Considering non-open access publication charges in the “total cost of publication”

Publications

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 248-262

  Gray, Andrew ^a  

^a BRITISH ANTARCTIC SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colour charges; Page charges; Publishing charges; Scholarly publishing; Submission charges

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027556108     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23046775     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/publications3040248     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Pinfield, S.; Salter, J.; Bath, P.A. The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open-access environment: institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2015, doi:10.1002/asi.23446.
2. Research Information Network. Activities, Costs and Funding Flows in the Scholarly Communications System in the UK, 2008. Available online: http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Activit es-costs-flows-report.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015).
3. White, S. SCONUL Detailed Library Statistics 2010–2011; SCONUL: London, UK, 2012. Available online: http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/ALS1011.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015).
4. Suber, P. Open Access; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012. Available online: https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/open-access (accessed on 3 October 2015).
5. RCUK. Policy on Open Access and Supporting Guidance, 8 April 2013. Available online: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015).
6. Lawson, S. “Total cost of ownership” of scholarly communication: Managing subscription and APC payments together. Learn. Publ. 2015, 28, 9–13.
7. Research Councils UK. Review oF the Implementation of the RCUK Policy on Open Access; Research Councils UK: Swindon, UK, 2015. Available online: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/Openaccessreport.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015)
8. Willetts, D. Progress Review: Implementing Finch Report recommendations; Letter to Prof Dame Janet Finch; Department for Business, Information and Skills: London, UK, 2014. Available online: http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/BIS-Transparency-Letter-to-Janet-Finch-One-Year-On-Response-January-2014.pdf (accessed on 3 October 2015).
9. Johnson, R.; Pinfield, S.; Fosci, M. Business process costs of implementing “gold” and “green” open access in institutional and national contexts. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2015, doi:10.1002/asi.23545.
10. Crow, R.; Goldstein, H. Guide to Business Planning for Converting a Subscription-based Journal to Open Access, 3rd ed.; Open Society Institute: New York, NY, USA, 2004. Available online: http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/pdf/business_converting.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015).
11. King, D.W.; McDonald, D.D.; Roderer, N.K. Scientific journals in the United States; Hutchinson Ross: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 1981.
12. King, D.W.; Alvarado-Albertorio, F.M. Pricing and other means of charging for scholarly journals: A literature review and commentary. Learn. Publ. 2008 21, 248–272.
13. Scheiding, T. Paying for knowledge one page at a time: The author fee in physics in twentieth-century America. Hist. Stud. Nat. Sci. 2009 39, 219–247.
14. Kiley, R. Colour and Page Charges: Results of a Brief Survey; Wellcome Trust: London, UK, 2013. Available online: http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Wellcome-survey-o f-colour-and-page-charges-v-02.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015).
15. Morris, S.; Barnas, E.; LaFrenier, D. The Handbook of Journal Publishing; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013.
16. Curb, L.A.; Abramson, C.I. An examination of author-paid charges in science journals. Compr. Psychol. 2012, 1, doi:10.2466/01.17.CP.1.4.
17. Page, G.; Campbell, R.; Meadows, J. Journal Publishing; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997.
18. Kaufman-Wills Group, LLC. The Facts About Open Access: A Study of the Financial and Non-Financial Effects of Alternative Business Models for Scholarly Journals; Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers: London, UK, 2005. Available online: http://www.alpsp.org/publications/FAOAcompleteRE V.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015).
19. Ware, M. Submission Fees—a Tool in the Transition to Open Access? Summary of a Report to Knowledge Exchange; Mark Ware Consulting: Bristol, UK, 2010. Available online: http://www.knowledge-exchange.info/Default.aspx?ID=413 (accessed on 3 October 2015).
20. Walters, W.H. Institutional journal costs in an open access environment. J. Assn. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2006 58, 108–120.
21. Ware, M.; Mabe, M. The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing, 3rd ed.; International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers: Hague, The Netherlands, 2012. Available online: http://www.stm-assoc.or g/2012_12_11_STM_Report_2012.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015).
22. Waltham, M. JISC: Learned Society Open Access Business Models. 2005. Available online: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/themes/infoenvironment/learnedsocietyoabusinessmodels.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015).
23. Waltham, M. The future of scholarly journal publishing among social science and humanities associations. J. Schol. Pub. 2010 41, 257–324.
24. Pira International. Publishing in the Knowledge Economy: Competitiveness Analysis of the UK Publishing Media Sector; Department of Trade and Industry: London, UK, 2002. Available online: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file13777.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015).
25. Hourican, R., Martin, N., and TFPL Limited. Journal Publishing Statistics Survey 1999: a report for the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers; TFPL: London, UK, 2001. Available online: http://www.alpsp.org/TFPLr eport.pdf (accessed on 3 October 2015).
26. Larivière, V., Haustein, S., and Mongeon, P. The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLOS ONE. 2015 10, e0127502.
27. Gray, A.D. British Antarctic Survey Submission to the RCUK Open Access Policy Review. British Antarctic Survey: Cambridge, UK, 2014. Available online: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/docum ents/oadocs/BritishAntarcticSurvey.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2015).
28. University of Birmingham: Funders and open access. Available online: https://intranet.birmi ngham.ac.uk/as/libraryservices/library/services/research/open-access/funding/Funders-and-open-ac cess.aspx (accessed on 23 July 2015).
29. University of Durham: RCUK Open Access Policy FAQs. Available online: https://www.dur.ac. uk/research.office/research-outputs/openaccess/oafaq/rcuk/(accessed on 23 July 2015).
30. St. George’s University of London: RCUK FAQs. Available online: http://library.sgul.ac.uk/researchers/open-access-faqs/rcuk-faqs (accessed on 23 July 2015).
31. APCs—Leeds University Library. Available online: http://library.leeds.ac.uk/open-access-funding (accessed on 23 July 2015).
32. Lawson, S. RCUK APC data (2013-14), Figshare 2014, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1180122.
33. Andrew, T, et al. University of Edinburgh RCUK Gold Open Access APC data (2013-14). Figshare 2014, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1146256.
34. Reimer, T.F. Imperial College London Submission to the RCUK Review on Open Access; Imperial College LonLondon, UK, 2014. Available online: https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk:8443/handle/10044/1/15558 (accessed on 23 July 2015).
35. Research Councils UK. RCUK Open Access Policy: Compliance and Financial Reporting for Year 2 of the Policy (1 August 2014 to 31 July 2015); Research Councils UK: Swindon, UK, 2015. Available online: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/OA/RCUKOA reportingGuidance.pdf (accessed on 3 October 2015).
36. HEFCE. Policy for Open Access in the Post-2014 Research Excellence Framework: Updated July 2015; Higher Education Funding Council for England: Bristol, UK, 2015. Available online: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2014/201407/(accessed on 3 October 2015).
37. Walk, P. RCUK RIOXX Application Profile Version 2.0 Final Version; EDINA: Edinburgh, UK, 2015. Available online: http://rioxx.net/v2-0-final/(accessed on 3 October 2015).