: Macmillan.
175. White, Leonard D. 1926. Introduction to the Study of Public Administration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
176. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1992. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
177. Wildavsky, Aaron and Naomi Caiden. 1997. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process, 1997. 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
178. Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
179. Wilson, Woodrow. 1887. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 2.
180. Wood, Dan B. and Jeffrey S. Peake. 1998.”The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting.” American Political Science Review 92, 1: 173-84.
181. Wright, John R. 1996. Interest Groups & Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.