Eligibility screening in evidence synthesis of environmental management topics

Environmental Evidence

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Frampton, Geoff K ^a   Livoreil, Barbara ^b   Petrokofsky, Gillian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b Domain du Petit Arbois   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bias; Eligibility criteria; Inclusion criteria; Quality; Reviewer agreement; Study selection; Systematic map; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027716989     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20472382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13750-017-0102-2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. CEE (Collaboration for Environmental Evidence). Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management. Version 4.2. 2013. http://www.environmentalevidence.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Review-guidelines-version-4.2-final.pdf.
2. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. EFSA J. 2010;8(6):1637.
3. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
4. Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006.
5. James KL, Randall NP, Haddaway NR. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environ Evid. 2016;5:7.
6. Bayliss HR, Beyer FR. Information retrieval for ecological syntheses. Res Synth Methods. 2015;6(2):136-48.
7. Livoreil B, Glanville G, Haddaway NR, Bayliss H, Bethel A, Flammerie de la Chapelle F, Robalino S, Savilaakso S, Zhou W, Petrokofsky G, Frampton G. Systematic searching for environmental evidence using multiple tools and sources. Environ Evid. 2017;6:23.
8. Roe D, Booker F, Day M, Zhou W, Allebone-Webb S, Hill NAO, Kumpel N, Petrokofsky G, Redford K, Russell D, Shepherd G, Wright J, Sunderland TCH. Are alternative livelihood projects effective at reducing local threats to specified elements of biodiversity and/or improving or maintaining the conservation status of those elements? Environ Evid. 2015;4:22.
9. Aiassa E, Higgins JPT, Frampton GK, Greiner M, Alfonso A, Amzal B, Deeks J, Dorne JL, Glanville J, Lovei GL, Nienstedt K, O'Connor AM, Pullin A, Rajic A, Verloo D. Applicability and feasibility of systematic review for performing evidence-based risk assessment in food and feed safety. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55:1026-34.
10. DEFRA (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs). Emerging tools and techniques to deliver timely and cost effective evidence reviews. London: DEFRA; 2015.
11. Rooney AR, Boyles AL, Wolfe MS, Bucher JR, Thayer KA. Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(7):711-8.
12. Sargent JM, O'Connor AM. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions II: relevance screening, data extraction, assessing risk of bias, presenting the results and interpreting the findings. Zoonoses Public Health. 2014;61(suppl 1):39-51.
13. Campbell Collaboration. Systematic reviews: policies and guidelines version 1.2. Oslo: The Steering Group of the Campbell Collaboration; 2014.
14. CRD (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination). Systematic reviews. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York; 2009.
15. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 151-86.
16. Higgins JPT, Lasserson T, Chandler J, Tovey D, Churchill R. Methodological expectations of Cochrane intervention reviews (MECIR). London: Cochrane; 2016.
17. Institute of Medicine. Finding what works in health care. Standards for systematic reviews. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies; 2011.
18. McDonagh M, Peterson K, Raina P, Chang S, Shekelle P. Avoiding bias in selecting studies - methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2013.
19. Social Science Research Unit. Eppi Reviewer 4. London: Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2016. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?alias=eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/er4. Accessed July 2017.
20. Rathbone J, Hoffman T, Glasziou P. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers. Syst Rev. 2015;4:80.
21. Tramer MR, Reynolds DJ, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. BMJ. 1997;315:635-40.
22. Englund G, Sarnelle O, Cooper SD. The importance of data-selection criteria: meta-analyses of stream predation experiments. Ecology. 1999;80(4):1132-41.
23. Rodriguez LG, Hogarth NJ, Zhou W, Xie C, Zhang K, Putzel L. China's conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects. Environ Evid. 2016;5:21.
24. Ojanen M, Zhou W, Miller DC, Nieto SH, Mshale B, Petrokofsky G. What are the environmental impacts of property rights regimes in forests, fisheries and rangelands? Environ Evid. 2017;6:12.
25. Choi WS, Song SW, Ock SM, Kim CM, Lee J, Chang WJ, Kim SH. Duplicate publication of articles used in meta-analysis in Korea. Springer Plus. 2014;3:182.
26. von Elm E, Tramer MR, Jüni P, Egger M. Does duplicate publication of trials introduce bias in systematic reviews? A systematic review [abstract]. In: 11th Cochrane Colloquium: 2003 Oct 26-31; Barcelona, Spain.
27. von Elm E, Poglia G, Walder B, Tramer MR. Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. JAMA. 2004;291:974-80.
28. Bailey BJ. Duplicate publication in the field of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol. 2002;126:211-6.
29. Barden J, Edwards JE, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Oral valdecoxib and injected parecoxib for acute postoperative pain: a quantitative systematic review. BMC Anesthesiol. 2003;3:1.
30. Gøtzsche P. Multiple publication of reports of drug trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;36:429-32.
31. Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA. Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses? BMJ. 2012;345:e7031.
32. Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. Stat Med. 2002;21:1635-40.
33. Langer L, Erasmus Y, Tannous N, Stewart R. How stakeholder engagement has led us to reconsider definitions of rigour in systematic reviews. Environ Evid. 2017;6:20.
34. Altman DG. Measuring agreement. In: Altman DG, editor. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
35. Petersen K, bin Ali N. Identifying strategies for study selection in systematic reviews and maps. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), Banff, AB, Canada, September 2011.
36. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Goetzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
37. Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Bastian H, Chalmers I, et al. PRISMA for abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts. PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001419.
38. Sagoo GS, Little J, Higgins JPT. Systematic reviews of genetic association studies. PLoS Med. 2009;6(3):e1000028.