Institutional journal costs in an open access environment

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 108-120

  Walters, William H ^a  

^a MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVENTIONAL MODEL; COST SAVINGS; LIBRARY HOLDINGS; OPEN ACCESS MODEL;

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLISHING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 33845970215     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20441     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. American Physiological Society. (2006). Statistics. Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.the-aps.org/publications/ajpcell/ stats.htm
2. Antelman. K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372-382.
3. Ashling, J. (2003). Open access and the public domain. Information Today, 20(5), 27-29.
4. Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. (2006). ALPSP hot topics: Open access journals. Clapham, West Sussex: Author. Retrieved January 11. 2006, from http://www.alpsp.org/htp_openacc.htm
5. Bailey, C.W., Jr. (2005). Open access bibliography: Liberating scholarly literature with e-prints and open access journals. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www. escholarlypub.com/oab/oab.pdf
6. Bot, M., Burgemeester, J., & Roes, H. (1998). The cost of publishing an electronic journal: A general model and a case study. D-Lib Magazine, 4(10), Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november98/11roes.html
7. Chan, L., et al. (2002). Budapest open access initiative. New York: Open Society Institute. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.soros.org/ openaccess/read.shtml
8. Davis, P.M. (2004). Calculating the cost per article in the current subscription model. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Library. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://dspace.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/236
9. Davis, P.M., Ehling, T., Habicht, O., How, S., Saylor, J.M., & Walker, K. (2004). Report of the CUL Task Force on Open Access Publishing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Library. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://dspacc.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/193
10. EBSCO Information Services. (2006a). EBSCONET serials management system [Online database], Birmingham, AL: Author.
11. EBSCO Information Services. (2006b). The serials directory [Online data-base]. Birmingham, AL: Author.
12. Ewing, J.H. (2004), Open access to journals won't lower prices. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(6), B20.
13. Holmström, J. (2004). The cost per article reading of open access articles. D-Lib Magazine, 10(1). Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january04/holmstrom/01holmstrom.html
14. Horton, R. (2004). Electronic cultures and clinics: reasons to be hysterical (and hopeful). San Diego: Elsevier. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.elsevier.com/framework_librarians/LibraryConnect/lclecturehorton.pdf
15. Kaufman-Wills Group. (2005). The facts about open access: A study of the financial and non-financial effects of alternative business models for scholarly journals. Clapham, West Sussex: Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.alpsp.org/publications/ FAOAcompleteREV.pdf
16. King, D.W., & Tenopir, C. (1998). Economic cost models of scientific scholarly journals. In D. Shaw & D. Price (Eds.), Proceedings of ICSU Press workshop on economics, real costs and benefits of electronic publishing in science: A technical study. Paris: International Council for Science. Retrieved January 11, 2006. from http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/icsu/index.html
17. King, D.W., & Tenopir, C. (1999). Evolving journal costs: Implications for publishers, libraries, and readers. Learned Publishing, 12(4), 251-258.
18. Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411 (6837). 521.
19. Mabe, M.A. (2004). Peer review and pay-to-publish: The world turned upside down? Against the Grain, 16(3), 55-56.
20. Mabe, M.A., & Amin, M. (2002). Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Hyde: Author-reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing. Aslib Proceedings, 54(3), 149-157.
21. McCormick, A.C. (Ed.). (2001). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education (2000 ed.). Menlo Park. CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
22. McDonough, B. (2004). American library directory 2004-2005 (57th ed.). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
23. Mellman, I. (2004). How journals can "realistically" boost access. London: Nature Publishing Group. Retrieved January II. 2006, from http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/acuessdebate/11.html
24. Morris, S. (2005). The true costs of scholarly journal publishing. Learned Publishing, 18(2), 115-126.
25. National Institutes of Health. (2005). PubMed Central (Online database]. Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.pubmedcentral. nih.gov
26. Nature Publishing Group. (2004). Access to the literature; The debate continues. London: Nature Publishing Group. Retrieved January 11, 2006. from http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/index.hlml
27. Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2005). Open access publishing: The evidence from the authors. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(3), 179-181.
28. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., & Rowlands, I. (2005). Open access journal publishing: The views of some of the world's senior authors. Journal of Documentation, 61(4), 497-519.
29. Odlyzko, A. (1997). The economics of electronic journals. First Monday, 2(8). Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/ issue2_8/odlyzko
30. Pinfield, S., & Ayris, P. (2005). Still hogging research profits'? Times Higher Education Supplement, 1706, 15.
31. Public Library of Science. (2002). Public Library of Science to launch new free-access biomedical journals with $9 million grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. San Francisco: Author. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.plos.org/news/announce_moore.html
32. Romero, M. (2003). Open access and the case for public good: The scientists' perspective. Online, 27(4), 32-33.
33. Schmidt, K.D., Sennyey, P., & Carstens, T.V. (2005). New roles for a changing environment: Implications of open access for libraries. College & Research Libraries, 66(5), 407-416.
34. Schonfeld, R.C., King, D.W., Okerson, A., & Fenton, E.G. (2004). The non-subscription side of periodicals: Changes in library operations and costs between print and electronic formats. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.clir.org/ pubs/reports/pub127/pub127.pdf
35. Schwartz, C.A. (2005). Reassessing prospects for the open access movement. College & Research Libraries, 66(6), 488-495.
36. Suber, P. (Ed.). (2005). SPARC open access newsletter. Washington, DC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.arl.org/sparc/soa
37. Suber, P., Brown, P.O., Cabell, D., Chakravarti, A., Cohen, B., Delamothe, T., et al. (2003). Bethesda statement on open access publishing. Chevy Chase, MD: Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Retrieved January II. 2006, from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
38. Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2005). Open access self-archiving: An author study. Truro, Cornwall: Key Perspectives. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.keyperspectives.co.uk/openaccessarchive/reports/ Open%20Access%20II%20(author%20survey%20on%20self%20archiving)%202005.pdf
39. Tenopir, C., & King, D.W. (1997). Trends in scientific scholarly journal publishing in the United States. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 28(3), 135-170.
40. Testa, J. (2004). The Thomson Scientific journal selection process. Philadelphia: Thomson Scientific. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/jourrnalselection U.S. News & World Report. (2004). America's nest colleges 2004. New York: Author.
41. Walters, W.H. (2004). Criteria for replacing print journals with online journal resources: The importance of sustainable access. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48(4), 300-304.
42. Wellcome Trust. (2003). Economic analysis of scientific research publishing. London: Author. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/assets/wtd003182.pdf
43. Wellcome Trust. (2004). Costs and business models in scientific research publishing. London: Author. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/assets/wtd003184.pdf
44. Worlock, D.R. (2004). Open access: Free for all-or more expensive for everyone? Charleston Advisor, 6(2), 50-55.