The reporting quality of abstracts of stepped wedge randomized trials is suboptimal: A systematic survey of the literature

Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

Volumn 8, Issue , 2017, Pages 1-10

  Wang, Mei ^a,h   Jin, Yanling ^a   Hu, Zheng Jing ^b   Thabane, Alex ^a,c   Dennis, Brittany ^a,d   Gajic Veljanoski, Olga ^a,e   Paul, James ^a   Thabane, Lehana ^a,f,g,h  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e St Peter's Hospital   (Canada)

^f CENTRE FOR EVALUATION OF MEDICINES   (Canada)

^g HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

^h MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Abstract; CONSORT; Reporting quality; Stepped wedge design randomized trial

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027490945     PISSN: 24518654     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.08.009     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Barry, H.C., Ebell, M.H., Shaughnessy, A.F., Slawson, D.C., Nietzke, F., Family physicians’ use of medical abstracts to guide decision making: style or substance?. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract. 14 (2001), 437–442.
2. Pitkin, R.M., Branagan, M.A., Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions?. JAMA 280:3 (1998 Jul 15), 267–269.
3. Brown, C.A., Lilford, R.J., The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 6, 2006 Nov 8, 54.
4. The Gambia Hepatitis Study Group, The Gambia hepatitis intervention study. Cancer Res. 47:21 (1987 Nov 1), 5782–5787.
5. Prost, A., Binik, A., Abubakar, I., et al. Logistic, ethical, and political dimensions of stepped wedge trials: critical review and case studies. Trials, 16, 2015 Aug 17, 351, 10.1186/s13063-015-0837-4.
6. Mdege, N.D., Man, M.S., Taylor Nee Brown, C.A., Torgerson, D.J., Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64:9 (2011 Sep), 936–948, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.003.
7. Hemming, K., Haines, T.P., Chilton, P.J., Girling, A.J., Lilford, R.J., The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ, 350, 2015 Feb 6, h391, 10.1136/bmj.h391.
8. Davey, C., Hargreaves, J., Thompson, J.A., et al. Analysis and reporting of stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: synthesis and critical appraisal of published studies, 2010 to 2014. Trials, 16, 2015 Aug 17, 358, 10.1186/s13063-015-0838-3.
9. Beard, E., Lewis, J.J., Copas, A., et al. Stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2014. Trials, 16, 2015 Aug 17, 353, 10.1186/s13063-015-0839-2.
10. Martin, J., Taljaard, M., Girling, A., Hemming, K., Systematic review finds major deficiencies in sample size methodology and reporting for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials. BMJ Open, 6(2), 2016 Feb 4, e010166, 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010166.
11. Begg, C., Cho, M., Eastwood, S., et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT Statement. JAMA 276:8 (1996 Aug 28), 637–639.
12. Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Moher, D., et al. CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet 371:9609 (2008 Jan 26), 281–283, 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61835-2.
13. Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Moher, D., et al. CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med., 5(1), 2008 Jan 22, e20, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050020.
14. Littlewood, C., Ashton, J., Chance-Larsen, K., May, S., Sturrock, B., The quality of reporting might not reflect the quality of the study: implications for undertaking and appraising a systematic review. J. Man. Manip. Ther. 20:3 (2012 Aug), 130–134, 10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000013.
15. Soares, H.P., Daniels, S., Kumar, A., et al. Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. BMJ 328 (2004), 22–24.
16. Thabane, A., Dennis, B.B., Gajic-Veljanoski, O., Paul, J., Thabane, L., Reporting quality of stepped wedge design randomized trials: a systematic review protocol. Clin. Epidemiol. 8 (2016 Jul 8), 261–266, 10.2147/CLEP.S103098 eCollection 2016.
17. Fleming, P.S., Buckley, N., Seehra, J., Polychronopoulou, A., Pandis, N., Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 142:4 (2012 Oct), 451–458, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.013.
18. McGovern, M.E., A Practical Introduction to Stata. 2012 August, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies Geary Institute and School of Economics, University College Dublin, 25.
19. Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M., West, R., The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci., 6, 2011 Apr 23, 42, 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
20. Burns, K.E., Adhikari, N.K., Kho, M., et al. Abstract reporting in randomized clinical trials of acute lung injury: an audit and assessment of a quality of reporting score. Crit. Care Med. 33:9 (2005 Sep), 1937–1945.
21. Guo, J.W., Iribarren, S.J., Reporting quality for abstracts of randomized controlled trials in cancer nursing research. Cancer Nurs. 37:6 (2014 Nov-Dec), 436–444, 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000112.
22. Kiriakou, J., Pandis, N., Madianos, P., Polychronopoulou, A., Assessing the reporting quality in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in leading journals of oral implantology. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 14:1 (2014 Mar), 9–15, 10.1016/j.jebdp.2013.10.018 Epub 2013 Dec 19.
23. Seehra, J., Wright, N.S., Polychronopoulou, A., Cobourne, M.T., Pandis, N., Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in dental specialty journals. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 13:1 (2013 Mar), 1–8, 10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.11.001.
24. Hopewell, S., Ravaud, P., Baron, G., Boutron, I., Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. BMJ, 344, 2012 Jun 22, e4178, 10.1136/bmj.e4178.
25. Can, O.S., Yilmaz, A.A., Hasdogan, M., et al. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 28:7 (2011 Jul), 485–492, 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833fb96f.
26. Pandis, N., Polychronopoulou, A., Eliades, T., An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals. J. Dent. 38:9 (2010 Sep), 713–721, 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.014 Epub 2010 Jun 9.
27. Gerstein, M., Seringhaus, M., Fields, S., Structured digital abstract makes text mining easy. Nature, 447(7141), 2007 May 10, 142.
28. Hartley, J., Current findings from research on structured abstracts: an update. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 102:3 (2014 Jul), 146–148, 10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.002.
29. Sharma, S., Harrison, J.E., Structured abstracts: do they improve the quality of information in abstracts?. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 130:4 (2006 Oct), 523–530.
30. Berwanger, O., Ribeiro, R.A., Finkelsztejn, A., et al. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62:4 (2009 Apr), 387–392, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013 Epub 2008 Nov 17.
31. Wang, L., Li, Y., Li, J., et al. Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for Abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine. Trials, 11, 2010 Jul 8, 75, 10.1186/1745-6215-11-75.
32. Scherer, R.W., Crawley, B., Reporting of randomized clinical trial descriptors and use of structured abstracts. JAMA 280:3 (1998 Jul 15), 269–272.
33. Husaini, B.A., Reece, M.C., Emerson, J.S., Scales, S., Hull, P.C., Levine, R.S., A church-based program on prostate cancer screening for African American men: reducing health disparities. Ethn. Dis. 18 (2008), 179–184.
34. Weiner, M., El Hoyek, G., Wang, L., et al. A web-based generalist-specialist system to improve scheduling of outpatient specialty consultations in an academic center. J. Gen. Intern Med., 24, 2009, 710e5.
35. Moulton, L.H., Golub, J.E., Durovni, B., et al. Statistical design of THRio: a phased implementation clinic-randomized study of a tuberculosis preventive therapy intervention. Clin. Trials 4 (2007), 190–199.
36. Priestly, G., Watson, W., Rashidian, A., et al. Introducing critical care outreach: a ward-randomised trial of phased introduction in a general hospital. Intensive Care Med. 30 (2004), 1398–1404.
37. Hemming, K., Girling, A., Haines, T., Lilford, R., Protocol: consort extension to stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. EQUATOR Netw., July 12, 2014 http://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/Consort-SW-Protocol-V1.pdf, Accessed date 21 July 2017.