Corpus for coreference resolution on scientific papers

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3187-3190

  Chaimongkol, Panot ^a   Aizawa, Akiko ^a   Tateisi, Yuka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Annotated corpus; Coreference resolution; Scientific domain

Indexed keywords

EXTRACTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

ANNOTATED CORPUS; ANNOTATION SCHEME; CO-REFERENCE RESOLUTIONS; KNOWLEDGE EXTRACTION; MACHINE LEARNING MODELS; MESSAGE UNDERSTANDING CONFERENCES; SCIENTIFIC DOMAIN; SCIENTIFIC PAPERS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85027709742     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Amit Bagga and Breck Baldwin. 1998. Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. In In The First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation Workshop on Linguistics Coreference, pages 563-566.
2. Nancy A. Chinchor. 1998. Overview of MUC-7/MET-2. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Message Understanding, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. K. Bretonnel Cohen, Arrick Lanfranchi, William Corvey, William A. Baumgartner Jr., Christophe Roeder, Philip V. Ogren, Martha Palmer, and Lawrence E. Hunter. 2010. Annotation of all coreference in biomedical text: Guideline selection and adaptation. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Building and Evaluating Resources for Biomedical Text Mining (BioTxtM-2010), pages 37-41.
4. George R. Doddington, Alexis Mitchell, Mark A. Przybocki, Lance A. Ramshaw, Stephanie Strassel, and Ralph M. Weischedel. 2004. The Automatic Content Extraction (ACE) program - tasks, data, and evaluation. In LREC. European Language Resources Association.
5. Su Nam Kim, Olena Medelyan, Min-Yen Kan, and Timothy Baldwin. 2010. SemEval-2010 Task 5: Automatic Keyphrase Extraction from Scientific Articles. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 21-26, Los Angeles, California. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Peder Olesen Larsen and Markus von Ins. 2010. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by science citation index. Scientometrics, 84(3):575-603.
7. Heeyoung Lee, Angel Chang, Yves Peirsman, Nathanael Chambers, Mihai Surdeanu, and Dan Jurafsky. 2013. Deterministic coreference resolution based on entity-centric, precision-ranked rules. Computational Linguistics, 39(4):885-916.
8. Appendix D: Coreference task definition (v2.3). In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Message Understanding, MUC6'95, pages 335-344, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Ulrich Schäfer, Christian Spurk, and Jörg Steffen. 2012. A fully coreference-annotated corpus of scholarly papers from the ACL anthology. In Proceedings of COLING 2012: Posters, pages 1059-1070, Mumbai, India, December. The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee.
10. Pontus Stenetorp, Sampo Pyysalo, Goran Topić, Tomoko Ohta, Sophia Ananiadou, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2012. brat: a web-based tool for NLP-assisted text annotation. In Proceedings of the Demonstrations at the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 102-107, Avignon, France, April. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Veselin Stoyanov, Nathan Gilbert, Claire Cardie, and Ellen Riloff. 2009. Conundrums in Noun Phrase Coreference Resolution: Making Sense of the State-of-the-Art. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing (ACL-IJCNLP 2009).
12. Marc Vilain, John Burger, John Aberdeen, Dennis Connolly, and Lynette Hirschman. 1995. A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Message Understanding, MUC6'95, pages 45-52, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.