Oh behave! Survey stories and lessons learned from building occupants in high-performance buildings

Energy Research and Social Science

Volumn 31, Issue , 2017, Pages 11-20

  Day, Julia K ^a   O'Brien, William ^b  

^a Washington State University   (United States)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Energy use; High performance buildings; Occupant behavior; Survey stories

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027587228     PISSN: 22146296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.037     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cole, R.J., Brown, Z., Reconciling human and automated intelligence in the provision of occupant comfort. Intelli. Build. Int. 1:1 (2011), 39–55, 10.3763/inbi.2009.0007.
2. Shen, H., Tzempelikos, A., Daylighting and energy analysis of private offices with automated interior roller shades. Sol. Energy 86:2 (2012), 681–704, 10.1016/j.solener.2011.11.016.
3. Ackerly, K.C., Brager, G., Occupant Response to Window Control Signaling Systems. 2011, Center for the Built Environment, University of California, Berkeley.
4. Karjalainen, S., Thermal comfort and use of thermostats in Finnish homes and offices. Build. Environ. 44:6 (2009), 1237–1245.
5. Day, J., Heschong, L., Understanding behavior potential: the role of building interfaces. ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Pacific Grove, CA, 2016, 8.
6. O'Brien, W., Gunay, H.B., The contextual factors contributing to occupants’ adaptive comfort behaviors in offices? A review and proposed modeling framework. Build. Environ. 77 (2014), 77–87.
7. Theodorson, J., Day, J., Effectiveness of dynamic daylighting. post occupancy evaluation of a higher ed building. PLEA 2011 Proceedings, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 2011.
8. Brown, G.Z., Cole, J., Rethinking the Design Process. 2006 Retrieved October 4 2010 from http://www.betterbricks.com/graphics/assets/documents/IED.
9. Day, J., Theodorson, J., Van Den Wymelenberg, K., Understanding controls, behaviors and satisfaction in the daylit perimeter office: a daylight design case study. J. Inter. Des. 37:1 (2012), 17–34.
10. Zeisel, J., Hyde, J., Levkoff, S., Best practices: an environment-behavior (E-B) model for Alzheimer special care units. Am. J. Alzheimer's Care Relat. Disord. Res. 9 (1994), 4–21.
11. Berker, T., Domesticating spaces sociotechnical studies and the built environment. Space Cult. 14:3 (2011), 259–268.
12. Day, J., Gunderson, D.E., Understanding high-performance buildings: the link between occupant knowledge of passive design systems, corresponding behaviors, occupant comfort and environmental satisfaction. Build. Environ. 84 (2014), 114–124, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.003.
13. Preiser, W.F.E., Feedback, feedforward and control: post-occupancy evaluation to the rescue. Build. Res. Inform. 29:6 (2001), 456–459, 10.1080/09613210110072692.
14. Moezzi, M., Hammer, C., Goins, J., Meier, A., Behavioral strategies to reduce the gap between potential and actual savings in commercial buildings. 2014, Air Resources Board, ASacramento Contract Number : 09-327.
15. Janda, K.B., Topouzi, M., Telling tales: using stories to remake energy policy. Build. Res. Inform. 43:4 (2015), 516–533.
16. Rotmann, S.B., Goodchild, Mourik, R., Once upon a time. How to tell a good energy efficiency story that ‘sticks’. Proceedings of the ECEEE Summer Study, European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy: Stockholm, Sweden, 1–6 June 2015, 2015.
17. Moezzi, M., Goins, J., Text mining for occupant perspectives on the physical workplace?. Build. Res. Inform. 39:2 (2011), 169–182.
18. Doiron, M., O'Brien, W., Athienitis, A.K., Energy performance, comfort and lessons learned from a near net-zero energy solar house. ASHRAE Trans. 117:2 (2011), 1–13.
19. Bennet, I., Field study of thermal comfort and occupant satisfaction in Canadian condominiums. Archit. Sci. Rev. 60:1 (2016), 27–39, 10.1080/00038628.2016.1205179.
20. Day, J., Theodorson, J., Layers of light: a field study of dynamic daylighting systems and daylight variability in classrooms: Spokane falls community college, sn-w'ey’-mn building. Proceedings from ASES Conference, Phoenix, AZ, 2010.
21. Haldi, F., Robinson, D., Adaptive actions on shading devices in response to local visual stimuli. J. Build. Perform. Simul. 3:2 (2010), 135–153, 10.1080/19401490903580759.
22. Ackerly, K., Baker, L., Brager, G., Window use in mixed-mode buildings: A literature review. (Summary Report)., 2011, Center for the Built Environment.
23. Morgan, C., de Dear, R., Weather, clothing and thermal adaptation to indoor climate. Clim. Res. 24:3 (2003), 267–284.
24. Heerwagen, J., Diamond, C., Adaptations and coping: occupant response to discomfort in energy efficient buildings. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of ACEEE Summer School on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Washington DC, 1992.
25. Borgeson, S., Brager, G., Occupant Control of Windows: Accounting for Human Behavior in Building Simulation. 2008, University of California, Berkeley Center for the Built Environment (CBE).
26. Schweiker, M., Wagner, A., The effect of occupancy on perceived control, neutral temperature, and behavioral patterns. Energy Build. 117 (2016), 246–259.
27. Gunay, H.B., O'Brien, W., Beausoleil-Morrison, I., Perna, A., On behavioral effects of residential electricity submetering. Build. Environ. 81 (2014), 396–403.
28. Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Changing habits, lifestyles and choices: the behaviours that drive feedback-induced energy savings. ECEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, 2011 Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/group/peec/cgi- bin/docs/behavior/research/Ehrhardt- Martinez%20ECEEE%20Feedback%20Behaviors%208-454%20FINAL%20(2).pdf.
29. Paciuk, M., The Role of Personal Control of the Environment in Thermal Comfort and Satisfaction at the Workplace (PhD Thesis). 1989, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
30. Galasiu, A.D., Veitch, J.A., Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review. Energy Build. 38:7 (2006), 728–742.