Draft genome sequence of sphingobacterium sp. CZ-UAM, isolated from a methanotrophic consortium

Genome Announcements

Volumn 5, Issue 33, 2017, Pages

  Steffani Vallejo, José Luis ^a   Zuñiga, Cristal ^b,c   Cruz Morales, Pablo ^a   Lozano, Luis ^d   Morales, Marcia ^e   Licona Cassani, Cuauhtemoc ^a,e   Revah, Sergio ^b   Utrilla, José ^d  

^a StrainBiotech   (Mexico)

^b DEPARTAMENTO DE PROCESOS Y TECNOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^d INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS FÍSICAS   (Mexico)

^e SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA BASE COMPOSITION; GENOME; NONHUMAN; SPHINGOBACTERIUM;

EID: 85027676234     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21698287     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00792-17     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Goodland R, Anhang J. 2009. Livestock and climate change: what if the key actors in climate change are. . .cows, pigs, and chickens? Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC.
2. Rocha-Rios J, Muñoz R, Revah S. 2010. Effect of silicone oil fraction and stirring rate on methane degradation in a stirred tank reactor. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:314–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2339.
3. Zúñiga C, Morales M, Le Borgne S, Revah S. 2011. Production of poly-ß-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) by Methylobacterium organophilum isolated from a methanotrophic consortium in a two-phase partition bioreactor. J Hazard Mater 190:876– 882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.011.
4. Strong PJ, Xie S, Clarke WP. 2015. Methane as a resource: can the methanotrophs add value? Environ Sci Technol 49:4001– 4018. https:// doi.org/10.1021/es504242n.
5. Wendlandt K-D, Stottmeister U, Helm J, Soltmann B, Jechorek M, Beck M. 2010. The potential of methane-oxidizing bacteria for applications in environmental biotechnology. Eng Life Sci. 10:87–102. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/elsc.200900093.
6. Zuñiga C, Morales M, Revah S. 2013. Polyhydroxyalkanoates accumulation by Methylobacterium organophilum CZ-2 during methane degradation using citrate or propionate as cosubstrates. Bioresour Technol 129:686– 689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.120.
7. Rocha-Rios J, Bordel S, Hernández S, Revah S. 2009. Methane degradation in two-phase partition bioreactors. Chem Eng J. 152:289–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.028.
8. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455– 477. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021.
9. Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. 2012. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28:1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.1093/ bioinformatics/bts174.
10. Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. 2011. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27:578 –579. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683.
11. Wences AH, Schatz MC. 2015. Metassembler: merging and optimizing de novo genome assemblies. Genome Biol 16:207. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13059-015-0764-4.
12. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. https://doi .org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.
13. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334.
14. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J. 2017. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67: 1613–1617. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001755.