Human factor and usability testing of a binocular optical coherence tomography system

Translational Vision Science and Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2017, Pages

  Chopra, Reena ^a   Mulholland, Pádraig J ^a,b   Dubis, Adam M ^a   Anderson, Roger S ^a,b   Keane, Pearse A ^a  

^a MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automated; Binocular; Diagnostics; Human factors; Optical coherence tomography; Usability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; EYE DISEASE; EYE EXAMINATION; EYE MOVEMENT; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LIKERT SCALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PERIMETRY; PUPILLOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETINA DISEASE; STRABISMUS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 85027721404     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21642591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/tvst.6.4.16     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178– 1181.
2. Keane PA, Sadda SR. Retinal imaging in the twenty-first century: state of the art and future directions. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2489–2500.
3. News. OCT Estimates of Ophthalmic OCT Market Size and the Dramatic Reduction in Reimbursement Payments. 2012. Available at: www.octnews.org. Accessed January 26, 2017.
4. Murray TG, Tornambe P, Dugel P, Tong KB. Evaluation of economic efficiencies in clinical retina practice: activity-based cost analysis and modeling to determine impacts of changes in patient management. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5: 913–925.
5. Dugel PU, Tong KB. Development of an activity-based costing model to evaluate physician office practice profitability. Ophthalmology. 2011;118: 203–208, e201–e203.
6. Van Vliet EJ, Bredenhoff E, Sermeus W, Kop LM, Sol JC, Van Harten WH. Exploring the relation between process design and efficiency in high-volume cataract pathways from a lean thinking perspective. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:83–93.
7. McMullen M, Netland PA. Wait time as a driver of overall patient satisfaction in an ophthalmology clinic. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2013;7:1655.
8. Callaway NF, Park JH, Maya-Silva J, Leng T. Thinking lean: improving vitreoretinal clinic efficiency by decentralizing optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2016;36:335–341.
9. Walsh AC. Binocular optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011; 42(Suppl):S95–S105.
10. Martin JL, Norris BJ, Murphy E, Crowe JA. Medical device development: the challenge for ergonomics. Appl Ergon. 2008;39:271–283.
11. Lee C, Coughlin JF. Perspective: older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J Prod Innov Manage. 2015;32:747–759.
12. Wiklund ME, Kendler J, Strochlic AY. Usability testing of medical devices. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2016.
13. Faulkner L. Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2005;35:379–383.
14. US Food and Drug Administration. Applying human factors and usability engineering to optimize medical device design. Rockville, MA: FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health; 2011:1–45.
15. Grulkowski I, Liu JJ, Potsaid B, et al. Retinal, anterior segment and full eye imaging using ultrahigh speed swept source OCT with vertical-cavity surface emitting lasers. Biomed Opt Express. 2012;3:2733–2751.
16. Dai C, Zhou C, Fan S, et al. Optical coherence tomography for whole eye segment imaging. Opt Express. 2012;20:6109–6115.
17. Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH, et al. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:194–205.
18. Menon D, Stafinski T. Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11:75–89.
19. Shah SG, Robinson I. Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:131–137.
20. Wild JM, Dengler-Harles M, Searle AET, O’Neill EC, Crews SJ. The influence of the learning effect on automated perimetry in patients with suspected
21. Keane PA, Balaskas K, Sim DA, et al. Automated analysis of vitreous inflammation using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2015;4(5):4.