Understanding controls, behaviors and satisfaction in the daylit perimeter office: A daylight design case study

Journal of Interior Design

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 17-34

  Day, Julia ^a   Theodorson, Judy ^a   Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864138989     PISSN: 10717641     EISSN: 19391668     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1668.2011.01068.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ander, G. D. (2008, November 05). Whole building design guide. Daylighting. Retrieved from http://www.wbdg.org/resources/daylighting.php
2. Baker, N. & Steemers, K. (2002). Chapter 3: Building form and the potential for daylighting, daylight design of buildings. (p. 27-40). London, UK: James & James Ltd.
3. Begemann, S. H. A., van den Beld, G. J., & Tenner, A. D. (1997). Daylight, artificial light and people in an office environment, overview of visual and biological responses. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 231-239.
4. Bodart, M., & De Herde, A. (2002). Global energy savings in offices buildings by the use of daylighting. Energy and Buildings, 34, 421-429.
5. Boyce, P., Hunter, C., & Howlett, O. (2003). The Benefits of Daylight through Windows. (No. DE-FC26-02NT41497) California Energy Commission, 1-88.
6. Brown, G., & Cole, J. (2006). Rethinking the design process (No. 14037/06-1). Portland, OR: Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon and Konstrukt.
7. Chain, C., Dumortier, D., & Fontoynont, M. (2001). Consideration of daylight's colour. Energy and Buildings, 33, 193-198.
8. Cole, R., Robinson, J., Brown, Z., & O'Shea, M. (2008). Re-contextualizing the notion of comfort. Building Research & Information, 36(4), 323-336.
9. Day, J., & Theodorson, J. (2010). Layers of Light: A Field Study of Dynamic Daylighting Systems and Daylight Variability in Classrooms: Spokane Falls Community College, sn-w'ey'-mn Building. Proceedings from ASES Conference. Phoenix, AZ.
10. Edwards, L., & Torcellini, P. (2002). A Literature Review of the Effects of Natural Light on Building Occupants. No. NREL/TP-550-30769) National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1-54.
11. Escuyer, S., & Fontoynont, M. (2001). Lighting controls: A field study of office workers' reactions. Lighting Research & Technology, 33(2), 77-96.
12. Estes, J. J, Schreppler, S., & Newsom, T. (2004). Daylighting prediction software: Comparative analysis and application. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates, Richardson, TX, May 17-20, 259-267.
13. Foster, M., & Oreszcyn, T. (2001). Occupant control of passive systems: The use of venetian blinds. Building and Environment, 36, 149-155.
14. Franta, G., & Anstead, K. (1994). Daylighting offers great opportunities. Window & Door Specifier-Design Lab, Spring, 40-43.
15. Friedman, A., Zimring, C., & Zube, C. (1978). Environmental Design Evaluation. New York: Plenum.
16. Frumkin, H. (2003). Healthy places: Exploring the evidence. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1451-1456.
17. Galasiu, A. D., & Veitch, J. A. (2006). Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 728-742.
18. Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2008). Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications, 9th ed. London: Prentice Hall.
19. Heerwagen, J. H., Johnson, J. A., Brothers, P., Little, R., & Rosenfeld, A. (1998). Energy effectiveness and the ecology of work: Links to productivity and well-being. Proceedings of the 1998 ACEEE Summer Study. Washington, DC: The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
20. Heschong, L. (2002). Daylighting and human performance. ASHRAE Journal, June, 65-67.
21. Lee, Y., & Guerin, D. (2009). Indoor environmental quality related to occupant satisfaction and performance in LEED-certified buildings. Journal of Indoor and Built Environment, 18(4), 293-300.
22. Leslie, R. P. (2003). Capturing the daylight dividend in buildings: why and how? Building and Environment, 38(2), 381-385.
23. Moore, T., Carter, D., & Slater, A. (2003). Long-term patterns of use of occupant controlled office lighting. Lighting Research & Technology, 35(1), 43-59.
24. Nabil, A., & Mardaljevic, J. (2005). Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Lighting Research Technology, 37(1), 41.
25. National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS). (2010). Executive Order 13423 Technical Guidance-Daylighting. Washington, DC. Retrieved November 21, 2009, from http://www.wbdg.org/references/mou_daylight.php
26. Newsham, G., Veitch, J., Arsenault, C., & Duval, C. (2004). Effect of dimming control on office worker satisfaction and performance. Canada: Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council.
27. Nicol, F., Wilson, M., & Chiancarella, C. (2006). Using field measurements of desktop illuminance in European offices to investigate its dependence on outdoor conditions and its effect on occupant satisfaction, and the use of lights and blinds. Energy & Buildings, 38(7), 802-813.
28. NOAA National Climatic Data Center. (2010). Hourly Climate Data. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/mpp/freedata.htmlFREE
29. Osterhaus, W. K. E. (2005). Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments. Solar Energy, 79, 140-158.
30. Rashid, M., & Zimring, C. (2008). A review of the empirical literature on the relationships between indoor environment and stress in health care and office settings: Problems and prospects of sharing evidence. Environment and Behavior, 40(2), 151-173.
31. Rea, M. S. (1984). Window blind occlusion: A pilot study. Building and Environment, 19(2), 133-137.
32. Rea, M. S. (2000). The IESNA Lighting Handbook, 9th Edition. New York, NY: The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, ISBN 0-87995-150-8.
33. Reinhart, C. F., Mardaljevic, J., & Rogers, Z. (2006). Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. Leukos, 3(1), 1-25.
34. Robbins, C. L. (1986). Daylighting design and analysis (pp. 4-13). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
35. Rubin, A. I., Collins, B. L., & Tibbott, R. L. (1978). Window blinds as a potential energy saver-A case study. NSB Building Science Series 112, National Bureau of Standards, Washington.
36. Ruck, N., Aschehoug, O., Aydinli, A., Christoffersen, J., Courret, G., Edmonds, I., Jakobiak, R., Kischkoweit-Lopin, M., Klinger, M., Lee, E., Michel, L., Scartezzini, J. L., & Selkowitz, S. (2000). Daylight in Buildings. A source book on daylighting systems and components. (Report No. IEA SHC Task 21/ ECBCS Annex 29). Retrieved from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory website http://gaia.lbl.gov/iea21/.
37. Stokols, D., & Scharf, F. (1990). Developing standardised tools for assessing employees' ratings of facility performance. In G. Davis & F. T. Ventre (Eds.), Performance of buildings and serviceability of facilities (pp. 55-68). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
38. Theodorson, J. (2009). Daylit classrooms at 47n, 117w insights from occupation. In C. Demers & A. Potvin (Eds.), PLEA 2009: Architecture, energy and the occupant's perspective (286-290). Quebec City: Les Presses de l'Laval.
39. Theodorson, J., & Day, J. (2010). Occupant perceptions of daylit classrooms: A comparison of north and south orientation. Proceedings: IDEC Conference, Atlanta, GA.
40. Theodorson, J., & Day, J. (2011). Effectiveness of Dynamic Daylighting. Post Occupancy Evaluation of a Higher Ed Building. Proceedings: PLEA 2011, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
41. Townsend, A. K. (2006). Green business: A five-part model for creating an environmentally responsible company. Atglen, PA: Schiffer.
42. Ulrich, R., & Zimring, C. (2004). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century: A once in a lifetime opportunity. Center for Health Design.
43. Veitch, J., Farley K. M. J., & Newsham, G. (2002) Environmental Satisfaction in Open-Plan Environments: 1. Scale Validation and Methods. Technical Report No. IRC IR 844, April. National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
44. Veitch, J., Hine, D., & Gifford, R. (1993). End user's knowledge, beliefs, and preferences for lighting. Journal of Interior Design, 19(2), 15-26.
45. Veitch, J. A., & Gifford, R. (1996). Assessing beliefs about lighting effects on health, performance, mood and social behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 446-470.
46. Zeisel, J., Hyde, J., & Levkoff, S. (1994). Best practices: An environment-behavior (E-B) model for Alzheimer special care units. American Journal of Alzheimer's Care and Related Disorders and Research, 9, 4-21.