Assessing the reporting quality in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in leading journals of oral Implantology

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 9-15

  Kiriakou, Juliana ^a   Pandis, Nikolaos ^b   Madianos, Phoebus ^a   Polychronopoulou, Argy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Abstracts; Clinical trials; Implantology; Reporting

Indexed keywords

CHECKLIST; DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REGISTER; RESEARCH SUBJECT; STANDARDS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; CHECKLIST; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REGISTRIES; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 84895115057     PISSN: 15323382     EISSN: 15323390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2013.10.018     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. A.K. Akobeng Evidence-based child health. 1. Principles of evidence-based medicine Arch Dis Child 90 2005 837 840
2. J.M. Last A Dictionary of Epidemiology 2001 Oxford University Press New York
3. D.P.B. McGovern Randomized controlled trials D.P.B. McGovern, R.M. Valori, W.S.M. Summerskill, Key Topics in Evidence Based Medicine 2001 BIOS Scientific Publishers Oxford 26 29
4. D. Evans Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions J Clin Nurs 12 2003 77 84
5. K.F. Schulz, I. Chalmers, R.J. Hayes, and D.G. Altman Empirical evidence of bias. 2 Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials J Am Med Assoc 273 1995 408 412
6. D. Moher CONSORT: an evolving tool to help improve the quality of 3 reports of randomized controlled trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials J Am Med Assoc 279 1998 1489 1491
7. L.L. Kjaergard, J. Villumsen, and C. Gluud Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials Affects Estimates of Intervention Efficacy. 7th Cochrane Colloquium, Rome, Italy 1999
8. P. Jüni, D.G. Altman, and M. Egger Systematic reviews in health care: assessing 5 the quality of controlled clinical trials BMJ 323 2001 42 46
9. D. Moher, B. Pham, and A. Jones et al. Does the quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352 1998 609 613
10. C. Begg, M. Cho, and S. Eastwood et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement J Am Med Assoc 276 1996 637 639
11. D.G. Altman Better reporting of controlled trials: the CONSORT statement Br Med J 313 1996 570 571
12. D. Moher, S. Hopewell, and K.F. Schulz et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials BMJ 340 2010 c869
13. S. Hopewell, M. Clarke, and D. Moher et al. CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration PLoS Med 5 2008 e20
14. R.W. Scherer, P. Langenberg, and E. von Elm Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 2007 MR000005 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub3
15. C.L. Hill, R. Buchbinder, and R. Osborne Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in abstracts of the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology J Rheumatol 34 2007 2476 2480
16. P.S. Fleming, N. Buckley, J. Seehra, A. Polychronopoulou, and N. Pandis Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011 Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142 4 2012 451 458
17. C.M. Faggion Jr. , and N.N. Giannakopoulos Quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading journals of periodontology and dental implantology: a survey J Periodontol 83 10 2012 1251 1256
18. O. Berwanger, R.A. Ribeiro, and A. Finkelsztejn et al. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals J Clin Epidemiol 62 4 2009 387 392
19. J. Péron, G.R. Pond, and H.K. Gan et al. Quality of reporting of modern randomized controlled trials in medical oncology: a systematic review J Natl Cancer Inst 104 13 2012 982 989
20. Y. Chen, J. Li, and C. Ai et al. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals PLoS One 5 8 2010 e11926 10.1371/journal.pone.0011 926
21. O.S. Can, A.A. Yilmaz, and M. Hasdogan et al. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals Eur J Anaesthesiol 28 2011 485 492
22. K.E. Burns, N.K. Adhikari, and M. Kho et al. Abstract reporting in randomized clinical trials of acute lung injury: an audit and assessment of a quality of reporting score Crit Care Med 33 2005 1937 1945
23. S. Sharma, and J.E. Harrison Structured abstracts: do they improve the quality of information in abstracts? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 2006 523 530
24. S. Saha, S. Saint, and D.A. Christakis Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? J Med Libr Assoc 91 1 2003 42 46
25. P. Sjögren, and A. Halling Quality of reporting randomised clinical trials in dental and medical research Br Dent J 192 2 2002 100 103