Bioadhesive Nanoaggregates Based on Polyaspartamide-g-C18/DOPA for Wound Healing

Biomacromolecules

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 2402-2409

  Lim, Sooyoun ^a   Nguyen, Minh Phuong ^a   Choi, Youngjin ^a   Kim, Jaeyun ^a   Kim, Dukjoon ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC LIGHT SCATTERING; LIGHT SCATTERING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MAMMALS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

1H NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPIES; 3 ,4-DIHYDROXYPHENYLALANINE; ADHESIVE PROPERTIES; ADHESIVE STRENGTH; BREAKING STRENGTH; POLY(DIMETHYLACRYLAMIDE); POLYASPARTAMIDES; STRUCTURE AND MORPHOLOGY;

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;

DOPA; OCTADECYLAMINE; POLYMER; POLYPEPTIDE; POLYSUCCINIMIDE; TISSUE ADHESIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ADHESIVE AGENT; NYLON;

ADHESION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMIS; DRUG CYTOTOXICITY; GEL; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOUSE; MTT ASSAY; NANOFABRICATION; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PHOTON CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; RAT; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND HEALING; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; HUMAN; INJURIES; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; SKIN;

ADHESIVES; ANIMALS; CELL LINE; DIHYDROXYPHENYLALANINE; HUMANS; MICE; NYLONS; SKIN; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 85027316917     PISSN: 15257797     EISSN: 15264602     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00584     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kjaergard, H. K. Suture support: Is it advantageous? Am. J. Surg. 2001, 182 (2) 15S-20S 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00772-3
2. Armitage, J.; Lockwood, S. Skin incisions and wound closure Surgery (Oxford) 2011, 29 (10) 496-501 10.1016/j.mpsur.2011.06.022
3. Spotnitz, W. D.; Burks, S. Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives III: a new update as well as cost and regulatory considerations for components of the surgical toolbox Transfusion 2012, 52 (10) 2243-2255 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03707.x
4. Majno, G. The healing hand: man and wound in the ancient world, new ed.; Majno, G.; Harvard University Press, 1991.
5. Quinn, J. V. Tissue adhesives in clinical medicine, 2 nd ed.; Quinn, J. V.; PMPH-USA, 2005.
6. Reed, R. L. I.; Merrell, R. C.; Meyers, W. C.; Fischer, R. P. Continuing evolution in the approach to severe liver trauma Ann. Surg. 1992, 216 (5) 524-538 10.1097/00000658-199211000-00002
7. Uranüs, S.; Mischinger, H.-J.; Pfeifer, J.; Kronberger, L., Jr.; Rabl, H.; Werkgartner, G.; Steindorfer, P.; Kraft-Kirz, J. Hemostatic methods for the management of spleen and liver injuries World J. Surg. 1996, 20 (8) 1107-1112 10.1007/s002689900169
8. Murray, K. D.; Ho, C.-H.; Hsia, J.-Y. J.; Little, A. G. The influence of pulmonary staple line reinforcement on air leaks Chest 2002, 122 (6) 2146-2149 10.1378/chest.122.6.2146
9. Khan, R. J. K.; Fick, D.; Yao, F.; Tang, K.; Hurworth, M.; Nivbrant, B.; Wood, D. A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. Vol. 2006, 88 (2) 238-242 10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.16923
10. Siemer, S.; Lahme, S.; Altziebler, S.; Machtens, S.; Strohmaier, W.; Wechsel, H.-W.; Goebell, P.; Schmeller, N.; Oberneder, R.; Stolzenburg, J.-U. Efficacy and safety of TachoSil® as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumour resection: a randomised prospective study Eur. Urol. 2007, 52 (4) 1156-1163 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.027
11. Mehdizadeh, M.; Yang, J. Design strategies and applications of tissue bioadhesives Macromol. Biosci. 2013, 13 (3) 271-288 10.1002/mabi.201200332
12. Meddahi-Pellé, A.; Legrand, A.; Marcellan, A.; Louedec, L.; Letourneur, D.; Leibler, L. Organ repair, hemostasis, and in vivo bonding of medical devices by aqueous solutions of nanoparticles Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (25) 6369-6373 10.1002/anie.201401043
13. Kendall, K. Molecular adhesion and its applications: the sticky universe; Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
14. Lauto, A.; Mawad, D.; Foster, L. J. R. Adhesive biomaterials for tissue reconstruction J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2008, 83 (4) 464-472 10.1002/jctb.1771
15. Simonova, G.; Rickard, C. M.; Dunster, K. R.; Smyth, D. J.; McMilan, D.; Fraser, J. F. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives-effective securement technique for intravascular catheters: in vitro testing of safety and feasibility Anaesth. Intensive Care 2012, 40 (3) 460-466
16. Edmonson, M. B. Foreign body reactions to dermabond Am. J. Emer. Med. 2001, 19 (3) 240-241 10.1053/ajem.2001.22672
17. Sahlin, J. J.; Peppas, N. A. Enhanced hydrogel adhesion by polymer interdiffusion: use of linear poly (ethylene glycol) as an adhesion promoter J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 1997, 8 (6) 421-436 10.1163/156856297X00362
18. Techawanitchai, P.; Ebara, M.; Idota, N.; Asoh, T.-A.; Kikuchi, A.; Aoyagi, T. Photo-switchable control of pH-responsive actuators via pH jump reaction Soft Matter 2012, 8 (10) 2844-2851 10.1039/c2sm07277g
19. Ehlerding, E. B.; Chen, F.; Cai, W. Biodegradable and renal clearable inorganic nanoparticles Adv. Sci. 2016, 3 (2) 1500223 10.1002/advs.201500223
20. Nel, A.; Xia, T.; Mädler, L.; Li, N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel Science 2006, 311 (5761) 622-627 10.1126/science.1114397
21. Mehdizadeh, M.; Weng, H.; Gyawali, D.; Tang, L.; Yang, J. Injectable citrate-based mussel-inspired tissue bioadhesives with high wet strength for sutureless wound closure Biomaterials 2012, 33 (32) 7972-7983 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.055
22. Zhang, H.; Bré, L. P.; Zhao, T. Y.; Zheng, Y.; Newland, B.; Wang, W. X. Mussel-inspired hyperbranched poly(amino ester) polymer as strong wet tissue adhesive Biomaterials 2014, 35 (2) 711-719 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.017
23. Utzig, T.; Stock, P.; Valtiner, M. Resolving non-specific and specific adhesive interactions of catechols at solid/liquid interfaces at the molecules scale Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (53) 9524-9528 10.1002/anie.201601881
24. Yu, J.; Wei, W.; Danner, E.; Ashley, R. K.; Israelachvili, J. N.; Waite, J. H. Mussel protein adhesion depends on interprotein thiol-mediated redox modulation Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7 (9) 588-590 10.1038/nchembio.630
25. Jeon, E. Y.; Hwang, B. H.; Yang, Y. J.; Kim, B. J.; Choi, B. H.; Jung, G. Y.; Cha, H. J. Rapidly light-activated surgical protein glue inspired by mussel adhesion and insect structural crosslinking Biomaterials 2015, 67, 11-19 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.014
26. Jo, S. H.; Sohn, J. S. Biomimetic adhesive materials containing cyanoacryl group for medical application Molecules 2014, 19 (10) 16779-16793 10.3390/molecules191016779
27. Zhang, H.; Zhao, T.; Newland, B.; Duffy, P.; Annaidh, A. N.; O'Cearbhaill, E. D.; Wang, W. On-demand and negative-thermo-swelling tissue adhesive based on highly branched ambivalent PEG-catechol copolymers J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3 (31) 6420-6428 10.1039/C5TB00949A
28. Jinsmaa, Y.; Florang, V. R.; Rees, J. N.; Mexas, L. M.; Eckert, L. L.; Allen, E. M. G.; Anderson, D. G.; Doorn, J. A. Dopamine-derived biological reactive intermediates and protein modifications: Implications for Parkinson's disease Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2011, 192 (1-2) 118-121 10.1016/j.cbi.2011.01.006
29. Wang, W.-C.; Wang, J.; Liao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Cao, B.; Song, G.; She, X. Surface initiated ATRP of acrylic acid on dopamine-functionalized AAO membranes J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117 (1) 534-541 10.1002/app.30939
30. Lee, M.; Jeong, J.; Kim, D. Intracellular uptake and pH-dependent release of doxorubicin from the self-assembled micelles based on amphiphilic polyaspartamide graft copolymers Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (1) 136-144 10.1021/bm501272c
31. Neri, P.; Antoni, G.; Benvenuti, F.; Cocola, F.; Gazzei, G. Synthesis of alpha beta-poly ((2-hydroxyethyl)-DL-aspartamide), a new plasma expander J. Med. Chem. 1973, 16 (8) 893-897 10.1021/jm00266a006
32. Seo, K.; Kim, J. D.; Kim, D. pH-dependent self-assembling behavior of imidazole-containing polyaspartamide derivatives J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2009, 90 (2) 478-486 10.1002/jbm.a.32086
33. Kim, S.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, D. pH sensitive swelling and releasing behavior of nano-gels based on polyaspartamide graft copolymers J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 356 (1) 100-106 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.003
34. An, J. H.; Huynh, N. T.; Jeon, Y. S.; Kim, J. H. Surface modification using bio-inspired adhesive polymers based on polyaspartamide derivatives Polym. Int. 2011, 60 (11) 1581-1586 10.1002/pi.3116
35. Rose, S.; Prevoteau, A.; Elzière, P.; Hourdet, D.; Marcellan, A.; Leibler, L. Nanoparticle solutions as adhesives for gels and biological tissues Nature 2013, 505 (7483) 382-385 10.1038/nature12806
36. Johner, A.; Joanny, J. F. Adsorption of polymeric brushes: Bridging J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96 (8) 6257-6273 10.1063/1.462617
37. Gerlier, D.; Thomasset, N. Use of MTT colorimetric assay to measure cell activation J. Immunol. Methods 1986, 94 (1-2) 57-63 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90215-2
38. Hussain, S. M.; Hess, K. L.; Gearhart, J. M.; Geiss, K. T.; Schlager, J. J. In vitro toxicity of nanoparticles in BRL 3A rat liver cells Toxicol. In Vitro 2005, 19 (7) 975-83 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.034
39. Gong, C.; Lu, C.; Li, B.; Shan, M.; Wu, G. Injectable dopamine-modified poly(α,β-aspartic acid) nanocomposite hydrogel as bioadhesive drug delivery system J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2017, 105 (4) 1000-1008 10.1002/jbm.a.35931